• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

General Election 2015 - Thoughts/Predictions/Results

How are you voting in the General Election

  • Conservative

    Votes: 25 18.0%
  • Green Party

    Votes: 15 10.8%
  • Labour

    Votes: 45 32.4%
  • Liberal Democrats

    Votes: 16 11.5%
  • Plaid Cymru

    Votes: 3 2.2%
  • Scottish National Party

    Votes: 9 6.5%
  • UK Independence Party

    Votes: 13 9.4%
  • Other: Right Leaning Party

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other: Left Leaning Party

    Votes: 1 0.7%
  • Other: Centrist Party

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other: Other

    Votes: 2 1.4%
  • Not Voting

    Votes: 7 5.0%
  • Spoiling Ballot

    Votes: 3 2.2%

  • Total voters
    139
Status
Not open for further replies.

Tetchytyke

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Sep 2013
Messages
13,305
Location
Isle of Man
The problem is rushed resignations lead to rushed elections for a replacement. It is rare that a party chooses well in that situation, even if the right person to fix the mess is the right person to take the party forward.

You saw that with the Conservatives. Major, Hague and Duncan-Smith all stood down in a rush and the party rushed their choice of replacement. Howard didn't, he stayed for a good six months after the election, and the party were able to make a better choice of leader as a result.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

cb a1

Member
Joined
9 Mar 2015
Messages
352
I do rather think that the "we lost so I resign" thing is a bit overdone. I grant you the long-term position is untenable, but would it really be so bad to say "I tender my resignation, but will stay on until such time as a new leader can be duly elected"?
That's what happened after the Independence Referendum. Alex Salmond said that he would resign after a new leader was chosen at the Party Conference two months later.
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
32,423
Location
A semi-rural part of north-west England
You saw that with the Conservatives. Major, Hague and Duncan-Smith all stood down in a rush and the party rushed their choice of replacement. Howard didn't, he stayed for a good six months after the election, and the party were able to make a better choice of leader as a result.

Well then, another subject upon which we share total agreement, for a refreshing change..:D
 

me123

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2007
Messages
8,510
The Lib Dems are less toxic than the SNP given Labour doesn't support an Independent Scotland and the SNP were expected to ask for another Independence vote if they got in to government.

Really? The Lib Dems are associated with austerity and the faults of the previous government. By comparison, the SNP align more closely with Labour, and lack the stigma of the coalition. That said, I certainly do not think a formal coalition would have been possible or even desirable. It would have been a Labour government, as I suspect any SNP cabinet position would have been widely resented in England (except, perhaps, Scottish secretary).

As has been said many times before, the SNP do not want another referendum at the moment - this keeps coming up, and I so no reason to believe that there will be another referendum in the next five years. I don't they'd have demanded it, it would not have been an issue.
 

Noddy

Member
Joined
11 Oct 2014
Messages
1,009
Location
UK
The Lib Dems are less toxic than the SNP given Labour doesn't support an Independent Scotland and the SNP were expected to ask for another Independence vote if they got in to government.

Really? The Lib Dems are associated with austerity and the faults of the previous government.

I think Labour's (and more widely the left's) persecution of the Lib Dems in government has directly led to the election of this Conservative government. Yes, the Lib Dems made a some horrendous mistakes, but if Labour had gone after their true enemies, they might have actually pulled off an election win or a coalition. Instead the continual bashing of the Lib Dems distracted (at least in England and Wales) from what the Tories were planning.
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
32,423
Location
A semi-rural part of north-west England
I think Labour's (and more widely the left's) persecution of the Lib Dems in government has directly led to the election of this Conservative government. Yes, the Lib Dems made a some horrendous mistakes, but if Labour had gone after their true enemies, they might have actually pulled off an election win or a coalition. Instead the continual bashing of the Lib Dems distracted (at least in England and Wales) from what the Tories were planning.

That does not say much for the strategy of those in the Labour Party who decided upon that particular course of action, does it...:roll:
 

St Rollox

Member
Joined
2 Jun 2013
Messages
650
The strangest one of all regarding leaders resigning or not must be the Scottish Tory leader, Ruth Davidson.
Scottish Tories had one seat which they held on to.
So far so good until it's pointed out the Scottish Tories had their lowest percentage vote since 1865.
 

Butts

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Jan 2011
Messages
11,324
Location
Stirlingshire
The strangest one of all regarding leaders resigning or not must be the Scottish Tory leader, Ruth Davidson.
Scottish Tories had one seat which they held on to.
So far so good until it's pointed out the Scottish Tories had their lowest percentage vote since 1865.

I suspect you are being a little mischievous with those comments, I'm sure you are well aware the drop in the Tory Vote was largely as a result of the "SNP Surge".

Not only did they hold Mundell's seat they came very close to gaining Michael Moores neighbouring seat in Selkirk just being defeated by a few hundred votes.

This just goes to demonstrate "Border Country" (both sides) is natural Tory territory.

It is generally accepted by most commentators that Ruth fought an honourable and decent campaign.
 

Tetchytyke

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Sep 2013
Messages
13,305
Location
Isle of Man
I've always aligned with the LibDems (SDP wing, natch), and I am certain that history will be a lot kinder to them than the 2015 electorate were.

I think the SNP fear played a part in the LDs being wiped out in their west country heartland. I hope they bounce back quickly there, but I fear not.

I'm still not convinced by Tim Farron- his voting on gay marriage is an issue for me- but he has charisma by the bucketload and is adored in his constituency across the board. The LDs probably need that for now to rebuild.
 

St Rollox

Member
Joined
2 Jun 2013
Messages
650
I suspect you are being a little mischievous with those comments, I'm sure you are well aware the drop in the Tory Vote was largely as a result of the "SNP Surge".

Not only did they hold Mundell's seat they came very close to gaining Michael Moores neighbouring seat in Selkirk just being defeated by a few hundred votes.

This just goes to demonstrate "Border Country" (both sides) is natural Tory territory.

It is generally accepted by most commentators that Ruth fought an honourable and decent campaign.

Maybe long term the best hope for left or right unionists in Scotland is some sort of unionist coalition.
As i predicted on here last September the unionist vote would split three ways.
 

me123

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2007
Messages
8,510
The strangest one of all regarding leaders resigning or not must be the Scottish Tory leader, Ruth Davidson.
Scottish Tories had one seat which they held on to.
So far so good until it's pointed out the Scottish Tories had their lowest percentage vote since 1865.

Huh? She's done very well, holding on to her single seat in the face of adversity being a highly commendable for the Tories (very likely to have been eradicated altogether), she fought a good campaign that she was never going to win, and is actually one of the few politicians on the opposition side of Holyrood that is competent.

I'd actually be quite tempted to vote for her (!) on the grounds that she offers the SNP the most credible opposition and actually holds them to account.
 
Last edited:

Clip

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2010
Messages
10,822
ha ha didn't think so. Though I seem to wonder that if Labour had won then everyone would be hounding that horrid Hopkins woman to leave as she said she would.


Phil Collins - :D
 

Groningen

Established Member
Joined
14 Jan 2015
Messages
2,866
So apparently a letter has been sent to a Mr. McLean; saying that he was explend for voting SNP as a Labour member.

enhanced-3162-1432999933-4.jpg
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
27,686
Location
Redcar
Well if them's the rules then I don't see much wrong with that (also assuming that the person the letter was sent was actually silly enough to publicly talk about what they were doing). Though what is, in effect, a five year ban seems a bit harsh!
 

St Rollox

Member
Joined
2 Jun 2013
Messages
650
Huh? She's done very well, holding on to her single seat in the face of adversity being a highly commendable for the Tories (very likely to have been eradicated altogether), she fought a good campaign that she was never going to win, and is actually one of the few politicians on the opposition side of Holyrood that is competent.

I'd actually be quite tempted to vote for her (!) on the grounds that she offers the SNP the most credible opposition and actually holds them to account.

Ruth Davidson's party did well to hold on to their one seat.
They also saw the Tory vote go up.
And then you look a bit further and find the party had its poorest percentage vote in 150 years.
Possibly a helping of independence might aid the Scottish Tories.
Just saying No to constitutional change doesn't help them.
First it was devolution itself, then it was the Calman commission, now it's the Smith commission, next it will be something else.
At it stands the Tories in Scotland just help to split the unionist vote.
 

dcsprior

Member
Joined
28 Aug 2012
Messages
795
Location
Edinburgh (Fri-Mon) & London (Tue-Thu)
Just saying No to constitutional change doesn't help them.
First it was devolution itself, then it was the Calman commission, now it's the Smith commission, next it will be something else.
At it stands the Tories in Scotland just help to split the unionist vote.
I'm not so sure about that - if I was opposed to any step in the direction of independence (I'm not), and if that were the most important issue to me (it's not), then I'd vote Conservative.

Also, the Scottish Tories' rhetoric seems to be to the left of their party as a whole - perhaps to avoid putting off those who vote for them principally for the above reason?

Although I don't support her party, I can't bring myself to dislike Ruth Davidson.
 

Manchester77

Established Member
Joined
4 Jun 2012
Messages
2,628
Location
Manchester
Although I don't support her party, I can't bring myself to dislike Ruth Davidson.

I have found this, she's also a far better politician than Kezia is. It's quite welcoming at FMQs when you had weeks of Kezia's mindless and ridiculous SNP BAD questions to Nicola that Ruth actually asked actual questions in relation to actual issues.
 

St Rollox

Member
Joined
2 Jun 2013
Messages
650
Could be wrong but i'm sure the last time the Scottish Tories won a Westminster bye election was Glasgow Pollok in 1967.
48 years and counting.
The Tory political problem is there just isn't enough space for them.
Even the one Tory MP only held on with the help of Labour voters and vice versa for Labour in Edinburgh South.
Ruth Davidson will hold the line for another couple of years until Murdo Fraser takes over.
 

overthewater

Established Member
Joined
16 Apr 2012
Messages
8,173
Also just to say the Tories share of the vote in Scotland is the lowest its been in a UK election for years, even with the increase turnout.

If Murdo Fraser does take over, I wonder what the new party will be called?
 

Manchester77

Established Member
Joined
4 Jun 2012
Messages
2,628
Location
Manchester
I doubt so, they're predicted to gain an MSP in Holyrood next year and Ruth is by far one of the best MSPs in the chamber currently.
 

overthewater

Established Member
Joined
16 Apr 2012
Messages
8,173
I doubt so, they're predicted to gain an MSP in Holyrood next year and Ruth is by far one of the best MSPs in the chamber currently.

Can you point to where this is being claimed? I can't see how on earth Ruth and her party will gain an extra MSP.
 

radamfi

Established Member
Joined
29 Oct 2009
Messages
9,267
Can you point to where this is being claimed? I can't see how on earth Ruth and her party will gain an extra MSP.

There are 129 MSPs and we are only talking about an increase from 15 to 16, that is from 11.6% of seats to 12.4%. Nothing significant.
 

St Rollox

Member
Joined
2 Jun 2013
Messages
650
Also just to say the Tories share of the vote in Scotland is the lowest its been in a UK election for years, even with the increase turnout.

If Murdo Fraser does take over, I wonder what the new party will be called?

Don't know about the name but Murdo Fraser is pretty open about his support for Federalism with full tax raising powers.
Problem is, most Tory voters would run a mile.
His idea isn't new, a breakaway from the Scottish Tories thought up the idea in the 1920s, they wanted dominion status for Scotland.
See Cathcart Unionists and the Scottish Party.
They ended up helping to start the SNP in 1934.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
I doubt so, they're predicted to gain an MSP in Holyrood next year and Ruth is by far one of the best MSPs in the chamber currently.

The press was talking about the Scottish Tories picking up 4 or more Westminster seats about about 16 months.
LinDems were to collapse, which they did.
Nobody saw the post referendum rise of the SNP coming.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top