• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

The Windsor Link Railway

Status
Not open for further replies.

gwr4090

Member
Joined
9 Nov 2011
Messages
144
According to the BBC, Network Rail has given "approval" to the proposed privately funded Windsor Link Railway which has aspirations to link the Southern and Western lines to Windsor by means of a tunnel under the Thames. This would allow a Staines-Slough service, presumably by extension of the Waterloo-Windsor services.

Further details here:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-berkshire-22983453
http://windsorlink.co.uk/
http://www.sloughobserver.co.uk/new...90502-boost-for-windsor-link-railway-project/

David
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Monty

Established Member
Joined
12 Jun 2012
Messages
2,352
I'll believe it when I see it, I seriously cannot see them accomplishing this project without destroying many historical buildings in Windsor's town centre.

I note the management team appear to have no experience in railways (engineering or operational) whatsoever, well according to their website anyway.
 

CarltonA

Member
Joined
22 Apr 2012
Messages
710
Location
Thames Valley
The tunnel is not to go under the Thames but under the town of Windsor south of the river. This also implies that the third rail system could be extended to Slough or wires to run to Staines.
 

snowball

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
7,741
Location
Leeds
There's already a railway known as the Windsor Link, opened in about 1989 - in Salford!
 

johnnychips

Established Member
Joined
19 Nov 2011
Messages
3,679
Location
Sheffield
The tunnel is not to go under the Thames but under the town of Windsor south of the river. This also implies that the third rail system could be extended to Slough or wires to run to Staines.

You're right, looking at the map on the link from the OP. That doesn't give much space for the tunnel under Windsor to dive down and come up again. More questions than answers.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,437
NR cannot 'approve' such a thing. I guess they are saying it is feasible to build it, but without any funding and without a TWA Order (or current equivalent) to authorise it, I think NR's opinion really means little.

Does anyone see DfT jumping on this bandwagon?
 

jopsuk

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2008
Messages
12,773
It looks like NR have basically said "Yeah, as long as it doesn't cost us anything, we're OK with that".

I'm intrigued by their idea for connecting to Heathrow- is that gradient from the station in the bowels of T5 to a bridge over the motorway feasible? Wires to Staines would seem to be the sensible solution for power.
 

Muzer

Established Member
Joined
3 Feb 2012
Messages
2,773
The part about this that I don't like is the bringing out of use of Windsor & Eton Central. Though I suppose compared to what it once was, it's near enough out of use already ;)
 

tbtc

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Dec 2008
Messages
17,882
Location
Reston City Centre
On one level it looks like an interesting logistical problem - trying to find a solution that deals with the current lack of links (e.g. Reading to Windsor/ Heathrow, Slough to Heathrow/ Staines).

I don't know the area well enough to comment on whether it'd be easy enough to build this new link between the two lines in Windsor. What does interest me is the idea of private firms/ organisation building new links (or upgrading bits of existing line, adding chords etc)... on paper it sounds good (e.g. Chiltern's Evergreen), but I don't know how realistic this would be.
 

Pumbaa

Established Member
Joined
19 Feb 2008
Messages
4,983
As it wants to build it 'cut and cover' style, I give it approximately 0% chance happening in its current form. I know 'retro' is all the rage these days, but returning to Victorian construction methods? Not a chance.
 

quantinghome

Established Member
Joined
1 Jun 2013
Messages
2,265
As it wants to build it 'cut and cover' style, I give it approximately 0% chance happening in its current form. I know 'retro' is all the rage these days, but returning to Victorian construction methods? Not a chance.

Cut and cover is still alive and well. For shallow tunnels it's the most economic method. It's a well-used technique all over the world. Not that it will make particular this scheme any more likely to happen though.
 

route:oxford

Established Member
Joined
1 Nov 2008
Messages
4,949
If the majority of the railway through Windsor goes underground...

How much ground level land (at Windsor prices) becomes available for developers?
 

Bedpan

Established Member
Joined
4 Feb 2010
Messages
1,287
Location
Harpenden
Cut and cover is still alive and well. For shallow tunnels it's the most economic method. It's a well-used technique all over the world. Not that it will make particular this scheme any more likely to happen though.

The 1km or so long Hatfield Road tunnel (A1(M)) built about 25 - 30 years ago is cut and cover.
 

jopsuk

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2008
Messages
12,773
Cut and cover is still alive and well. For shallow tunnels it's the most economic method. It's a well-used technique all over the world. Not that it will make particular this scheme any more likely to happen though.

Cut and cover down busy town streets though...
 

Ivo

Established Member
Joined
8 Jan 2010
Messages
7,307
Location
Bath (or Southend)
Is Windsor flat enough for cut-and-cover, even by the river? Or are we looking at some silly 20m-deep trenches being built just a couple of minutes' walk from the castle? :|
 

Monty

Established Member
Joined
12 Jun 2012
Messages
2,352
The gradient aside, cut and cover would surely require the demolishing of many historic buildings in Thames Avenue, Thames Street and the High street. All that for the sake of shaving off 10 minutes (though admittedly I reckon it would be closer to 25 minutes) would be an act of cultural vandalism.

If also like to know how they intend to make money from this ill conceived plan, I can hardly see them force the TOCs to use the line then make them pay a track access charge. It's like telling someone they have to cross their bridge, but insist you pay the toll too. :roll:
 
Last edited:

Rational Plan

Member
Joined
3 Aug 2011
Messages
235
Not only that, but think of the change in Levels. The new combined station would either be at the existing Riverside station or next to the riverside park. The problem is the centre of the town and the main tourist attraction (the Castle) is at the top of the Hill, where the current station is nicely placed in the middle of shopping centre and a level walk to the Castle (and Windsor swarms with Tourists all year round).

There is no way the anyone in Town let a shallow rail tunnel bulldoze through the riverside, cutting off Eton for three or four years.

The only way it would happen is with a deep bore tunnel, so it avoided demolition though the town and cutting a new embankments and tunnels across the Thameside flood plain.

This would have to be a government project, TOC's aren't really interested in providing slow orbital links, when all their lines to London are choked with traffic, with people paying much higher fares.

If we were looking at a proper outer London orbital line, then it would centre on Heathrow, providing links to all the main lines.
 

monsento

Guest
Joined
14 Nov 2012
Messages
93
ive been watching the windsor rail link developments with keen interest now they have approval and funding they are getting a plan together on how to build the thing.

where will ten cars go at Slough?
 

bluenoxid

Established Member
Joined
9 Feb 2008
Messages
2,466
ive been watching the windsor rail link developments with keen interest now they have approval and funding they are getting a plan together on how to build the thing.

where will ten cars go at Slough?


I would not say that they have funding that will get them through GRIP and the only approval I am aware of is inclusion on the local plan. However, if you can confirm otherwise, I would be interested. WRATH is a separate project.
 

monsento

Guest
Joined
14 Nov 2012
Messages
93
I would not say that they have funding that will get them through GRIP and the only approval I am aware of is inclusion on the local plan. However, if you can confirm otherwise, I would be interested. WRATH is a separate project.

see the main site it is funded is the more the permission/planning then building, loads of red tape!
 
Last edited:

bluenoxid

Established Member
Joined
9 Feb 2008
Messages
2,466
They need £100m and they are not celebrating that. They may claim a robust business case but that is very different to cash in the hand. They have got a major amount of work to do before the first sod is cut on site
 
Last edited:

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
39,011
Location
Yorks
Is there really a market of people wanting to get from one side of Windsor to the other? Seems like a lot of money for an uncharted benefit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top