PP57601
Member
- Joined
- 3 Jun 2019
- Messages
- 16
Coombe no.1 GF - Coombe Halt ?
There’s no way that the West Highland Line falls into that category when it’s running 7 carriage trains that are busy, and a sleeper train. If instead you mean the West Highland Extension, I’d suggest that if Jacobite passengers were included even that wouldn’t be near the bottom of the list.Least Used and Least Profitable are not necessarily exactly correlative, but I suspect the total passenger numbers on the Brigg, Far North, West Highland and Heart of Wales lines will take some beating.
And that’s another point. NR lines don’t sit like tube ones, services venture down many lines. The ECML is incredibly well used, do we count the pax from The Highland Chieftain as ECML pax or Highland Mainline ones for example.How are we defining ‘used’? Or for that matter, ‘line’?
There’s no way that the West Highland Line falls into that category when it’s running 7 carriage trains that are busy, and a sleeper train. If instead you mean the West Highland Extension, I’d suggest that if Jacobite passengers were included even that wouldn’t be near the bottom of the list.
Aren't there a couple of daily Northern workings, each way, SuX, over that particular section of line? Certainly will keep the rust off!Helsby to Ellesmere Port must be up there.
I last travelled on that line (well, Horsham to Holmwood, anyway) was on 29 March to see if the Permit to Travel machine was still there.Dorking to Horsham has to be a very strong contender. That line is always extremely quiet. I have had at least ten occasions now over the years where i have had the entire train to myself for the whole journey. There is rarely more than ten people onboard. You might get twenty maximum on some rare occassions. Even during peak times i have had extremely quiet trains with just a couple others onboard. So even the peak trains are quiet. I use this line regularly and i think it has to be a contender for the least used line in the country. It has always baffled me why it gets such poor usage considering it gets an hourly service and links two major towns.
There are. Must admit I’d read the “least used” as passengers actually using trains as opposed to trains on lines. The Helsby/EP service though is notoriously unreliable and I was more than shocked when “ticking off” Ince and Elton station that it actually turned up.Aren't there a couple of daily Northern workings, each way, SuX, over that particular section of line? Certainly will keep the rust off!
It was reported as costing £760m. Given interest on new Government borrowing costs over 5% pa then it is costing the taxpayer approx £800k/week in interest alone. To sit there unused.The new 20-mile Bletchley-Bicester line must be a very poor performer at the moment, with no revenue-earning trains 8 months after it was declared open for traffic.
Some Chiltern ECS and light loco workings are evident today, presumably road-learning trains.
https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/se...25-06-09/0000-2359?stp=WVS&show=all&order=wtt
With signalling from Rugby, operating costs will at least be low.
Dorking to Horsham has to be a very strong contender. That line is always extremely quiet. I have had at least ten occasions now over the years where i have had the entire train to myself for the whole journey. There is rarely more than ten people onboard. You might get twenty maximum on some rare occassions. Even during peak times i have had extremely quiet trains with just a couple others onboard. So even the peak trains are quiet. I use this line regularly and i think it has to be a contender for the least used line in the country. It has always baffled me why it gets such poor usage considering it gets an hourly service and links two major towns.
It is of course the old Victoria - Portsmouth main line, but the growth of Croydon, Gatwick and Crawley resulted in the progressive diversion of through services. It was seriously considered for closure in the 80s. Although it avoided that fate it is never going to trouble the overcrowding statistics based on locally-generated trafficI suspect it's poorly-used mainly because it runs through an area of extremely high car ownership. Intermediate stations are virtually halts and the journey from London/Croydon to Horsham is far quicker via Gatwick.
Though of course if any passenger services using it require subsidy...It was reported as costing £760m. Given interest on new Government borrowing costs over 5% pa then it is costing the taxpayer approx £800k/week in interest alone. To sit there unused.
There must be a lot of sidings, still attached to the main lines, which haven't had a train on it for years. I'm sure I've seen some rusting away on the Bolton to Manchester line, I'll have a proper look!How are we defining ‘used’? Or for that matter, ‘line’?
Apart from the negative impact of closing any railway, I wonder if delays to dualling the A9 have made the Scottish government reluctant to reduce options for Highland to Central Belt travel, even if a bus to Inverness and trains south of there might be cheaper and quicker.My experience of the Far North is that it’s empty and a complete waste of time North of Dingwall. I was only 1 of 3 passengers until Dingwall on my return from Wick. Obviously, it’s got its defenders on here but it’s incredibly wasteful. However, if the Scottish government is happy to fund it then that’s all that matters really.
I don't know about the recent unused... But Crossley Evans Siding in Shipley is still in situ and with functioning signalling, but hasn't seen a train since 2015 (I believe)? The scrapyard it serves doesn't even exist anymore.There must be a lot of sidings, still attached to the main lines, which haven't had a train on it for years. I'm sure I've seen some rusting away on the Bolton to Manchester line, I'll have a proper look!
So in the spirit of the thread I wonder what is the longest time a rail siding, still attached to a "proper" line, has stood there unused? Maybe one that could still be used (perhaps in emergency)?
Isn't that the place which was getting turned into an EMU depot for when access to Neville Hill is cut off?I don't know about the recent unused... But Crossley Evans Siding in Shipley is still in situ and with functioning signalling, but hasn't seen a train since 2015 (I believe)? The scrapyard it serves doesn't even exist anymore.
How profitable is Reedham to Great Yarmouth? I'm sure there are some people who visit for the novelty of Berney Arms station alone, but I can't imagine Greater Anglia / DfT's finances would be significantly worsened, if not improved, by its closure. On the other hand, it's a six-mile line with twenty (regular passenger) trains per week; is more money spent on ensuring that e.g. Ipswich to Lowestoft has an hourly service?
Reedham-Yarmouth is not just about Berney Arms station. The trains via Berney Arms are part of the overall Norwich-Yarmouth service, and the trains carry a share of the total Yarmouth traffic; the trains won't be empty if nobody gets off or on at Berney Arms. There are also more than 1000 journeys per year each way Yarmouth-Reedham; not a big number but larger than the number of people getting off or on at Berney Arms.How profitable is Reedham to Great Yarmouth? I'm sure there are some people who visit for the novelty of Berney Arms station alone, but I can't imagine Greater Anglia / DfT's finances would be significantly worsened, if not improved, by its closure. On the other hand, it's a six-mile line with twenty (regular passenger) trains per week; is more money spent on ensuring that e.g. Ipswich to Lowestoft has an hourly service?
I am an occasional user of Dorking-Horsham. I agree that off peak it is very quiet.It is of course the old Victoria - Portsmouth main line, but the growth of Croydon, Gatwick and Crawley resulted in the progressive diversion of through services. It was seriously considered for closure in the 80s. Although it avoided that fate it is never going to trouble the overcrowding statistics based on locally-generated traffic
Though anyone going Horsham to Deepdene is making a choice to go the long way round.Care has to be taken with the data which is for Dorking BR and arbitrarily split between Main and Deepdene
My understanding is that the routing of all TPE North services into Piccadilly made the service pretty much redundent. However a lot of TPE North services now use Victoria, so you are back to the situation where if you need South of Manchester or routes that start at Piccadilly and head out through Stockport then you have the perennial headache of the Vic-Pic connection, which adds 30 mins + anyway, and also comes with the added hassle that tram transfer is not included in the rail fare. The nominal hourly service around the Ordsal chord is not much help either.I am 100 percent certain that if you ran an hourly train from Stalybridge to Stockport the passenger numbers would "mysteriously" go up!!
Came to this post to say the exact same thing! Also good to see some sensible energy investment.Until this morning the Leiston (Sizewelll) line was probably a contender here. Now that Sizewelll C has the go-ahead I guess the plan to update the line will also have the green light.
..
Most (all?) will not be making that choice. Most (all?) of the Horsham-Dorking BR journeys are likely to be to/from Dorking(Main) but the ORR algorithm splits them between Dorking (Main) 6.5k and Dorking (Deepdene) 1.4k.Though anyone going Horsham to Deepdene is making a choice to go the long way round.
Personally, I think the sensible solution for this is for a stopper to run from Stockport to Huddersfield operated by Northern, calling all stations in place of the current Manchester-Huddersfield stopper.My understanding is that the routing of all TPE North services into Piccadilly made the service pretty much redundent. However a lot of TPE North services now use Victoria, so you are back to the situation where if you need South of Manchester or routes that start at Piccadilly and head out through Stockport then you have the perennial headache of the Vic-Pic connection, which adds 30 mins + anyway, and also comes with the added hassle that tram transfer is not included in the rail fare. The nominal hourly service around the Ordsal chord is not much help either.
So maybe a half hourly or hourly service, connecting with the TPE North services to and from the east might get some use again. As to how much of a priority it is, I am less sure. Its a shame it couldn't carry on to the Airport, but there is no practical route from Stockport to the airport as far as I can see although tracks do cross. I think a Stalybridge - Airport service might be more popular, avoiding the Manchester changes, particularly by those with luggage, but I realise we are in 'crayon' territory.
Dorking to Horsham has to be a very strong contender. That line is always extremely quiet. I have had at least ten occasions now over the years where i have had the entire train to myself for the whole journey. There is rarely more than ten people onboard. You might get twenty maximum on some rare occassions. Even during peak times i have had extremely quiet trains with just a couple others onboard. So even the peak trains are quiet. I use this line regularly and i think it has to be a contender for the least used line in the country. It has always baffled me why it gets such poor usage considering it gets an hourly service and links two major towns.
The bus is hourly as well and takes double the time and finishes earlier on in the evening. So that is definitely not it. The train is a much better and faster option.I dont know this line, but its very surprising, between two reasonable size towns, is there a better bus service ?