Mgameing123
Member
It's simple. Brits complain when you build anything to do with railways but enjoy it once its up & running.
Yup, I've no reason not to!He managed to get Matt Lucas in one of his earlier solo videos, so I believe him!
Do any projects run to time and on budget in this country?
From what I have seen you add 30% to the budgetted amount before signing on the line, and expect a budget increase on the 30% to be negotiated later on.
Technically HS1 was somehow on time and early - it’s success spurred on HS2 and Crossrail…Take some recent huge projects like:
Jubilee Line Extension
Millennium Dome (The o2)
HS1
Olympic Park
Elizabeth Line
The overspend and delays are rapidly forgotten and end up looking like a bit of loose change in years to come. Does anyone seriously believe the projects abouve shouldn't have been built?
Corrected this!It's simple. Brits complain when you build anythingto do with railwaysbut enjoy it once its up & running.
What definition are you using? It had to be bailed out (twice?) by the government and split into two separate phasesTechnically HS1 was somehow on time and early - it’s success spurred on HS2 and Crossrail…
I was going off the post-Railtrack consortium, but even looking into it again the price per mile is shocking compared to our European counterparts.What definition are you using? It had to be bailed out (twice?) by the government and split into two separate phases
Construction project never run on time and on budget, not only in the UK, the rest of Europe, Asian, and American as well. 30% over budget is not too bad. For example, The HK's 9 mile sha tin central link's budget rising from HK$37.4 billion in initial planning, to HK$79.8 billion when construction started, and end up with costing HK $90.7 billion.Do any projects run to time and on budget in this country?
From what I have seen you add 30% to the budgetted amount before signing on the line, and expect a budget increase on the 30% to be negotiated later on.
Nobody's surprised. Maybe just appalled.Just this. I never understand why anyone bar the press (who want to sell papers/advertise) are ever surprised.
They rarely complain if its a motorway or dual carriageway.Technically HS1 was somehow on time and early - it’s success spurred on HS2 and Crossrail…
Corrected this!
Take some recent huge projects like:
Jubilee Line Extension
Millennium Dome (The o2)
HS1
Olympic Park
Elizabeth Line
Technically HS1 was somehow on time and early - it’s success spurred on HS2 and Crossrail…
They do in well managed organisations. Using project managers who understand their own organisation, construction, and only progress to managing large projects after demonstrating success with lots of smaller projects. It also helps to have Investment Appraisal staff who are similarly experienced and who can ask the right questions in terms of costs/pricing and can ensure optional aspects of a project are fully justified.Construction project never run on time and on budget,
Tell that to the Twyford Down protesters!They rarely complain if its a motorway or dual carriageway.
Looking at research. Not many hated on the project compared to HS2.Tell that to the Twyford Down protesters!
They rarely complain if its a motorway or dual carriageway.
Nice that there are people who do protest about road projects.Have you forgotten the battles over the A303 in the 90s? and as mentioned, Twyford Down, and so forth. That was back when protesters were generally seen as cranks, too.
You have to remember that the period when the management of the project was going awry and the public was being lied to was when the Mayor of London was a certain Boris Johnson. There is no rational explanation of why he was chosen to be in a position to deliver so many non funny jokes.The national joke is that the original management team were financially well rewarded for basically misleading TfL but equal culprits were Jacobs that were also paid handsomely to provide independent oversight to TfL but failed to provide any warning of the fiasco that be felled the project in 2018.
The worst outcome from this is now an approach on the likes of HS2 where we have an opening window now four years long for phase 1 that even after a couple of years construction still can't be narrowed. There is no way private companies could operate with this level of uncertainty on when an investment will start earning income. Even govt borrowed money cost 4% a year so by teh time HS2 have spent 50B on phase 1 those four years could add another 8B in interest charges. Its utterly unbelievable that this is just being accepted needs a JFK approach and set a hard deadline focuses mind.
Of course they do, there are plenty of substantial, competently-run examples.Construction project never run on time and on budget, not only in the UK, the rest of Europe, Asian, and American as well. 30% over budget is not too bad.
You have to remember that the period when the management of the project was going awry and the public was being lied to was when the Mayor of London was a certain Boris Johnson......
Terry Morgan was chair of Crossrail from 2009 to, I think, July 2018, when the government appointed him to the equivalent post at HS2, just weeks before the gross delay at Crossrail was made public. Teresa May was PM at the time, and Morgan was dismissed by her from HS2 when the Crossrail delay finally came to light. It's easy to say that politicians should have the responsibility, and although it's true they ultimately do, they are very considerably dependent on the advice they receive from their well-paid professional staff.The government gave the Crossrail project too much independence, too little oversight.
These tyoes of majoe projects often run over budget and get delivered late. It's frustrating but they're generally massive, ,unique projects where it's very difficult to prediuct exactly what will happen on the ground once construction starts.
You then get politicians trying to shave the budget and de-scope during construction which often only adds to the the final cost and delay. All this aided and abetted by the media.
Take some recent huge projects like:
Jubilee Line Extension
Millennium Dome (The o2)
HS1
Olympic Park
Elizabeth Line
The overspend and delays are rapidly forgotten and end up looking like a bit of loose change in years to come. Does anyone seriously believe the projects abouve shouldn't have been built?
They never caught up as they delayed its opening several times albeit Covid was an acceptable excuse for one of them.Wrong !
Boris Johnson left the mayor's office in 2016.
The period when the project came off the rails and lies were being told, only months before the delays were announced, was the summer and autumn of 2018.
Khan was effectively part of it, but early on, realised he'd better distance himself from the unfolding scandal.
Thankfully, the rejigging of the project management and bringing in qualified professionals with solid reputations, to run it, not only got the project back on course, but did a fantastic job of catching up and sorting out some serious difficulties.
.
Jacobs were employed as independent reporters at a cost of over £30m to provide just that oversight but they allowed themselves to be duped by the project teams and clearly didn't ask the right questions. Then you have the London Assembly transport committee which along with the chairs were utterly inept and had the wool pulled over their eyes because they didn't know what to ask and they too easily accepted BS.No mayor is to blame. The government gave the Crossrail project too much independence, too little oversight.
Agreed but the area was a hideously polluted former gas works site and something needed to be done with it. Much of the cost was dealing with decontaminating the ground which had to happen anyway, and would always have had to be paid for by the Government as this would’ve been a liability from the nationalised gas industry.The dome has always been questionable, indeed its first incarnation was pretty forgettable.