• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

TransPennine class 397

InOban

Established Member
Joined
12 Mar 2017
Messages
4,388
I think coach D is always unreserved - it was announced as such when we travelled back from Manchester to Edinburgh. There is no doubt that the introduction of the fast regular Anglo-Scottish services from Manchester has been exceptionally successful - and not just for end-to-end traffic. Lockerbie can never have had so many trains, making is easy to pop into Carlisle for example.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
17,793
Location
East Anglia
The biggest issue with the 397's is reliability, I know TPE are trying to improve it but mostly at the moment they're running trains with faults instead of fixing them.

Thank you.

I think the issue is cost, unless they can add the extra carriages onto the LNER order or CAF come out on top of the current bidding for new trains.
Yes, the Avanti platform staff commented its like this most days.
 

TT-ONR-NRN

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
11,539
Location
Salford Quays, Manchester
No idea why it's taken me so long but today is the first time that I've travelled on a 397. I honestly cannot fault it. The queue for the 09:09 to Manchester Airport w/ent right across Glasgow Central concourse filling me with some trepidation but needn't have worried as several spare unreserved seats in coach D. Carlisle was reached a few minutes early giving plenty of time for the Settle & Carlisle Leeds connection.
I think they're a great example of how nice the 80x could look with some attention to design. The Nova 1 (802) has a far blander, much more sterile and uninspiring interior, yet with the same colour and design scheme as the 397s they could be really nice.
 

Russel

Established Member
Joined
30 Jun 2022
Messages
2,329
Location
Whittington
I've only used one once, between Penrith and Lancaster and couldn't really fault it.

I suppose it did help that it was during 2020 so I had an entire carriage to myself...
 

voyagerdude220

Established Member
Joined
13 Oct 2005
Messages
3,504
Just out of curiosity, does anyone know how quickly 397s accelerate compared with say 390s?

I thought the 397s I've been on over the last few months accelerated very quickly.
 

driver9000

Established Member
Joined
13 Jan 2008
Messages
4,396
Just out of curiosity, does anyone know how quickly 397s accelerate compared with say 390s?

I thought the 397s I've been on over the last few months accelerated very quickly.

They do accelerate very quickly. Going south from Preston a 397 will reach 110mph just before Leyland and going north 110mph is reached around Barton & Broughton. I don't know how that compares to a 390 though.
 

Toby268

Member
Joined
13 Jan 2022
Messages
140
Location
Glasgow
They do accelerate very quickly. Going south from Preston a 397 will reach 110mph just before Leyland and going north 110mph is reached around Barton & Broughton. I don't know how that compares to a 390 though.
390s on a clear run are doing between 100-110 through Leyland station.

390s also reach 110 at the northern end of Barton and Broughton loop.
 

Russel

Established Member
Joined
30 Jun 2022
Messages
2,329
Location
Whittington
Just out of curiosity, does anyone know how quickly 397s accelerate compared with say 390s?

I thought the 397s I've been on over the last few months accelerated very quickly.

They are 20 years younger than the 390's, so will be a lot more advanced and no doubt lighter so I'd expect the performance to be at least level with the 390's.
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
17,793
Location
East Anglia
I think they're a great example of how nice the 80x could look with some attention to design. The Nova 1 (802) has a far blander, much more sterile and uninspiring interior, yet with the same colour and design scheme as the 397s they could be really nice.

Yes I know these things are all cosmetic but they seemed very pleasant to me. Enjoyed doing the northern half of the WCML. Onboard team very friendly and helpful to people too.
 

Scotrail314209

Established Member
Joined
1 Feb 2017
Messages
2,444
Location
Edinburgh
I think coach D is always unreserved - it was announced as such when we travelled back from Manchester to Edinburgh. There is no doubt that the introduction of the fast regular Anglo-Scottish services from Manchester has been exceptionally successful - and not just for end-to-end traffic. Lockerbie can never have had so many trains, making is easy to pop into Carlisle for example.
Carriage D is unreserved on all trains. However at busier periods the higher numbers of Coach D can and will be used for reservations as well, akin to Coach C on LNER.
 

Jamesrob637

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2016
Messages
5,639
The biggest issue with the 397's is reliability, I know TPE are trying to improve it but mostly at the moment they're running trains with faults instead of fixing them.


I think the issue is cost, unless they can add the extra carriages onto the LNER order or CAF come out on top of the current bidding for new trains.

My 397 from Manchester to Edinburgh two weeks ago got turned back at Preston towards Manchester Airport. Another 397 took passengers onward to bonny Scotland. I changed onto a Pendo as I was Glasgow-bound.

My experience of 397s, however, is fairly positive. They just need maybe 2 more carriages, as previous posts have alluded to.
 

Lg_

Member
Joined
29 Jun 2023
Messages
25
Location
Lancashire
My 397 from Manchester to Edinburgh two weeks ago got turned back at Preston towards Manchester Airport. Another 397 took passengers onward to bonny Scotland. I changed onto a Pendo as I was Glasgow-bound.

My experience of 397s, however, is fairly positive. They just need maybe 2 more carriages, as previous posts have alluded to.
Generally swapping units at Preston is so they can get a train back to Manchester at the end of the night for repair.

Either that or it has a fault that network rail won’t allow on the WCML.
 

route101

Established Member
Joined
16 May 2010
Messages
11,291
The 397s certainly were a step up fro the 350s and 185s on the route. The seats are not comfortable though and ride can be poor. Not quite Intercity to me, more regional.
 

Jamesrob637

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2016
Messages
5,639
The 397s certainly were a step up fro the 350s and 185s on the route. The seats are not comfortable though and ride can be poor. Not quite Intercity to me, more regional.

A 397 is better than a single 350, but a small step below a double 350, capacity-wise
 

driverd

Member
Joined
29 Mar 2021
Messages
697
Location
UK
No idea why it's taken me so long but today is the first time that I've travelled on a 397. I honestly cannot fault it. The queue for the 09:09 to Manchester Airport w/ent right across Glasgow Central concourse filling me with some trepidation but needn't have worried as several spare unreserved seats in coach D. Carlisle was reached a few minutes early giving plenty of time for the Settle & Carlisle Leeds connection.

I completely agree. They're probably the best new train since around 2015(ish - here someone will quote one I've forgotten). They cover all the attention to detail very nicely - I particularly like the way the windows are lower in the saloon to facilitate a better view and that seat/window alignment has been well thought out throughout the unit. I much prefer the styling to an 80x too!

It's a shame TPE seem to be having so many issues, but hopefully once they get on top of them, they seem to have a quite excellent and (atleast for 2024) special train.
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
17,793
Location
East Anglia
I completely agree. They're probably the best new train since around 2015(ish - here someone will quote one I've forgotten). They cover all the attention to detail very nicely - I particularly like the way the windows are lower in the saloon to facilitate a better view and that seat/window alignment has been well thought out throughout the unit. I much prefer the styling to an 80x too!

It's a shame TPE seem to be having so many issues, but hopefully once they get on top of them, they seem to have a quite excellent and (atleast for 2024) special train.

I hope they do mate. Apart from their day to day reliability they are a pleasant medium to long distance train.
 
Joined
13 Jan 2024
Messages
381
Location
Cambridge
I completely agree. They're probably the best new train since around 2015(ish - here someone will quote one I've forgotten). They cover all the attention to detail very nicely - I particularly like the way the windows are lower in the saloon to facilitate a better view and that seat/window alignment has been well thought out throughout the unit. I much prefer the styling to an 80x too!

It's a shame TPE seem to be having so many issues, but hopefully once they get on top of them, they seem to have a quite excellent and (atleast for 2024) special train.
No 755s are the best
 

Wilts Wanderer

Established Member
Joined
21 Nov 2016
Messages
2,946
I’m afraid something with poor ride characteristics can have all the curtains, well aligned windows and other amenities in the catalogue, it still fails at its basic task and gets 1/10 from me.
 

Rob F

Member
Joined
17 Dec 2015
Messages
406
Location
Notts
I’m afraid something with poor ride characteristics can have all the curtains, well aligned windows and other amenities in the catalogue, it still fails at its basic task and gets 1/10 from me.
And when you couple poor ride characteristics with rock hard seats, you are really not onto a winner.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
103,967
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
I’m afraid something with poor ride characteristics can have all the curtains, well aligned windows and other amenities in the catalogue, it still fails at its basic task and gets 1/10 from me.

Having been on both a 397 and an 802 this weekend, I didn't note much difference in ride (both are a bit hard), but the 397 does have a higher quality environment overall. It's in essence the "Class 344" I've wanted to see for a long time (an AC 444, albeit from a different manufacturer).

However, I think it has too many tables and too few airline seats - half and half is about the right balance.
 

TheHovisKid

Member
Joined
9 Sep 2008
Messages
275
Location
Heysham
I use 397s a lot. Fast and airy, but bumpy. The seats are as almost all sears are.
I also get an 802 quite often on a Saturday. Nothing to write home about, and the vestibules are more cramped, and isse with 5 car sets at peaks, The services they work load increasingly well.

A 397 at 125 could be interesting...
 

hexagon789

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Sep 2016
Messages
16,931
Location
Glasgow
Is using an 802 on the West Coast a regular thing?


Off to a bad start it seems and it was binned at Oxenholme.
Yes, there's a Manchester/Edinburgh Diagram booked 802.

A second WCML 802 Diagram will be happening in the near future to accommodate the 397 refresh/heavy maintenance works.
 

Top