• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

EMR Class 360's

Mollman

Established Member
Joined
21 Sep 2016
Messages
1,264
Right lets make this simple. The 360s are going to Eastleigh for the work mentioned below, this is work that will be scheduled as part of the maintenance by Siemens. It will have taken a long time for the first unit to be done because it always does as the team familiarise themselves etc.
It has been said up thread that
a) there is more than repaints being done; Siemens are doing reliability mods
b) bodywork overhaul/repaint is a required maintenance task and has to be done. It also often includes door equipment overhaul at the same time.

Is this all a waste of time in your ranting world?
Internal Refurbishment is being contracted by EMR and seems to be scheduled for later than originally hoped, as far as I am aware we are not sure yet who has been award the work.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

MML

Member
Joined
25 Oct 2015
Messages
588
It has been said up thread that
a) there is more than repaints being done; Siemens are doing reliability mods
b) bodywork overhaul/repaint is a required maintenance task and has to be done. It also often includes door equipment overhaul at the same time.

Is this all a waste of time in your ranting world?
You appear to be confusing my complaint about repeated shortformed units and the work being undertaken at Eastleigh. With 2 units at Eastleigh and a requirement for 12 in service to provide 8 car services, that only requires 66% of total units. So the work at Eastleigh doesn't excuse the short forms. 33% or 7 of the fleet is neither at Eastleigh nor in service.
 

londonteacher

Member
Joined
10 Aug 2018
Messages
682
You appear to be confusing my complaint about repeated shortformed units and the work being undertaken at Eastleigh. With 2 units at Eastleigh and a requirement for 12 in service to provide 8 car services, that only requires 66% of total units. So the work at Eastleigh doesn't excuse the short forms. 33% or 7 of the fleet is neither at Eastleigh nor in service.
Maybe something is happening behind the scenes though with owners of 360 which means they are not all currently available. That kind of information might not be in the public domain?
 

MML

Member
Joined
25 Oct 2015
Messages
588
I did wonder about that. If EMR are operating under government funded emergency measures some bright spark at the DfT might have come up with an amendment to the lease whereby you only pay for using a reduced fleet due to downturn in passengers.
Likely only if the same units are in long term storage, although we don't know whether storage is for mechanical, dilapidation or financial reasons.

So far 2 days of short forms.
Monday was an overcrowded 4-car unit, but at least it turned up. The next service was cancelled due to a fault with the train.
Today, another 4-car full and standing.
It isn't a pleasant experience, particularly in COVID times.
Has 121 ventured out since its return from the paint shop?
And to think we were promised refurbished 12-car units.

So far 2 days of short forms.
Monday was an overcrowded 4-car unit, but at least it turned up. The next service was cancelled due to a fault with the train.
Today, another 4-car full and standing.
It isn't a pleasant experience, particularly in COVID times.
Has 121 ventured out since its return from the paint shop?
And to think we were promised refurbished 12-car units.
 
Last edited:

DG85

Member
Joined
5 Jul 2010
Messages
33
I did wonder about that. If EMR are operating under government funded emergency measures some bright spark at the DfT might have come up with an amendment to the lease whereby you only pay for using a reduced fleet due to downturn in passengers.
Likely only if the same units are in long term storage, although we don't know whether storage is for mechanical, dilapidation or financial reasons.

So far 2 days of short forms.
Monday was an overcrowded 4-car unit, but at least it turned up. The next service was cancelled due to a fault with the train.
Today, another 4-car full and standing.
It isn't a pleasant experience, particularly in COVID times.
Has 121 ventured out since its return from the paint shop?
And to think we were promised refurbished 12-car units.

So far 2 days of short forms.
Monday was an overcrowded 4-car unit, but at least it turned up. The next service was cancelled due to a fault with the train.
Today, another 4-car full and standing.
It isn't a pleasant experience, particularly in COVID times.
Has 121 ventured out since its return from the paint shop?
And to think we were promised refurbished 12-car units.
4 cars make a regular appearance;
17:17 from St Pancras was FULL and standing yesterday.
17:47 was 4 car on Monday FULL and standing. In these circumstances especially at peaks times they should be doing more to provide the capacity where it’s needed. In general since the arrival of the 360s it seems to be nothing but consistently bad planning
 

MML

Member
Joined
25 Oct 2015
Messages
588
1617 from St Pancras is a 4-car full and standing again today.
Absolutely unacceptable, especially as they are trying to fulfill the requirement of a non-stop express service to Luton Airport.
We have perfectly decent Class 365 units going to the scrap heap and the fleet of 21 Class 360s can't even provide 12 serviceable units on reliable daily schedule. Awful service.
 

F Great Eastern

Established Member
Joined
2 Apr 2009
Messages
3,595
Location
East Anglia
1617 from St Pancras is a 4-car full and standing again today.
Absolutely unacceptable, especially as they are trying to fulfill the requirement of a non-stop express service to Luton Airport.
We have perfectly decent Class 365 units going to the scrap heap and the fleet of 21 Class 360s can't even provide 12 serviceable units on reliable daily schedule. Awful service.

This is a bed that Abellio have made and are now laying in it. Considering what the trains did achieve before they were let go in their last year at Greater Anglia (under Abellio), this is entirely a problem caused by Abellio, rather than an issue with the previously ultra reliable trains.
 

Hairy Bear

Member
Joined
13 Feb 2011
Messages
346
Location
Derbyshire
This is a bed that Abellio have made and are now laying in it. Considering what the trains did achieve before they were let go in their last year at Greater Anglia (under Abellio), this is entirely a problem caused by Abellio, rather than an issue with the previously ultra reliable trains.
Actually when they were first brought over to allow us, each one had at least a door fault ,traction faults , earth faults,and multiple a/c faults.
Some are still running around with some of these faults. There not as reliable as you think.
Oh here were go again ...a pair with total loss of of traction this morning.
 

Goldfish62

Established Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
10,253
Internal Refurbishment is being contracted by EMR and seems to be scheduled for later than originally hoped, as far as I am aware we are not sure yet who has been award the work.
According to Modern Railways the first refurbished unit is due to emerge in Q3 22/23, ie around a year from now.
 
Last edited:

Wolfie

Established Member
Joined
17 Aug 2010
Messages
6,243
According to Modern Railways the first refurbished unit is due to emerge in Q3 21/22, ie around a year from now.
If your quote is accurate with respect to 21/22, and it doesn't actually say 22/23, the first refurbished unit should actually be emerging around now. 21/22 runs 1 Apr 21-31 Mar 22 so Q3 would be Oct-Dec 21.
 

Hairy Bear

Member
Joined
13 Feb 2011
Messages
346
Location
Derbyshire
Not a good day for the fleet.3 diagrams are only 4: cars.
Still 121 is out in service, not had chance to see what's been done.
 
Last edited:

MML

Member
Joined
25 Oct 2015
Messages
588
I just cannot believe Siemens has not been contracted to perform heavy maintenance and improved line maintenance support at the stabling points to avoid these repeated issues.
EMR have 21 units. The serviceability is appalling.
 

43055

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2018
Messages
2,943
I just cannot believe Siemens has not been contracted to perform heavy maintenance and improved line maintenance support at the stabling points to avoid these repeated issues.
EMR have 21 units. The serviceability is appalling.
Surely Siemens are involved as they run Bedford Depot? It doesn't help that there is only 1 path Monday to Saturday out of Bedford Caudwell to swap the units over so assuming they come in/out as a 8 car that would be 12 units a week.

Still at least there is still a normal half hourly service unlike the regional side.
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
15,462
Surely Siemens are involved as they run Bedford Depot? It doesn't help that there is only 1 path Monday to Saturday out of Bedford Caudwell to swap the units over so assuming they come in/out as a 8 car that would be 12 units a week.

Still at least there is still a normal half hourly service unlike the regional side.
Heavy work is done at Northampton, which is a Siemens depot, but they see units even less frequently. There’s a point here about declining reliability that once it starts to drop, it takes a lot of time and effort to get it back.
 

Hairy Bear

Member
Joined
13 Feb 2011
Messages
346
Location
Derbyshire
No they only service 10 units a week. They only attend Kett/ C,wood as required.
As I have previously posted, if a faults found on prep ,then the sets not used.
 

MML

Member
Joined
25 Oct 2015
Messages
588
How often are units sent to Northampton for maintenance? They went there for the work to increase maximum speed mods but not sure whether a loco drag is a regular weekly occurrence.
Does anyone have a list of where the fleet are located and which are active?
There are no more than 2 units at Cricklewood. Less than 12 in service, only 9 today. 2 at Eastleigh.
Where are all the rest?
Makes you wonder whether a couple of fitters at Kettering and Cricklewood could resolve minor issues which don't require more in depth maintenance action.
 

Goldfish62

Established Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
10,253
If your quote is accurate with respect to 21/22, and it doesn't actually say 22/23, the first refurbished unit should actually be emerging around now. 21/22 runs 1 Apr 21-31 Mar 22 so Q3 would be Oct-Dec 21.
No need to be like that! I did of course mean 22/23.
 

F Great Eastern

Established Member
Joined
2 Apr 2009
Messages
3,595
Location
East Anglia
Actually when they were first brought over to allow us, each one had at least a door fault ,traction faults , earth faults,and multiple a/c faults.
Some are still running around with some of these faults. There not as reliable as you think.
Oh here were go again ...a pair with total loss of of traction this morning.
Well in the year before last they were the most reliable units in their sector and won the golden spanner for exactly that and have been there or thereabouts for most of their lives.

I know that they had a fair few issues when EMR got hold of them, but my comment about Abellio was referencing that much of these issues dates back to the last year they were in service for Greater Anglia, also under Abellio, where their reliability saw a massive fall because they were unloved in their last 12 months etc. The rot set in before they even set foot anywhere near EMR land.
 

Sleepy

Established Member
Joined
15 Feb 2009
Messages
1,558
Location
East Anglia
Well reading this thread with the shambles of a fictional timetable on the regional side plus the various ongoing industrial disputes with no urgency to resolve it seems like they're lurching from one crisis to the next !
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
17,895
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
No they only service 10 units a week. They only attend Kett/ C,wood as required.
As I have previously posted, if a faults found on prep ,then the sets not used.

It does seem that the issues run deeper than just the 360s being less reliable than hoped for.

Is the setup where pretty much all the units are outstabled every night sufficiently robust? It would appear not.
 

Shunter_69

Member
Joined
10 Dec 2014
Messages
478
Well in the year before last they were the most reliable units in their sector and won the golden spanner for exactly that and have been there or thereabouts for most of their lives.

I know that they had a fair few issues when EMR got hold of them, but my comment about Abellio was referencing that much of these issues dates back to the last year they were in service for Greater Anglia, also under Abellio, where their reliability saw a massive fall because they were unloved in their last 12 months etc. The rot set in before they even set foot anywhere near EMR land.
They were maintained by dedicated Siemens fitters at Ilford rather than GA fitters.
 

Martin222002

Member
Joined
6 Nov 2011
Messages
257
Location
Chesterfield, Derbyshire
Well, after seeing this tweet the other day I can't help but think I smell the DfT / Treasury being unwilling to fund reliability improvements to get the 360s working reliably as they once did.

One senior engineer told @RailBusinessUK that £500 of rolling stock repairs had been delayed by multiple requests for justification from government officials, delaying the restoration of capacity and almost doubling the cost.
https://twitter.com/RailBusinessUK/status/1455866367505321986

This however doesn't get EMR and Abellio off the hook completely though, as it's very clear that not enough thought was put into how the 360s were going to be operated and maintained, as well as many other issues at EMR.

I also wouldn't be surprised if the delays to the refurbishment of the 360s were also connected to DfT mico-management, and not approving the work to start on even procuring it until obviously recently.
 

F Great Eastern

Established Member
Joined
2 Apr 2009
Messages
3,595
Location
East Anglia
They were maintained by dedicated Siemens fitters at Ilford rather than GA fitters.

The contract with Siemens was a 'full service' contract when they were delivered, but it wasn't at the end, it was downgraded to a less comprehensive 'maintenance' contract.

As far as I'm aware, all the other Desiro fleets remain on either TSSSA or Full service contracts. See attached Siemens document from a few years ago in terms of what was under what.

It's worth noting that the 2 year contract in question would have ended in about 2019, perhaps they extended it or cut it back further, since it's well known that where Siemens used to service the 360s is now where Bombardier site is.
 

Attachments

  • Siemens Rail System Brochure.pdf
    1.1 MB · Views: 31
Last edited:

DannyMich2018

Member
Joined
19 Dec 2018
Messages
761
At Kettering now. 11.16 to Corby is 360117 and 110 on 11.19 to London SP. Whether the other 4 diagrams are just 4 cars I'm not sure. The 11.16 Corby deposited a lot of people at Kettering who changed to 11.22 Nottingham service which is standing room only again.
 

RailWonderer

Established Member
Joined
25 Jul 2018
Messages
1,658
Location
All around the network
Well, after seeing this tweet the other day I can't help but think I smell the DfT / Treasury being unwilling to fund reliability improvements to get the 360s working reliably as they once did.


https://twitter.com/RailBusinessUK/status/1455866367505321986

This however doesn't get EMR and Abellio off the hook completely though, as it's very clear that not enough thought was put into how the 360s were going to be operated and maintained, as well as many other issues at EMR.

I also wouldn't be surprised if the delays to the refurbishment of the 360s were also connected to DfT mico-management, and not approving the work to start on even procuring it until obviously recently.
I don't believe the comprehensive maintenance the 360s recieved from Siemens covered corrosion repair - remember the 350/1s needed it before undergoing refurbishment and I suspect the slightly older 360s do as well, hence lower availability added to the lack of stabling space in a depot. They are second fiddle to the 700s at Bedford and to the 350s at Northampton.
I wouldn't imagine convincing the DafT would be difficult if the alternative would be driver training costs involved in using alternative rolling stock, or reverting to using 222 DMUs and returning the service to hourly and saying we will just pollute more if you don't help us.
If all fails they could just introduce 365s on this route, it's not as if the 110mph on the 360s is being used, and the driver training would not take too long but the costs would balloon.
 

westcoaster

Established Member
Joined
4 Dec 2006
Messages
4,251
Location
DTOS A or B
I don't believe the comprehensive maintenance the 360s recieved from Siemens covered corrosion repair - remember the 350/1s needed it before undergoing refurbishment and I suspect the slightly older 360s do as well, hence lower availability added to the lack of stabling space in a depot. They are second fiddle to the 700s at Bedford and to the 350s at Northampton.
I wouldn't imagine convincing the DafT would be difficult if the alternative would be driver training costs involved in using alternative rolling stock, or reverting to using 222 DMUs and returning the service to hourly and saying we will just pollute more if you don't help us.
If all fails they could just introduce 365s on this route, it's not as if the 110mph on the 360s is being used, and the driver training would not take too long but the costs would balloon.
They are not second fiddle to the 700's at Bedford. TL only stable and service (tanking, cleaning) at cauldwell, that's it.

I counted 6 360's at Cricklewood yesterday afternoon all laid up.

No they only service 10 units a week. They only attend Kett/ C,wood as required.
As I have previously posted, if a faults found on prep ,then the sets not used.
Which is where they need a technician based on site to help.

One problem is once failed on prep there is only 1 path to Cauldewell, only Kettering drivers take units onto the depot.

No drivers available on site to shunt trains around Cauldewell (have to come from Kettering if available).

No they only service 10 units a week. They only attend Kett/ C,wood as required.
As I have previously posted, if a faults found on prep ,then the sets not used.
Which is where they need a technician based on site to help.

One problem is once failed on prep there is only 1 path to Cauldewell, only Kettering drivers take units onto the depot.

No drivers available on site to shunt trains around (have to come from Kettering if available).
 
Last edited:

Pippy1505

Member
Joined
4 Nov 2010
Messages
101
Fleet of 21 usually 8 stopped on maintenance (5 at Cauldwell, 1 at Northampton, 2 at Eastleigh) leaves 13 for 12 diagrams not much room to allow for failures
 

Top