Aureol
Established Member
We know, others have posted the same thing.222s are cleared for that line.
We know, others have posted the same thing.222s are cleared for that line.
We know, others have posted the same thing.
Apparently the refurbished EMT 158s will have 158 seats available...
Yes, those 223s are abysmal trains...
I'm sorry, have I missed something?
Ever been in an SWT 158/159? I'd guess not. The seats are brilliant, lovely and comfy, nice and sturdy, far better than the current ones.slowly will be reduced by each one gradually snapping off cos they're cheap![]()
Ever been in an SWT 158/159? I'd guess not. The seats are brilliant, lovely and comfy, nice and sturdy, far better than the current ones.
I agree that the legroom in the 170s is rediculous (I'm 5'10"), though I did manage to get a nice sleep last time I went on a 159, even if it was just Dawlish - Exeter St Davids and there was a bitchy cockney woman and a drunk bloke getting on the whole train's nervesThey are sturdy and well-padded, but if you're over 5'10", you'd better hope it's quiet and you get a table to yourself - the legroom is unbearable.
I hope the EMT 158 refurb does not go down the same route as the AXC 170 one. The seat pitch now is so small, I (at 6'1") cannot physically fit in a single airline seat.
In answer to the OP, it would boil down to the following:
185s
and for the busiest services:
A 2+5 HST, considering of Standard Class coaches only, including the buffet car.