• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Trivia: Downsized stations that are shells of their former selves?

Joined
28 Nov 2021
Messages
241
Location
Leith
Ironically, it now has the most frequent service to Exeter in its history - sadly no trains to Budleigh and Sidmouth Jcn though. The old station was demolished for a hideous 'distributor' road that cuts it off from the town centre. The motoring lobby are still at it - the council proposed to fill in the subway and make a pedestrian-friendly at-grade crossing - only to receive a storm of protest and have now backtracked.

I suspect that there quite a number of the stations that have been mentioned in this thread have better services now - at least in terms of numbers of departures - than when they were at their largest, mainly as a result of the trend towards regular interval services throughout the day. That might be true of Exmouth? I was thinking of March, which as mentioned at post #24 has gone from 7 platforms down to 2, but currently has about 48 departures a day; I feel that is probably more than it had in the 1900s or 1930s, when it had lines to Wisbech, Spalding and St Ives as well as the surviving ones to Peterborough and Ely. Though it's a guess, I may be quite wrong in that case! Difficult to prove without a lot of digging into old timetables.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Topological

Established Member
Joined
20 Feb 2023
Messages
1,880
Location
Swansea
Operations are much more efficient too. There is a lot less occasional traffic as well. Platform occupancy is a lot lower.

The DMU turning round in Exmouth now can do so without much fuss and there are no parcels to unload.

A second platform at Exmouth might help resilience, but 4 would not be necessary for any service needs that are likely to arise in the foreseeable.
 

Pnerick81

Member
Joined
5 Jan 2024
Messages
18
Location
Bamber bridge
Lostock hall. Now I know it was a mass of lines , signalbox and huge engine shed . Now just 2 tracks through the station with Farington chord junction just east of the station which joins from the wcml . Was lostock hall always a 2 platform station . I’m unsure .
 
Last edited:
Joined
3 Mar 2020
Messages
506
Location
Furness
Morecambe is certainly right up there in being only a shell of it's former self: From a decent sized station with a roof and lots of facilities to one island platform without any shelter at all when the ticket office is closed. I'm not sure exactly what motivated the move to the present location, but my guess was that BR probably wanted the cash from selling the old site.

I'd question whether the new location is actually less useful though. The old station on the seafront was fine if you were a tourist looking for the beach, but was also quite a walk from the town centre. The new station is halfway between the seafront and the town centre so a bit meh for either place but still better than the old one if the town centre is where you are heading.
Mum said that Euston road was easier for the shops and closer to town. The bus station ( as was) was in the town as well. The station by the Midland Hotel was alright in the ☀️ summer but a right faff in the rain.
 

MadMac

Established Member
Joined
13 Jun 2008
Messages
1,217
Location
Moorpark, CA
It would also make sense in the near future to downscale Stranraer even more and truncate the line as without the ferries it's stuck at the end of a pier for no reason
There has been talk on and off about re-routing to the old Stranraer Town station, but it’s debatable if it’s any more convenient.
 

MichaelTrains

Member
Joined
9 Jun 2022
Messages
205
Location
Bradford
Yes, with arguably the better of the surviving islands mouldering away. Ironically I don’t think it’s ever had a better service level. I live in hope for at least a third platform reinstatement
It certainly needs an extra platform for the Hull terminators. The amount of times that service gets curtailed to Bradford and then causes issues at the Interchange by blocking platforms and trains (usually the 36 past to Huddersfield) is crazy.

You could argue Bradford Interchange also needs an additional platform, especially with the Grand Central services so close together.
 

steamybrian

Established Member
Joined
26 Nov 2010
Messages
1,865
Location
Kent
Feniton was in its previous life Sidmouth Junction- a three platform junction station with goods yard and sidings. Closed and reopened as a single platform station with no sidings.
 

uglymonkey

Member
Joined
10 Aug 2018
Messages
613
Lostock hall. Now I know it was a mass of lines , signalbox and huge engine shed . Now just 2 tracks through the station with Farington chord junction just east of the station which joins from the wcml . Was lostock hall always a 2 platform station . I’m unsure .
It only needed 4 platforms for the Exmouth and Tipton St John branches when they were both open, 2 platforms for arrivals, for steam trains ( with run round loops) and 2 for departures. Once the DMU's arrived in 1964? It only needed 2, and once Tipon shut it only needed 1. Don't think there is space Topsham- Exmouth for double track ( could be mistaken) but Topsham-Exeter used to be double track before about 1973?
 

JBuchananGB

Established Member
Joined
30 Jan 2017
Messages
1,201
Location
Southport
Southport. Only 6 platforms now, from at least 12 in the past. Station buildings demolished in 1960s and replaced with a hideous shopping centre.
 

Pnerick81

Member
Joined
5 Jan 2024
Messages
18
Location
Bamber bridge
It only needed 4 platforms for the Exmouth and Tipton St John branches when they were both open, 2 platforms for arrivals, for steam trains ( with run round loops) and 2 for departures. Once the DMU's arrived in 1964? It only needed 2, and once Tipon shut it only needed 1. Don't think there is space Topsham- Exmouth for double track ( could be mistaken) but Topsham-Exeter used to be double track before about 1973?
Lostock hall is between Preston and Bamber bridge in Lancashire . I think you might have replied to the wrong comment
 

Sir Felix Pole

Established Member
Joined
21 Oct 2012
Messages
1,366
Location
Wilmslow
It only needed 4 platforms for the Exmouth and Tipton St John branches when they were both open, 2 platforms for arrivals, for steam trains ( with run round loops) and 2 for departures. Once the DMU's arrived in 1964? It only needed 2, and once Tipon shut it only needed 1. Don't think there is space Topsham- Exmouth for double track ( could be mistaken) but Topsham-Exeter used to be double track before about 1973?
Exmouth Jcn to Topsham was double-track but Topsham to Exmouth always single-track. One problem with redoubling the former is that the later bridges over the A379 Link Road and M5 were built as single-track.

To be fair, the old station did also have to handle through coaches to Waterloo and complete trains on Summer Saturdays. There was even an exotic Summer Saturday Exmouth to Cleethorpes and v.v. service in the late '50s / early '60s.
 

Mikey C

Established Member
Joined
11 Feb 2013
Messages
7,566
Ironically, it now has the most frequent service to Exeter in its history - sadly no trains to Budleigh and Sidmouth Jcn though. The old station was demolished for a hideous 'distributor' road that cuts it off from the town centre. The motoring lobby are still at it - the council proposed to fill in the subway and make a pedestrian-friendly at-grade crossing - only to receive a storm of protest and have now backtracked.
There already is a zebra crossing anyway, so the current choice of the subway or a surface crossing seems perfectly ok to me.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
41,548
Location
Yorks
Operations are much more efficient too. There is a lot less occasional traffic as well. Platform occupancy is a lot lower.

The DMU turning round in Exmouth now can do so without much fuss and there are no parcels to unload.

A second platform at Exmouth might help resilience, but 4 would not be necessary for any service needs that are likely to arise in the foreseeable.

Exmouth also had the line east via Budleigh Salterton then as well.
 

a_c_skinner

Established Member
Joined
21 Jun 2013
Messages
1,623
Morecambe is certainly right up there in being only a shell of it's former self: From a decent sized station with a roof and lots of facilities to one island platform without any shelter at all when the ticket office is closed. I'm not sure exactly what motivated the move to the present location, but my guess was that BR probably wanted the cash from selling the old site.

I'd question whether the new location is actually less useful though. The old station on the seafront was fine if you were a tourist looking for the beach, but was also quite a walk from the town centre. The new station is halfway between the seafront and the town centre so a bit meh for either place but still better than the old one if the town centre is where you are heading.
That is fair, I only ever go to the Midland Hotel and Morrisons! I realised I didn't know that much about the setup but a look on old maps (from National Library of Scotland an excellent resource on www) shows an interesting disposition of the two former stations and on the whole a good rationalisation of the two lines to Morecambe, even to the point of reusing the old bridge over the Lune in Lancaster. But it does hurt me whenever I walk past the old Morecambe Promenade station. Lets hope the Eden Project keeps Morecambe on its slow economic recovery.
 

FtoE

Member
Joined
27 Jul 2015
Messages
78
I visited Morecambe last year and was surprised at how … modest the station was. For a fair-sized town and a popular day trip place I thought the platform felt like a bus stop.
 
Joined
3 Mar 2020
Messages
506
Location
Furness
I visited Morecambe last year and was surprised at how … modest the station was. For a fair-sized town and a popular day trip place I thought the platform felt like a bus stop.
For many years it was served by 'nodding donkeys' 142 trains so it was a bus stop
 

TheHovisKid

Member
Joined
9 Sep 2008
Messages
276
Location
Heysham
There were plans at one time to have 24 platforms, a fish dock, an overall roof, and to double balloon sidings around Broadway Bridge.
 

HOOVER29

Member
Joined
26 Mar 2009
Messages
518
Crewe?

Ok it’s foot print is still the same size as it was back in the late 70’s/80’s but less usable platforms.

Everytime I use the train from the midlands we sit by the carriage sidings for a couple of minutes while awaiting a platform

The station is a dump compared to how it used to be.
 

trainmania100

Established Member
Joined
8 Nov 2015
Messages
2,736
Location
Newhaven
Preston park had 4 platforms but now only has 3.
Newhaven harbour also had a third platform, it's used as a nature area now.
 

DynamicSpirit

Established Member
Joined
12 Apr 2012
Messages
8,912
Location
SE London
Crewe?

Ok it’s foot print is still the same size as it was back in the late 70’s/80’s but less usable platforms.

Everytime I use the train from the midlands we sit by the carriage sidings for a couple of minutes while awaiting a platform

The station is a dump compared to how it used to be.

Has Crewe really lost platforms? Even if it has, that description doesn't seem to me to qualify as 'shell of its former self'. Waiting a couple of minutes awaiting a platform most likely reflects that Crewe is served by significantly more trains per hour than would have been the case in the 1970s. And whenever I've been there recently, it's been quite a bustling, busy station full of life.

I also seem to recall back in the 1970s non-stopping trains had to crawl through the station because of super-low speed limits, which is certainly not the case now - so some things have definitely improved.
 

Topological

Established Member
Joined
20 Feb 2023
Messages
1,880
Location
Swansea
Has Crewe really lost platforms? Even if it has, that description doesn't seem to me to qualify as 'shell of its former self'. Waiting a couple of minutes awaiting a platform most likely reflects that Crewe is served by significantly more trains per hour than would have been the case in the 1970s. And whenever I've been there recently, it's been quite a bustling, busy station full of life.

I also seem to recall back in the 1970s non-stopping trains had to crawl through the station because of super-low speed limits, which is certainly not the case now - so some things have definitely improved.
Crewe was one of my suggestions a few pages back. There is a whole island of bays which is now just platform 12. The photo below from Wikipedia shows the unused island in 2005. The in use section can be made out from the newer looking white roof that covers the footbridge at the south end. Platform 12 can be seen with a red brick building similar to that on the platform 1/5 island and the 6/11 island. I am certain the roof no longer reaches platform 12.

Rth_Crewe_A-G_30.08.05R_edited-2.jpg
 

Huntergreed

Established Member
Associate Staff
Events Co-ordinator
Joined
16 Jan 2016
Messages
3,097
Location
Dumfries
Dumfries - used to be a terminus for many local services on the port road and had quite a number of direct services to various intercity destinations, including London Euston trains (and a sleeper).

Now, an hourly sprinter to Carlisle and an approximately 2-hourly service north, at best. Sundays are abysmal.

Admittedly, not a physical ‘downsize’ (although 2 bay platforms are now a car park) but service has been completely slashed.
 

drb61

Member
Joined
24 Oct 2020
Messages
67
Location
Cambuslang
Surprised Newton (Lanarkshire) hasn't been mentioned yet. Used to have four platforms but long since reduced to two on the Hamilton road. Although an access link to the WCML remains at the east end of the platforms, it is rarely used (essentially only for Cathcart Circle diversions). It would be good to see the main line platforms restored so that Lanark and Shotts services could more easily call (without having to switch to / from the existing platforms) and provide better interchange with the Kirkhill line services. The current timetable provides poor connectivity with Argyle line and Kirkhill services (that used to connect before the last timetable recast) now often pulling into the platforms simultaneously.
 

Discuss223

Member
Joined
30 Oct 2024
Messages
375
Location
Rowsley
What stations are there in the uk which are shadows of what they used to be? I mean it in the sense of, did the station have more platforms which are now abandoned or if the station was once busy but now not. March in Cambridgeshire springs to mind for me as it had 7 platforms and now only has 2 operational ones with the rest rotting away. Any other such examples?
Skegness station used to be bustling before the days of the package holiday abroad. There are several platforms that sit unused for most of the day.

I believe Hartlepool station also used to be two platforms with more services, these days, the only "facilities" you can guarantee will be available there are the ticket gates. I was told by staff to use the pub across the road if I needed the toilet.

Penistone station in Yorkshire also used to have another platform and was on the route up to Manchester, with more services than today. The booking office building is still in place but no longer used as such.
 

Killingworth

Established Member
Joined
30 May 2018
Messages
5,707
Location
Sheffield
Dore & Totley, once a 4 platform junction station with waiting rooms and toilets on all of them and a W H Smiths kiosk. By 1985 reduced to a single platform with a basic open shelter and no toilets. Second platform restored in 2024.
 

QBall21

Member
Joined
16 Jul 2024
Messages
12
Location
Helensburgh
Craigendoran, in eastern Helensburgh.

It used to have five platforms, two at the pier, two going to Helensburgh/Glasgow, and one on the West Highland Line.
The whole piers gone now, absolutely no sign it was ever there. Highland platform gone too; you can still see the steps going up (although they are blocked off) and only one of the two mainline platforms has survived, when the line was singled.

Look up some old photos from the 50s and 60s - its completely unrecognisable, and it actually seems unbelievable that everything was there since there's no trace of it anymore.
 

Top