railfan100
On Moderation
Firstly, this has been the case for a lot longer than simply since BR disappeared.
Secondly, peak fares are used at peak times when demand is greatest. BR systematically increased peak fares well above inflation for years to price demand off to the available capacity. This is not an option for the railway now that fares are regulated.
I agree in principal that fares were too high under BR but now it simply feels that they are way out of control. A system that offers value for money will take traffic away from the roads also if the system has a true cost base that is competitive it will also remove a significant number of HGV's from long-distance trips.
I see no solution from the TOC operating model that can address the issues to the point that results are delivered and it can catch up with countries that lead the way in having a rail network that offers the public very good value walk on peak fares. The bureaucratic nature and high cost base of the network today has no strategy to run a network that is lean, efficient and reasonable value to run and operate.
The comparision of a peak walk on return fare of 80 miles costing £10 in NSW, Australia is an interesting comparsion to a trip of a simlar mileage in the UK such as Rugby to London (around 80 miles is £50. As I say salaries typically are higher in Australia as well. The people are being fleeced by the system in the UK as it stands today with the walk on prices.