• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Voyagers faster than Pendolinos?

Status
Not open for further replies.

route:oxford

Established Member
Joined
1 Nov 2008
Messages
4,949
I stopped travelling from Scotland direct to Oxford in 2012 due to the nuisance of changing trains at Brum and the scrum at Wolverhampton on the way south.

It also tends to be cheaper to take the X90 to Baker Street then walk along to Kings Cross for an East Coast service... Ridiculous pre 9am XC fares don't help.

I thought I'd give the XC/WC route another try but find that now the post Pendolinisation Birmingham - Scotland services are timetabled for around 4h15m instead of the post-Voyagerisation schedule of 3h59m.

National rail enquiries actually recommends people disembark from the 9-car/11-car Pendolino and pile onto the usually 4-car Voyager!

What's going on?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Urban Gateline

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2011
Messages
1,651
Not sure about their top speed, but Voyagers can certainly accelerate faster than Pendolinos!
 

WestCoast

Established Member
Joined
19 Jun 2010
Messages
5,637
Location
South Yorkshire
I stopped travelling from Scotland direct to Oxford in 2012 due to the nuisance of changing trains at Brum and the scrum at Wolverhampton on the way south.

It also tends to be cheaper to take the X90 to Baker Street then walk along to Kings Cross for an East Coast service... Ridiculous pre 9am XC fares don't help.

I thought I'd give the XC/WC route another try but find that now the post Pendolinisation Birmingham - Scotland services are timetabled for around 4h15m instead of the post-Voyagerisation schedule of 3h59m.

National rail enquiries actually recommends people disembark from the 9-car/11-car Pendolino and pile onto the usually 4-car Voyager!

What's going on?

I'm a regular between Birmingham and Preston and since the Wolverhampton - Euston and Birmingham New Street - Scotland services have been merged there appears to be an extended wait of around 10 minutes at Wolves on many services. This padding is presumably due to pathing requirements and to factor in delays. In fact, it now means the LM Birmingham - Liverpool services are generally quicker between Birmingham and Crewe.
 
Last edited:

TOCDriver

Member
Joined
24 Jan 2013
Messages
609
Voyagers will be able to out accelerate the pendolino if they have less weight to pull per horsepower, which is currently the case.
 

driver_m

Established Member
Joined
8 Nov 2011
Messages
2,248
Voyagers will be able to out accelerate the pendolino if they have less weight to pull per horsepower, which is currently the case.

I've never seen the two types go off at the same time. But as a comparison. (highly unscientific) a pendo leaving MK heading north on the down fast will be doing easily over 80 when shutting off at the neutral whether 9/11 cars in eco or boost mode. A 221 will be doing about 75-80. A 350 will leave both for dead from a standing start and takes some time to catch one up.
 

MidnightFlyer

Veteran Member
Joined
16 May 2010
Messages
12,856
IIRC, Pendolinos tend to be marginally quicker over longer non-stop stretches, but the differences are hardly noticeable.
 

Beveridges

Established Member
Joined
8 Sep 2010
Messages
2,136
Location
BLACKPOOL
Numerous Cross Country Voyagers are only running on 3 or 4 engines (out of 5) which means noticeably slower acceleration than a Pendolino.
 

Carlisle

Established Member
Joined
26 Aug 2012
Messages
4,316
Voyagers will be able to out accelerate the pendolino if they have less weight to pull per horsepower, which is currently the case.

Also thought I read that voyagers tilted a few degrees less (at max tilt) than pendilinos resulting is slightly lower EPS speeds for them round some curves on the WCML :oops:
 
Last edited:

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
17,825
Location
East Anglia
Could be something to do with the booked layover (12 mins I think) at Wolverhampton that started last December to combine the Scotland-Brum with the Wolves-Euston.
 

route:oxford

Established Member
Joined
1 Nov 2008
Messages
4,949
Could be something to do with the booked layover (12 mins I think) at Wolverhampton that started last December to combine the Scotland-Brum with the Wolves-Euston.

This, from a passenger perspective, simply doesn't make sense...

Why put on a 9/11 car train to take passengers as far Wolverhampton then tell them to disembark and board an already packed 4 car Voyager to reach their destination 15 minutes quicker?
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
21,043
Location
Mold, Clwyd
It's purely down to the way the Euston-Wolverhampton and Birmingham-Scotland legs were merged, with longer dwell times at these stations.

While some EPS speeds for Voyagers are less than Pendolinos (because they have a lower maximum tilt capability), it is hardly noticeable in the schedules.
The nn07 Euston-Liverpool 390 is given 94 minutes to Crewe (one stop at Stafford).
The nn10 Euston-Chester 221 is given 97 minutes (one stop at Milton Keynes).
 

andyb2706

Member
Joined
21 Jan 2013
Messages
747
Location
Manchester
It must be something to do with the timings on the southern section of the WC because hasn't the Voyagers had their tilt mode removed by XC so that when you get up into Cumbria they can not take advantage of the Enhanced Passenger Speeds of the Pendos?
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
21,043
Location
Mold, Clwyd
It must be something to do with the timings on the southern section of the WC because hasn't the Voyagers had their tilt mode removed by XC so that when you get up into Cumbria they can not take advantage of the Enhanced Passenger Speeds of the Pendos?

XC don't operate through Cumbria any more.
All VT's Voyagers are 221s and can tilt.

TP's services though (185 and 350) can't, so are limited to 100/110mph and non-EPS speeds.
 

driver_m

Established Member
Joined
8 Nov 2011
Messages
2,248
It must be something to do with the timings on the southern section of the WC because hasn't the Voyagers had their tilt mode removed by XC so that when you get up into Cumbria they can not take advantage of the Enhanced Passenger Speeds of the Pendos?

XC 221's have had their tilt isolated permanently whereas ours are fully tilting on all the WCML. Timings for a 221 are slightly longer than a 390 ie 13 mins Euston-Watford whereas a 390 is 12 mins. It takes a 221 quite a bit longer to reach 125mph.
 

Boodiggy

Member
Joined
8 Nov 2012
Messages
642
Also thought I read that voyagers tilted a few degrees less (at max tilt) than pendilinos resulting is slightly lower EPS speeds for them round some curves on the WCML :oops:


That is correct, there are quite a few locations on the wcml this happens
 

Warbonnet

Member
Joined
11 Jan 2014
Messages
43
Anyone know the horse power rating of a Pendolino?
I know that the 221's are 750 HP per car. (Cummins QSK19)
That's a fair bit of poke for a 5 car set.
 

TOCDriver

Member
Joined
24 Jan 2013
Messages
609
Anyone know the horse power rating of a Pendolino?
I know that the 221's are 750 HP per car. (Cummins QSK19)
That's a fair bit of poke for a 5 car set.

They're at least 5,000 horsepower. Torque, I don't know - and torque is more important when it comes to acceleration. My bet is, is that the Pendolino, pulling equal mass under idenitical conditions, would easily out accelerate a voyager simply because it's torque (or pulling power) is instantly available, unlike the diesel engine which has to come on boost, and that takes a bit of time.
 
Last edited:

Nym

Established Member
Joined
2 Mar 2007
Messages
9,437
Location
Somewhere, not in London
They're at least 5,000 horsepower. Torque, I don't know - and torque is more important when it comes to acceleration. My bet is, is that the Pendolino, pulling equal mass under idenitical conditions, would easily out accelerate a voyager simply because it's torque (or pulling power) is instantly available, unlike the diesel engine which has to come on boost, and that takes a bit of time.

No it doesn't. It's a Diesel Electric that provides a generated DC busline to IGBT invertors, the same as what happens at the end state drives on Class 221s. It's not like the diesel electrics of old that are directly linked.

It's just that the generators don't go to full for the first couple of seconds (mainly because you could never use it).
 
Last edited:

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
18,574
Also AIUI the power of a Pendolino is measured at its wheelhubs, whereas the power of a Voyager is based on the output of its QSK-9s which is measured at the alternator.
1hp on a Pendo gets you more than 1hp on a Voyager for this reason.
 

222001

Member
Joined
1 Sep 2006
Messages
727
Location
Chesterfield
A Voyager will out accelerate a 390 up to about 60mph where they lose their edge. The power on the Voyager is at the lower end of the speed range. A 390 would easily beat a Voyager up to 125.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top