DarloRich
Veteran Member
absolutely - but his views on abortion will be the entry point for challenge!Not just abortion. He’s an entry level misogynist anyway.
absolutely - but his views on abortion will be the entry point for challenge!Not just abortion. He’s an entry level misogynist anyway.
Whatever her competency, the US seems to be having a problem with having the same few families all over their politics, which is ironic considering they fought a war to be rid of hereditary rulers.If Michelle Obama put herself forward for the Presidency, with her husband's backing, who in the Democrats would come out against her? She'd be much more likely to win than Harris. There's been plenty of talk about this possibility, even though she undoubtedly has extreme doubts, but might just consider it in order to save democracy (for the moment) in the USA.
Wait until the Trump dynasty take over, they'll be worse than North Korea's leaders. Corrupt judges have now given Donald Trump free reign to do whatever he wants to if he gets re-elected, so in effect a monarchy will be created, with compliant Republican senators and representatives with the exalted, overrated American Constitution amended to his liking with Supreme Court backing. Not hyperbole, guaranteed to happen in a short period of time.Whatever her competency, the US seems to be having a problem with having the same few families all over their politics, which is ironic considering they fought a war to be rid of hereditary rulers.
People disagree on this, but my reading of the 12th Amendment says definitely not.On another forum of which I’m a member, someone opened a can of worms by asking if it was possible for Harris to have Obama as her vice president nominee, on the basis that if she were elected and then died or became incapacitated whilst in office, would Obama be allowed to take over given that he’s already served two terms as president?
She has no political experience AFAIK. Why would people vote for her.If Michelle Obama put herself forward for the Presidency, with her husband's backing, who in the Democrats would come out against her? She'd be much more likely to win than Harris. There's been plenty of talk about this possibility, even though she undoubtedly has extreme doubts, but might just consider it in order to save democracy (for the moment) in the USA.
Er, Donald Trump had no political experience in 2016....She has no political experience AFAIK. Why would people vote for her.
YesRe Obama, don't think you can serve more than 2 terms. Roosevelt served 4 ( OK died on 4th) so they changed the constitution to prevent it happening again?
Yep and look where that got us.Er, Donald Trump had no political experience in 2016....
January 6th will become known as "Tremendous Trump day": every year on this day the masses will gather to shoot fireworks and from AR-15s directly at government buildings across the country. Then mobs will storm them and capture a "traitor" who will then be hung to death infront of the building. The "Donald Trump saltire", a flag consisting of the confederate cross and Trump's face on each of the four quadrants, will then be raised on every government building, and banners will drop from the walls showing Trump's fist raising defiance shot after the assassination attempt. Trump will then broadcast to the nation his latest propaganda, with everyone proceeding to bow down and "kiss the ring". Secret Service will be on standby to shoot anyone who fails to honour this ritual.Wait until the Trump dynasty take over, they'll be worse than North Korea's leaders. Corrupt judges have now given Donald Trump free reign to do whatever he wants to if he gets re-elected, so in effect a monarchy will be created, with compliant Republican senators and representatives with the exalted, overrated American Constitution amended to his liking with Supreme Court backing. Not hyperbole, guaranteed to happen in a short period of time.
On another forum of which I’m a member, someone opened a can of worms by asking if it was possible for Harris to have Obama as her vice president nominee, on the basis that if she were elected and then died or became incapacitated whilst in office, would Obama be allowed to take over given that he’s already served two terms as president?
Well, Michelle Obama would attract few votes from previous Trump supporters, who were the ones who 'got us' to that point.Yep and look where that got us.
I guess the Supreme Court would need to rule on thatThe overative text of the 22nd amendment as it stands right now:
No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.
I suppose for Barrack's case, he wouldn't be elected to the office of President, he'd assume the office via succession. The restriction is placed upon being elected President.
Yes in 2016 Jeb Bush tried to run but did not make the primaries. His father and brother had already been president of course.Whatever her competency, the US seems to be having a problem with having the same few families all over their politics, which is ironic considering they fought a war to be rid of hereditary rulers.
You choose to overlook:The overative text of the 22nd amendment as it stands right now:
No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.
I suppose for Barrack's case, he wouldn't be elected to the office of President, he'd assume the office via succession. The restriction is placed upon being elected President.
Which is part of the 12th ammendment, so easy to miss when looking at the 22nd.You choose to overlook:
But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice President of the United States.
Because the media want politics to be like reality TV, so go after reality TV stars to become politicians, even though the two should never get mixed up.Obama can't be VP, as he is ineligible to be president again.
Why are some folks obsessed with non-politicians becoming president, Michelle Obama? Still its as crazy as someone on another forum suggesting Melania.![]()
Political crayonista / fantasy dream ticket stuff.Why are some folks obsessed with non-politicians becoming president, Michelle Obama? Still its as crazy as someone on another forum suggesting Melania.![]()
Trump was a non-politician. There's an argument to be made that he still is. Hillary Clinton was a non-politician once too. it didn't stop her gaining two million more votes in 2016 than Trump. Did she complain of a ''stolen Presidency''? Comparing Michelle Obama to the fourth (?) Mrs Trump is an insult, with her background. Michelle Obama would be a shoo-in, as the MAGA cult are well aware and must fear most. In the meantime the Democrats play their stupid games.Obama can't be VP, as he is ineligible to be president again.
Why are some folks obsessed with non-politicians becoming president, Michelle Obama? Still its as crazy as someone on another forum suggesting Melania.![]()
She alwys strikes me as being far too sensible to get involved directly in politics! I think Barack was asked, if he could have stood for a third term, would he have done so - and answered, basically, "No. Michelle wouldn't have let me".Obama can't be VP, as he is ineligible to be president again.
Why are some folks obsessed with non-politicians becoming president, Michelle Obama?
Yes she most certainly did and there extant clips of her saying exactly that. Various media personalities have also pointed the hypocrisy out with comments such as “We are getting to the stage that the other side is going to say “”The election was stolen unless they win”” which is not good”. I will post links tomorrow if you can’t find them.Hillary Clinton was a non-politician once too. it didn't stop her gaining two million more votes in 2016 than Trump. Did she complain of a ''stolen Presidency''?
Yeah that worked out well.Trump was a non-politician.
Trump was a non-politician. There's an argument to be made that he still is. Hillary Clinton was a non-politician once too. it didn't stop her gaining two million more votes in 2016 than Trump.
Yes she most certainly did and there extant clips of her saying exactly that. Various media personalities have also pointed the hypocrisy out with comments such as “We are getting to the stage that the other side is going to say “”The election was stolen unless they win”” which is not good”. I will post links tomorrow if you can’t find them.
is the electoral college in need of reform? probablyI'm not sure what she said, but realistically - unlike Trump in 2020, there was a good case in 2016 for arguing that the election was stolen from the Democrats because Hilary Clinton did actually get millions more votes than Trump did (Clinton got about 66 million votes, Trump about 63 million). It was despite Clinton's victory in the popular vote that the US's ridiculous electoral college system caused Trump to be declared the winner and therefore installed as president.