GusB
Established Member
We've advanced a few years. It was 1975 at the last count...You told me I'm "welcome to live in 1979 if you want".
We've advanced a few years. It was 1975 at the last count...You told me I'm "welcome to live in 1979 if you want".
Royal Mail is primarily a postal service which happens to deliver parcels, and therefore makes significantly less money compared to dedicated international parcel delivery companies like DPD and Hermes, who are much more capable of affording state of the art GPS real-time parcel tracking systems. Incidentally, things like that cost a lot of money to purchase and then maintain once it's been implemented. Have you not actually considered the fact Royal Mail might like to introduce such a service for their customers, but may not be able to afford to right now?
It is a bit chicken and egg though.
For as long as Royal Mail continue to offer an inferior service for a higher cost compared to its competition, it will continue to make less money from parcels.
If they actually invested and provided a superior service, then maybe they would actually win back custom that has gone to companies like DPD and Hermes?
They certainly aren't going to improve by not doing anything whilst the competition improves even futher.
Royal Mail is hampered by its universal service obligation to deliver to every address for a uniform cost, which private companies are not obligated to do so indeed they will either jack up the price or give it Royal Mail to deliver if it's very remote and pocket the difference.
The universal service obligation doesn't absolve them of being a rubbish parcel courier, though, that's more about letters.
If you really want Royal Mail to move forward you either ditch the USO or pay more, you can't have both.
We've advanced a few years. It was 1975 at the last count...
Royal Mail don't just deliver letters, they also deliver packets and parcels this includes going to outlying Scottish islands or deepest Wales...
The USO was originally a guarantee by law in exchange for Postal monopoly, we've lost the monopoly and still obligated to carry out the USO, while private companies cherry pick the bits they want.
If you really want Royal Mail to move forward you either ditch the USO or pay more, you can't have both.
The problem is, some people want things now, without giving any consideration to reasonable factors which might get in the way of that, and any company which fails to provide anything other than 100% perfection is deemed incompetent and outdated.
I wouldn't ditch it, but I'd suggest that if it is felt that the USO is something that the UK should have, then it should be subsidised from general taxation and not cause a competitive disadvantage to RM. That said, I'm sure it's also a benefit to them as they have exclusivity on some aspects of letter post to go with it.
Except we aren't asking for perfection.
We are asking why it is acceptable that Royal Mail have a tracking system that is so vastly inferior to their competitors.
Taxpayer money funding a privately owned company? That'll go down well.
Except we aren't asking for perfection.
We are asking why it is acceptable that Royal Mail have a tracking system that is so vastly inferior to their competitors.
What use is the example that gswindale gave? Telling the customer that "tracking information only available once we've attempted delivery"? It is just bloody pointless!
Royal Mail providing a tracking service with more updates would indeed be useful (but it really isn't a necessity), however, if you want a courier-style tracking service, then it'll have to be paid for with increased postal charges.
Precisely. As I said it isn't my job to deal with what's going on inside a business, that's for their management to deal with. What I'm interested in is the offering to consumers, and for Royal Mail it's markedly inferior to many of the others at present. That's all that matters. I don't work for them, therefore what goes on inside the company is of no relevance to me and does not and should not influence my choices. It's fundamentally not my problem.
Letting a contract for USO letter/parcel delivery to non-profitable destinations is no different to letting a contract to empty bins or run buses or trains.
What use is the example that gswindale gave? Telling the customer that "tracking information only available once we've attempted delivery"? It is just bloody pointless!
It lets people know there's no point going to pick it up before it's available.
This thread is a bit of a mountain from a molehill. Suggesting that a profitable business is on its last legs and deserves to fail, that the country should move to twice a week letter collections, and that there are some fundamental, yet predictably unexplained, problems caused by outdated practices and unions is, I think it's reasonable to say, a fairly extreme reaction to a parcel being delayed.
If I wanted to go out I'd not order something I must be in to receive on that day, or I'd just go out anyway, knowing that more than likely my neighbour will be in to take it in. I'm surprised nobody seems to have mentioned delivery to neighbours, a big advantage Royal Mail has over a courier which won't do it.
If I wanted to go out I'd not order something I must be in to receive on that day, or I'd just go out anyway, knowing that more than likely my neighbour will be in to take it in. I'm surprised nobody seems to have mentioned delivery to neighbours, a big advantage Royal Mail has over a courier which won't do it.
If I wanted to go out I'd not order something I must be in to receive on that day, or I'd just go out anyway, knowing that more than likely my neighbour will be in to take it in. I'm surprised nobody seems to have mentioned delivery to neighbours, a big advantage Royal Mail has over a courier which won't do it.
But Royal Mail will not tell you in advance, on which day the parcel will arrive! If Royal Mail were to email me on Tuesday to tell me it will be coming on Thursday afternoon (or even just, some point on Thursday) then I could make arrangements to swap shifts/work from home etc on that day. Clearly most people will be unable to do this (pre-Covid, anyway) if they order something and then have to wait in the house for a week or however long in case it happens to turn up on one of the days.
Where's the "like" button?
Everything you've said is absolutely spot on.
But Royal Mail will not tell you in advance, on which day the parcel will arrive! If Royal Mail were to email me on Tuesday to tell me it will be coming on Thursday afternoon (or even just, some point on Thursday) then I could make arrangements to swap shifts/work from home etc on that day. Clearly most people will be unable to do this (pre-Covid, anyway) if they order something and then have to wait in the house for a week or however long in case it happens to turn up on one of the days
I've never had any warning in advance from Royal Mail that a parcel was coming.That's strange, I always get a text message (a day in advance, or two if it's a Saturday and due on Monday) telling me what day my parcel is due for delivery.
In terms of delivery to neighbours, certainly DPD and Hermes allow it so not sure what courier you are thinking of that doesn't.
If you're not interested in listening to the factors which are behind the existence of Royal Mail's "markedly inferior" parcel tracking service, then what's the point of this thread?
It lets people know there's no point going to pick it up before it's available.
This thread is a bit of a mountain from a molehill. Suggesting that a profitable business is on its last legs and deserves to fail, that the country should move to twice a week letter collections, and that there are some fundamental, yet predictably unexplained, problems caused by outdated practices and unions is, I think it's reasonable to say, a fairly extreme reaction to a parcel being delayed.
If I wanted to go out I'd not order something I must be in to receive on that day
I'd just go out anyway, knowing that more than likely my neighbour will be in to take it in. I'm surprised nobody seems to have mentioned delivery to neighbours, a big advantage Royal Mail has over a courier which won't do it.
I've never had any warning in advance from Royal Mail that a parcel was coming.
Yes they will, if the sender has used a service that offers that. My email has many messages in doing exactly that, and where I've given the sender my number I've had texts too. If the sender just takes the parcel to the post office and sticks a stamp on it then obviously it won't be tracked but it's incorrect to say Royal Mail don't do these things.
I've never had any warning in advance from Royal Mail that a parcel was coming.