uvarvu
Member
- Joined
- 5 Apr 2016
- Messages
- 90
Willesden Junction
See post #15.Willesden Junction
I admire your dedication to asking people to read the thread first!See post #15.
Ditto with Tempsford/St Neots South.Many moons away is that
Invariably the case, on threads such as this, that folk "late to the party" don't always read the earlier posts.I admire your dedication to asking people to read the thread first!
And when the Waterloo & City was still mainline owned, could Waterloo claim three levels?Historically (pre National Rail), London Waterloo?
What are the two levels without the Waterloo and City though?And when the Waterloo & City was still mainline owned, could Waterloo claim three levels?
Liverpool Central also has platforms on two levels.
Yes, someone wrongly suggested earlier the main and East stations were split level, but they‘re definitely the same, but the OP ruled them out as being separate. Now you could possibly argue that the former international station was slightly higher cos it was built level, but it’s only a slight difference, about a metre at the buffers?I was thinking two levels with the mainline and w&c
Waterloo East was previously called Waterloo and it's definitely at a higher level than the mainline station. So three levels with the W&C.I was thinking two levels with the mainline and w&c
That was me.Yes, someone wrongly suggested earlier the main and East stations were split level, but they‘re definitely the same, but the OP ruled them out as being separate.
Moot point. Templecombe Lower station was a separate platform used only by one arrival a week!Historically Templecombe.
Only in the last 20-30 years.That was me.
Waterloo East always seems to be at a higher level as you first have to go up the stairs/escalator from the main concourse at Waterloo station when interchanging.
Given that there was a rail link between the two in the C19th, definitely an illusion.Not 100% sure if there's any difference in elevation or if it's an illusion.
That was me.
Waterloo East always seems to be at a higher level as you first have to go up the stairs/escalator from the main concourse at Waterloo station when interchanging there.
Not 100% sure if there's actually any difference in elevation or if it's an illusion.
Up and down the height changes are effectively the same, before the rebuild in the 1920s there was a single track connection across the Waterloo Road bridge which is at concourse level, it’s well below the present footbridge.Waterloo East was previously called Waterloo and it's definitely at a higher level than the mainline station. So three levels with the W&C.
Just how old are you?!...remember before the rebuild in the 1920s there was a single track connection...
Well old enough to remember a detailed thread about it last year…Just how old are you?!
If we're counting small differences in elevation, what about Gospel Oak - three steps up from the NLL platforms to the GOBLIN platform.how much does it have to be to qualify as split level? A foot or two?
Around the same area, Sutton Coldfield used to have a high-level, and it might be restored in the next few years under West Midlands Rail Executive plans. Although I don't trust that'll happen just yet.
Two separate stations. The "Low Level" one, rarely used but a survivor, was about 10 minutes walk along a road from the main one.Historically Templecombe.
you could probably have a whole thread discussing whether it is or not!Could Liskeard be shoe horned into this list (I suspect not)