• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

TRIVIA: How Far North Has A Unit With 3rd Rail Shoes Reached?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Dr Hoo

Established Member
Joined
10 Nov 2015
Messages
3,957
Location
Hope Valley
Possibly worth an honourable mention for the Giant's Causeway Electric Tramway. This was the first third rail line 'up north' and practically on the same latitude as North Shields. (The Glasgow Subway was cable-hauled for many years and not in historical contention until the 1930s.)
 
Joined
9 Sep 2008
Messages
10
Were they then? ... and when ?:rolleyes::rolleyes:
A 37 hauling a rake of doomed 313's into oblivion would be sad, but worth looking at. Bit gloomy though .. :(:(
 
Joined
9 Sep 2008
Messages
10
I was at Hornsey last week and glimpsed a pair of Colas 56 or 57's getting ready to exit
Ferme Park towing a rake of 313's on their final journey north ...
 
Joined
9 Sep 2008
Messages
10
If nobody wants to bother to reply to a posting (with exception - thanks- to "midnight Sun"|), I feel as a new communicant
that I will not be attempting to share my observations on our hobby with you all in future. You've obviously all far more
entrenched and cosily established.
I honestly thought that the fate of the 313's and my observations on the Blyth and Tyne possible regeneration might have
sparked some interesting discussion. Obviously not.
So thanks and goodnight. Enjoy our hobby.
 

driver9000

Established Member
Joined
13 Jan 2008
Messages
4,243
The hell were they doing up there??! Haha :lol:

13 February 2010 on a Driver training trip for GBRf before the Alcan tanks were taken over from DB Schenker. The units were used to give the Drivers a chance to haul a train over the route.
 

AndrewE

Established Member
Joined
9 Nov 2015
Messages
5,096
If nobody wants to bother to reply to a posting (with exception - thanks- to "midnight Sun"|), I feel as a new communicant that I will not be attempting to share my observations on our hobby with you all in future. You've obviously all far more
entrenched and cosily established.
I honestly thought that the fate of the 313's and my observations on the Blyth and Tyne possible regeneration might have sparked some interesting discussion. Obviously not.
So thanks and goodnight. Enjoy our hobby.
I don't know what has upset you, unless it is the almost obligatory joke about a 442! I thought all the replies were perfectly reasonable, especially as the thread title implies has ever reached. Some info new to most of us has come out about driver training, which makes it all the more inexplicable that TPE drivers haven't had much in the way of practice hauling stock yet.
Cheerio.
 

haggishunter

Member
Joined
25 Aug 2016
Messages
349
Doesn’t the Cairngorm Funicular (when it is working) have some sort of power pick-up for lighting and other auxiliaries?

Not on track, everything is powered by batteries which are charged by short overhead charging rigs that the cars dock with in both terminal stations. There is no charging rig at the mid-station due to it being uncovered and alternators were not allowed on the cars following the Kitzsteinhorn Gletscherbahn fire. Thus when the funicular is mid*-stopping in both the up and down direction the extra duration out of station requires a longer recharging period and limits the funicular to running at 15min frequency at most. Design capacity of 1200 persons per hour per direction requires a departure every 6 minutes with a 2.5minute journey and 3.5minute turn around (which in real life has never been close to being achieved because of the procedures in place and normal journey time is around 6-8 minutes).

* the 'mid' station is below, not at the passing loop as it was put in the same place as the former chairlift interchange and the upper White Lady Chairlift was longer.
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
16,706
I can remember GBRf's 73s going north before then, but thought they were 73/9s without shoes. There's a big risk that even if they're in gauge you'll lose them at some point to a high ballast shoulder.
I thought Class 73 shoes were retractable?
 

Dr Hoo

Established Member
Joined
10 Nov 2015
Messages
3,957
Location
Hope Valley
Not on track, everything is powered by batteries which are charged by short overhead charging rigs that the cars dock with in both terminal stations. There is no charging rig at the mid-station due to it being uncovered and alternators were not allowed on the cars following the Kitzsteinhorn Gletscherbahn fire. Thus when the funicular is mid*-stopping in both the up and down direction the extra duration out of station requires a longer recharging period and limits the funicular to running at 15min frequency at most. Design capacity of 1200 persons per hour per direction requires a departure every 6 minutes with a 2.5minute journey and 3.5minute turn around (which in real life has never been close to being achieved because of the procedures in place and normal journey time is around 6-8 minutes).

* the 'mid' station is below, not at the passing loop as it was put in the same place as the former chairlift interchange and the upper White Lady Chairlift was longer.
Thank you for very helpful reply. This Forum is a mine of enlightenment.
 

Killingworth

Established Member
Joined
30 May 2018
Messages
4,871
Location
Sheffield
Just spotted reference to Tyneside electrics, third rail in revenue earning service from 1904 until 1967. The North Tyneside 1930s rolling stock had wonderful deep bucket seats and the doors slid. By the end they weren't sliding very well and it wasn't uncommon to see a train leave with a door half open, and not unknown almost fully open! I got my first car soon after, the reduced frequency of the diesel service a small factor.

The South Tyneside branch had only recently acquired Southern rolling stock when the decision was made not to upgrade the electricity sub-stations and go over to diesel. With compartments and no corridor I recall thinking they were much inferior units, but they did load quicker.

But furthest north regular 3rd rail operation must go to the Glasgow Subway.
 

RLBH

Member
Joined
17 May 2018
Messages
962
Thus when the funicular is mid*-stopping in both the up and down direction the extra duration out of station requires a longer recharging period and limits the funicular to running at 15min frequency at most. Design capacity of 1200 persons per hour per direction requires a departure every 6 minutes with a 2.5minute journey and 3.5minute turn around (which in real life has never been close to being achieved because of the procedures in place and normal journey time is around 6-8 minutes).
Which incidentally equates to 480 uplifts per hour with mid stops. Or 960 per hour if everyone gets off at the mid station and another full trainload get on, but then all the extra loading and unloading would bugger the journey time.

So far as the passing loop goes, some of the early concepts featured a new Sheiling complex that would have located the station at the passing loop. I'm not sure if that would have involved a higher Sheiling or lowering the loop by extending the line downhill another 140 metres; this would put the bottom station in the lower car park, which has its' merits as an idea.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,382
Was that what was called "The TyneRider" ? i remember those - we had Geordie relations in those days
Getting well away from the subject, but from what I remember the “TyneRider” marketing and fares stuff was an attempt to increase ridership in the early 70s well after the EMUs had finished.
 

Dr Hoo

Established Member
Joined
10 Nov 2015
Messages
3,957
Location
Hope Valley
How often do 325s actually operate on 3rd rail? I've never seen them on any of the SE, Southern or SW networks, albeit I've been on the former an awful lot more than the latter.
They used to run to the purpose-built terminal at Tonbridge. That stopped many years ago.
 
Last edited:

Train Maniac

Member
Joined
28 Sep 2018
Messages
375
Are you sure?
mlv_rm_1990.jpg

(Picture not mine) Its was the 419 MLV units that used to run to Tonbridge. The 325's have always been based on the WCML
 

Mag_seven

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
1 Sep 2014
Messages
10,024
Location
here to eternity
So in that case, I believe a pair of 73/9s made it to Kyle last year on a SRPS tour, so unless one has gone north of Dingwall towards Wick the furthest north is around the Gorstan/Garve area.

I think Elgin is slightly further north on the map than Gortsan so I offer up Elgin when the Inverness sleeper is diverted via Aberdeen.
 

Mag_seven

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
1 Sep 2014
Messages
10,024
Location
here to eternity
Has a 73 gone via Elgin or has it been 67s?

It was on the back of my mind that the Inverness portion has been in the hands of 67s lately but I'm sure someone reported being on an Inverness - Aberdeen sleeper diversion and that a 73 was involved even if only hauled dead behind the 67.
 

Kite159

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
19,237
Location
West of Andover
It was on the back of my mind that the Inverness portion has been in the hands of 67s lately but I'm sure someone reported being on an Inverness - Aberdeen sleeper diversion and that a 73 was involved even if only hauled dead behind the 67.

Maybe in the "ED & Shed" months when the Inverness part was a 66 with the 73 for train supply
 

Belperpete

Established Member
Joined
17 Aug 2018
Messages
1,645
If nobody wants to bother to reply .... I will not be attempting to share my observations on our hobby with you all in future. ...... I honestly thought that the fate of the 313's and my observations on the Blyth and Tyne possible regeneration might have sparked some interesting discussion. Obviously not. So thanks and goodnight.
Having looked back at his string of postings, the first two are almost unintelligible, and in others he just seems to be agreeing with what others have already said. I cannot see any observations on possible B&T regeneration, and anyway I am not sure what that or the fate of the 313s has to do with the topic under discussion. I am not exactly surprised that nobody replied.
 

ForTheLoveOf

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2017
Messages
6,416
When I recently did the Inverness sleeper that was diverted via Aberdeen, it was a 67 IIRC.
 

Cowley

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
15 Apr 2016
Messages
15,766
Location
Devon
Having looked back at his string of postings, the first two are almost unintelligible, and in others he just seems to be agreeing with what others have already said. I cannot see any observations on possible B&T regeneration, and anyway I am not sure what that or the fate of the 313s has to do with the topic under discussion. I am not exactly surprised that nobody replied.
Quite unusual to be a member of the forum for 11 years but not post anything until last Wednesday, then posting 10 times in two and a half hours in the middle of the night before deciding we’re all gits and disappearing again.
Welcome to the forum Peter. ;)
 

dubscottie

Member
Joined
4 Apr 2010
Messages
916
A 507 or 508 made it to Rosyth Dockyard. Not sure if the shoes were removed though. There is a picture of it sitting in Inverkeithing yard somewhere.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top