The_Train
Established Member
- Joined
- 2 Jun 2018
- Messages
- 4,365
I will add that to the to do listYep, that’s what I meant.
Keep up the good work, as the website has been quite helpful and informative
Ah, I get you. As you may have been able to tell, the loco class tables are different to the unit class tables in how they are structured. The loco one is the original one I used and is much better in every way (it is much better on the mobile display, it comes with a built in search and sort function & is easier when it comes to inputting info from my point of view) except for it's load times which can be painfully slow. This is because the loco tables are provided by a 3rd party and so when the page is loaded it goes from the host server, to the 3rd party server, back to the host server and then responds on the users screen whereas the unit ones are ones I have developed on the host server and are therefore much quicker to load. I have been considering moving everything to the same as the loco ones just because they offer so much more and that would obviously solve this issue - whilst I continue to mull over this though, I shall see how to implement a sort feature on the unit tables as they are now. Again, this will be added to the to do list.No problem.
Apologies, what I meant with the multiple unit tables was, we can (very usefully) sort the tables for locomotive classes by various criteria such as operator, depot, livery etc. I was thinking that would be really useful to have for the DMU/DEMU/EMU/BMU class tables too.
In the mean-time each table in the units section does have it's own search bar and you can search for anything in there whether it be operator, depot, livery etc so you can filter what is shown by using that and create a sort of sorts. I appreciate this limits what info you see compared to all info remaining visible when you just sort but it might be useful in the short term whilst I create a sort
Thanks both for your suggestions