• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Stations which have given their name to a settlement they serve

Status
Not open for further replies.

CPG

Member
Joined
4 Oct 2015
Messages
6
Location
Peckham
Avonmouth didn’t exist as a settlement, or a placename, before the arrival of the railway in 1865,which led to the subsequent construction of the docks. Similarly, there was no settlement called Severn Beach before the railway. A terminus now, of course, but the site of Severn beach was open fields on a through freight line from Pilning to Avonmouth, until someone had the idea to install a platform and develop an estuary-side resort and call it Severn Beach. The current village was established as a result.
 
Last edited:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

M&NEJ

Member
Joined
7 Dec 2021
Messages
181
Location
Lancashire
I don't think Morecambe has been mentioned so far; but I think it may qualify. The original railway came to a pier on Morecambe Bay, adjacent to the small fishing village of Poulton-le-Sands. After the railway came, the village grew into a town and called itself Morecambe.
 

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
6,262
Location
West Wiltshire
Woking did't exist, the original station was named after nearby Woking Common, there wasn't a town called Woking.

New Milton was originally named after a village called Milton, about mile away on Lymington-Christchurch Road. A small shop & Post Office opened near the station and allegedly a rail official walked in and owner said it was new Milton post office, meaning a new post office at Milton. The LSWR then renamed station as New Milton which is name now used for town.
 

Fenchurch SP

Member
Joined
11 Jan 2021
Messages
118
Location
Merstham
Redhill station was named after the nearby Redhill Common and was in a rural area to the east of the town of Reigate. The settlement called Warwick Town near the station later adopted the name of Redhill.
 

Rescars

Member
Joined
25 May 2021
Messages
1,164
Location
Surrey
Redhill station was named after the nearby Redhill Common and was in a rural area to the east of the town of Reigate. The settlement called Warwick Town near the station later adopted the name of Redhill.
Further up the line, there was so little of Purley that the station opened as Godstone Road. It then became Caterham Junction before being renamed Purley in 1888.
 

norbitonflyer

Established Member
Joined
24 Mar 2020
Messages
2,409
Location
SW London
An instance of a borough - Brent - taking its name from one part of the area and leading to conceptual (and geographical) confusion. Like Camden, the borough named after Camden Town - lots of strange conversations round my way [elsewhere in that borough] between tourists and pedantic locals... (Yes, I'm a pedantic local.)
Similar confusion in SW Lonbdon, where places like Twickenham in the London Borough of Richmond upon Thames are erroneously referred to as being in Surrey. Being on the right bank of the Thames, Richmond itself was historically (pre 1965) in Surrey and has a Surrey postal address, (although counties are not required in postal addresses now, "Richmond" has to be distinguished from its older namesake in Yorkshire, and "Surrey" is shorter than "Upon Thames"). However, most of the borough is on the left bank and therefore in what used to be Middlesex - it was never in Surrey.
 

Ken H

On Moderation
Joined
11 Nov 2018
Messages
6,313
Location
N Yorks
What about Ribblehead? Was that a name pre railway? There are still arguments about where the Ribble rises. It aint at Ribblehead.
 

Mikey C

Established Member
Joined
11 Feb 2013
Messages
6,857
Similar confusion in SW Lonbdon, where places like Twickenham in the London Borough of Richmond upon Thames are erroneously referred to as being in Surrey. Being on the right bank of the Thames, Richmond itself was historically (pre 1965) in Surrey and has a Surrey postal address, (although counties are not required in postal addresses now, "Richmond" has to be distinguished from its older namesake in Yorkshire, and "Surrey" is shorter than "Upon Thames"). However, most of the borough is on the left bank and therefore in what used to be Middlesex - it was never in Surrey.
To confuse things more, Middlesex play the occasional cricket match at Richmond Cricket Ground, as Richmond Cricket club play in the Middlesex league, despite being on the wrong side of the river!
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
13,423
Location
Bristol
To confuse things more, Middlesex play the occasional cricket match at Richmond Cricket Ground, as Richmond Cricket club play in the Middlesex league, despite being on the wrong side of the river!
Plenty of examples of that in sports - Berwick-Upon-Tweed's football team play in the scottish leagues. My rugby club (MK) 1st XV used to play in the Beds/Bucks/Oxon league but the 2nd XV plays in the Northamptonshire/East Mids league, because we're right on the border.
 

Mcr Warrior

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Jan 2009
Messages
11,881
What about Ribblehead? Was that a name pre railway? There are still arguments about where the Ribble rises. It aint at Ribblehead.
Originally known as Batty Green, wasn't it?

Source of the River Ribble is generally acknowledged as being up on Gayle Moor, maybe a mile or three away from Ribblehead.
 

Dr_Paul

Established Member
Joined
3 Sep 2013
Messages
1,359
Surbiton? Originally known as Kingston upon Railway. The area didn't really exist as a built up area before the railway and was known as Seething Wells if anything (the Seething Wells names continues as the area around the Victorian water works - which are now sadly neglected).
There was a settlement called Surbiton, it's shown on an 1819 1" OS map reproduced in the London Village Atlas. It is around today's Surbiton Road, that is, a little way south of Kingston and a good half-mile north of what we now know as Surbiton, around the station. The map doesn't give a name for the area where the station was built.

Loughborough Junction has emerged as a distinct area since the station was built; I believe that Loughborough Park was an area around there, but that's just a street name these days.

The opposite has occurred with Walham Green. This was the area around Fulham Broadway station, and was the station's original name. Walham Green as a popular area name has completely disappeared, and this area is what most people today know as Fulham, although the original settlement of Fulham, including the High Street, is close to Putney Bridge station.
 

RyanOPlasty

Member
Joined
9 Feb 2020
Messages
62
Location
Nuneaton
Whitley Bay was indirectly named as a result of the railway. There had been confusion between Whitley and Whitby (Both on the NER, but 50 miles apart as the crow flies and many more by rail)
In 1901 after a body was mistakenly delivered to Whitby instead of Whitley, it was decided to rename both the town and the station to Whitley Bay.
 

TPO

Member
Joined
7 Jun 2018
Messages
348
Woking developed similarly. The original village had grown up around St Peter's church about a mile and a half south-east of the new LSWR station. Initially the new settlement on the north side of the station was called "Woking Station" on OS maps, and there was open countryside between it and Woking village as-was. In time that intervening area was built up, the new town based around the station became Woking, and the original village centre became Old Woking.

Similar situation at Swindon.

TPO
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top