Flamingo
Established Member
- Joined
- 26 Apr 2010
- Messages
- 6,810
They shouldn't be in the QC anyway if they are that vociferous
Ah, you noticed
They shouldn't be in the QC anyway if they are that vociferous
Productive use of time I have no problem with. My point was that some act like they have a right to be allowed to work undisturbed. Generally the people that try to grab two seats and 3/4 of a table because they need the space. I sometimes do work on the train but most of the time can't because of the nature of the work I do. And I never agree to 'catch up' when I get home. Very rarely is something so important that it can't wait until the next day.It's not that people are 'important', it's just that some people would like to make productive use of their travelling time - so that time out of the office isn't wasted and when they eventually do get home, they can spend time with their family rather than catching up on work. YMMV.
I would agree with you about anything involving TPE and Northern other than very rural branch lines. I don't find VT Standard particularly unpleasant - the seating is a bit cramped and some seats don't have windows, but there really are worse things in the world. As for joining busy services at Lime St, can you allow a bit longer for your connection and join first? Letting trains go such that I can board a longer time before departure at Euston (or be standing right next to the door if they're not unlocked yet) is my trick for having a near 100% record of getting a seat when commuting.
But I think the quiet zone thing is more of a symptom of an increasing greater problem - of overcrowding, of people who have no consideration for others (e.g. by listening to/watching films with the volume up in a public area) and similar.
You should maybe try LM south WCML commuter services some time. There are no marked quiet coaches because *all* coaches are de-facto quiet coaches. Make a racket and you will get tutted at at the very least...
Trains or no trains, I think we can say that that is definitely a favourable outcome - to your health, to traffic congestion, to how busy the trains are etc. Cycling is to be very much encouraged.
At the end of the day people don't have a right to a quiet journey to work. As I've asked before how do they cope when in the office if they need silence to work.
At the end of the day people don't have a right to a quiet journey to work. As I've asked before how do they cope when in the office if they need silence to work. Indeed people may be put off train travel if Virgin do away with quiet zones but I am guessing a company that size have done a bit of research first (Maybe even working on the train!). If you don't like it you can drive which some people claim to find more relaxing. I personally don't find being stuck in a car more relaxing but who am I to say. All of these technological advances were meant to make our lives easier. Instead we are living further away from work and doing work on the journey there and back without a shorter day in the office. You pays your money and takes your choice.
And the award for most hysterical thread title of the year goes to...
Good.
Noise happens. If you want silence, go and buy a place in the country and work from home. If you can't stand noise other people make, then perhaps travelling on a train full of people isn't the best option for you.
I think the OP is very anti Virgin, judging by their other thread title of "Virgin Trains is worse than state-run East Coast - again (removal of 1ST quiet coach)"
I agree, this is another thing that a few passengers are trying to claim as a birthright for themselves to the detriment of the majority. If those who's lifestyle choice is to treat trains as a 'Regus on rails' then their opportunity to expect normal passengers to sit there in silence looks like ending. Their 'work-life balance' is nothing to do with the provision of public transport facilities. They will just have to get over it!
Virgin have made a commercial decision that they will make more revenue from a train without a quiet carriage than from a train with one. That's entirely their choice as a franchised train operator. The OP thinks it's a retrograde step, and has said so.
What is it about this thread that is causing people to make the most ranty, unnecessarily personalised judgements?
You don't mind noise. That's fine, that's your choice. Other people prefer quiet. That's fine too, that's their choice.
Virgin have made a commercial decision that they will make more revenue from a train without a quiet carriage than from a train with one. That's entirely their choice as a franchised train operator. The OP thinks it's a retrograde step, and has said so.
But there is absolutely no call for you to write such a snitty, sneering paragraph as the above just because you happen to have a different opinion from the OP (and others in this thread). If you really have such furious disdain for anyone who might have a different opinion to you, I worry for your blood pressure.
I don't particularly like certain types of noise, e.g. screaming babies, music not played via headphones, loud phone conversations to mane a few, but I don't expect to have to sit in stony silence just because some think that they are entitled to it.
Why will Virgn make more revenue from a train without a quiet carriage? They either sell the seats or they don't.
If customers avoid a "Quiet Carrage" it makes the train seem more packed than it is, which ultimately can detract from everyones experience.
Spreading the load more evenly makes it seem less packed.
It's a QUIET carriage, not a SILENT one. There is also a choice (usually) to not sit in the quiet carriage if the lack of noise offends or upsets anyone.
Just so. And it's only necessary because the general standard of behaviour in public and respect for one's fellow citizens (travellers in this case) has declined so much in the egocentric society.
The child problem is a slightly different one. I'm sure we've all seen the young child with a mother well prepared for the journey looking after the child and keeping it occupied, with the consequence that the child causes no disturbance whatsoever for others in the coach. But for every one of those there seem to be three or four whose parents are so busy with their music or their drinks that they do nothing to keep their brat occupied, resulting in major disturbance for everyone else. But modern lousy parenting is certainly not just confined to quiet coaches on the trains ....
To be fair, (as all parents on here can vouch for) there are times when NOTHING you do can stop a child crying or playing up...
So, when is all this supposed to be happening? I'm happily sitting in Coach H on a Euston bound Pendolino and all the Quiet Coach signs are up and people are respecting them.
I have to say I find the venom directed against supporters of a Quiet Coach astonishing. What's wrong with having a small part of the train designated for those who prefer not to listen to loud mobile phone conversations or someone else's choice of music? On a standard Pendolino there are five other standard and four first carriages. For everyone who wants to make calls. The suggestion by some posters that people should pay extra for this is ridiculous.
Note, the term is 'Quiet' not 'Silent' I don't expect everyone to sit there like statues. I also would not expect these zones on commuter trains. But, on long distance services such as the WCML it's something a lot of travellers find a benefit.
It's Getting done in stages. 9 cars first as they go for conversion to 6 standard cars, iirc the 11s are getting done from September
In post 116 you say it isn't being done. Now you're saying it is being done but in stages. Which one is it