LOL The Irony
On Moderation
Whichever you want was my intention.Does the answer depend on whether you view the question with Beeching era eyes or modern eyes? i.e. taking account of subsequent developments or not?
Whichever you want was my intention.Does the answer depend on whether you view the question with Beeching era eyes or modern eyes? i.e. taking account of subsequent developments or not?
You have a time machine to take you back to the 1960's, what are some unfulfilled Beeching cuts you would've made? Be it for practical or selfish reasons, say which cuts that were left on the cutting room floor you would go ahead with. For instance, Keeping Blackpool Central and closing North.
My (purely selfish) pick would be closing the route between Chester and Warrington.
I answer it in the post you quoted before even mentioning what line I would close.Why? It's well used.
Really? The area round New Beckenham is relatively 'leafy'. Where does the clientele for the plethora of private schools south of Croydon come from?There was a private school at Sanderstead, but I doubt it’s clientele would have come from the Mid Kent line.
The line via Berney Arms is arguably extant for reasons other than the station on the route. Double track via Acle might allow its removal but the link from Great Yarmouth to Reedham would be lost also. The line exists to give more capacity between Norwich and Great Yarmouth as much as anything.Berney Arms?
It's a lovely quirk, but removing it would get rid of an entire section of route so the saving would be considerable.
I answer it in the post you quoted before even mentioning what line I would close.
Keep up at the back!You said selfish, but you haven't really explained why the closure would benefit you?
Does it benefit you in any way for that line to be closed - I guess it would send all of the Manchester to North Wales services via Altrincham instead, which might be useful if you live on that line?
It would also send more than that my wayBingo. I fully agree with and understand it not closing, but come on.
Correct, of which Dulwich took the most (even getting a special stop on an Orpington-Victoria "fast" in the 1967 timetable). Plus St Dunstan's, St Olave's... - all taking significant numbers of local authority funded pupils into the 70s BTW.The clientele for Croydon area private schools is currently well spread, with significant train travel from Clapham Jct and from points south, eg Oxted. I know New Beckenham is leafy, my best guess is that Dulwich, Alleyn’s and James Alleyn’s Girls’ School were the schools of choice in those days.
Correct, of which Dulwich took the most (even getting a special stop on an Orpington-Victoria "fast" in the 1967 timetable). Plus St Dunstan's, St Olave's... - all taking significant numbers of local authority funded pupils into the 70s BTW.
I think one option at one point was truncating the Hope Valley line and keeping Woodhead, rather than the other way round. I'd probably have done that.
If I was going to close anything round there it'd be Ellesmere Port to Helsby, but I don't know if that was on the list, was it?
Agreed - based on the information at the time, Hope Valley looked like the weakest of the three - obviously BR subsequently closed the Woodhead line when the coal traffic dwindled (and Woodhead required the complications of a separate station in Sheffield) - I guess that keeping Hope Valley open allowed BR to also close the Bakewell line, which is why they chose to do so, but the Good Doctor wanted to keep Woodhead and close Hope Valley, and I think he was probably right and BR wrong
(obviously all things that Beeching closed were because he was part of a wicked conspiracy with Marples whilst all of the things that BR closed weren't their fault but all because the Big Bad Government forced them to and BR were entirely blameless etc etc)
The Hope valley line also has sources of bulk/trainload freight at Hope cement works and the Peak Forest quarry traffic which Woodhead didn’t.Later management regimes of BR were IMO correct to choose (when forced) to keep the Hope over Woodhead as it had better intermediate passenger potential and it went to the better connected station in Sheffield.
The Good Doctor was not some separate entity from BR, he was Chairman at the time (although he was part of a wicked bad policy conspiracy with Marples)
Later management regimes of BR were IMO correct to choose (when forced) to keep the Hope over Woodhead as it had better intermediate passenger potential and it went to the better connected station in Sheffield.
I appreciate that he was the Chairman - I'm just highlighting the usual double standards whereby his actions were seen as entirely down to him/Marples (i.e. if it wasn't for this one baddie then we'd still have thousands of quaint little branch lines) whereas every cut made under BR is seen as an unavoidable consequence of the Government not giving them enough money, "BR didn't want to close anything but those wicked politicians forced them to" (especially when used with "in order to fatten up BR for privatisation", which absolved the nationalised railway further, by blaming privatisation for the fact that the nationalised railway continued to close lines/stations pretty much every year between Beeching and privatisation)
e.g. "it may have looked like BR wanted to close the Settle & Carlisle between 1984 and 1989 but this wasn't BR's fault, it was because the nasty Tories were forcing their hand" whereas "BR were amazing because they were doing all of these positive things in the 1980s with InterCity/ Network South East etc" (you need the cognitive dissonance to separate all of the "pros" from the "cons")
Yes, it seems logical now, butI would have kept Wennington-Green Ayre-Lancaster Castle and shut Wennington-Carnforth. Thus accelerating the service from Yorkshire to Lancaster/Morecambe by approx 15 minutes.
Most pit workers lived in the area so didn't need to commute. The passenger services survived until January 1983 (I suppose that technically is the "mid-1980s") due to there being no secondary school in the area, meaning local kids had to travel to Honley. Shelley High School opened in the late 1970s, though not all families immediately transferred their kids to the new place.The Clayton West branch off the Penistone Line survived perhaps longer than necessary, unless there was pit (workers) traffic? It only branched from the Huddersfield direction and ran two stops, but survived until the mid-1980s when, I think, WYPTA made it (and singling) conditional on future support for the route in West Yorkshire.
Thanks - it's those hyperlocal things such as pits and schools that explain why services still run at odd times to odd places (buses included). I did mean singling the rest of the Penistone Line route though, I just expressed myself poorly. Going from memory, South Yorkshire still wanted to run the old route via Deepcar and had to be persuaded to accept the longer route via Barnsley once everything was agreed and funded.Most pit workers lived in the area so didn't need to commute. The passenger services survived until January 1983 (I suppose that technically is the "mid-1980s") due to there being no secondary school in the area, meaning local kids had to travel to Honley. Shelley High School opened in the late 1970s, though not all families immediately transferred their kids to the new place.
Once the pit closed and the operating burden of the line fell solely on the infrequent passenger services, WYPTE refused to support the line (which had always been single, though with several structures built to accommodate double track).
Would never have happened: the County Council wanted Greyhound bridge for a road.I would have kept Wennington-Green Ayre-Lancaster Castle and shut Wennington-Carnforth. Thus accelerating the service from Yorkshire to Lancaster/Morecambe by approx 15 minutes.
1. Not sure about this. Surely Morecambe only relatively important for a few summer weekends' holiday traffic which the Doctor identified as uneconomicYes, it seems logical now, but
1. Morecambe not Lancaster was the more important destination, so back then there was logic to going directly there.
2. What would you have done with the freight traffic?
Freight traffic seems to have been mainly for the Trimpell works at Heysham, so not a problem.Yes, it seems logical now, but
1. Morecambe not Lancaster was the more important destination, so back then there was logic to going directly there.
2. What would you have done with the freight traffic?
St Erth to St Ives - it has a good bus service, was this reprieve necessary? Could have worked on integrated through tickets - although always challenging
The singling of Huddersfield to Clayton West Junction (end of the current passing loop) took place throughout the mid to late 1980s. The service along the line was seldom more than 1tph, so the double track wasn't really needed once the coal traffic had ended. Singling also improved clearances in several locations, allowing modest improvements in speed.Thanks - it's those hyperlocal things such as pits and schools that explain why services still run at odd times to odd places (buses included). I did mean singling the rest of the Penistone Line route though, I just expressed myself poorly. Going from memory, South Yorkshire still wanted to run the old route via Deepcar and had to be persuaded to accept the longer route via Barnsley once everything was agreed and funded.
You have a time machine to take you back to the 1960's, what are some unfulfilled Beeching cuts you would've made? Be it for practical or selfish reasons, say which cuts that were left on the cutting room floor you would go ahead with. For instance, Keeping Blackpool Central and closing North.
My (purely selfish) pick would be closing the route between Chester and Warrington.
I'm not sure this is relevant but, having lived through the period, I'll append it anyway. Richard Marsh, son of a railwayman, ex MP for Greenwich, ex cabinet minister in Harold Wilson's government (including nationalising the steel industry), when he became Chairman of BR was frequently accused by conspiracy theorists of having an agenda to close railways. He always dismissed this as nonsense but, being an ex politician, he knew better than to blame the Government and the civil servants. He used to point out that railwaymen hated closing lines. I recall him saying on television that "railwaymen bleed whenever a line closes".(obviously all things that Beeching closed were because he was part of a wicked conspiracy with Marples whilst all of the things that BR closed weren't their fault but all because the Big Bad Government forced them to and BR were entirely blameless etc etc)
I'm not sure this is relevant but, having lived through the period, I'll append it anyway. Richard Marsh, son of a railwayman, ex MP for Greenwich, ex cabinet minister in Harold Wilson's government (including nationalising the steel industry), when he became Chairman of BR was frequently accused by conspiracy theorists of having an agenda to close railways. He always dismissed this as nonsense but, being an ex politician, he knew better than to blame the Government and the civil servants. He used to point out that railwaymen hated closing lines. I recall him saying on television that "railwaymen bleed whenever a line closes".