Nick Ashwell
Member
- Joined
- 20 Dec 2018
- Messages
- 391
What happens then if dispensation has not been granted and TfW continue to use them for the sake of continuing to run the services they provide?
Better to run the trains with whatever they've got until further notice,than cancel the many services they already run that utilise the Pacers and LHS trains.
Government interference has caused this impending mess.
The PRM laws for trains should only have been made law for new trains.
As it is,most operators now have to mod their own trains by law or....buy a new fleet of trains!
Astonishing how we let the government interfere.I thought the railways were privatised.
As long as all trains are safe to use and turn up on time,who cares about the toilets.
You really think that six years wasn't enough notice for ROSCOs to make their trains compatible for the requirements? Why shouldn't those with disabilities have the same freedom to use public transport as the able bodied?
The issue here lies with the fact that Arriva had a zero growth franchise and therefore it wasn't their problem. WAG tried to mitigate it somewhat with the orders for 769s and 230s but those programs have been abject failures. Not trying to flog a dead horse but the problem lies with TfW franchise being made devolved with such a short timeframe between the beginning of the franchise and the deadline. If WAG/TfW RS had been sensible they'd have immediately started sending Pacers for Pacer Evolution mods but that wasn't politically viable. If the 769s and 230s had come through as planned we wouldn't be having these problems now. It is not the fault of the legislation and governance but rather the failure of the industry!