wimbledonpete
Member
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2011
- Messages
- 235
Hi
One of those idle moments looking out of the window at Vauxhall got me thinking (always dangerous). Right now, platforms 7/8 are the narrowest island of the four, yet see very high passenger volumes. Platforms 5/6 are wider, yet are on the fast lines so don't see any trains stopping except during disruption and engineering work.
My idle speculation was whether or not 5/6 could be demolished, the down fast and up slow slewed over and 7/8 made wider. This would give wider stairways, possibly including escalators, and a wider platform for circulation.
Obviously this would then mean that Vauxhall couldn't be served if the slow lines were blocked, but on balance I wonder if that's a price worth paying for more space for the vast majority of the time? Also depends if there's the space down below to take a fast flow of passengers, I guess. And the construction would involve a lot of disruption.
Stupidest idea in the world or worth considering?
One of those idle moments looking out of the window at Vauxhall got me thinking (always dangerous). Right now, platforms 7/8 are the narrowest island of the four, yet see very high passenger volumes. Platforms 5/6 are wider, yet are on the fast lines so don't see any trains stopping except during disruption and engineering work.
My idle speculation was whether or not 5/6 could be demolished, the down fast and up slow slewed over and 7/8 made wider. This would give wider stairways, possibly including escalators, and a wider platform for circulation.
Obviously this would then mean that Vauxhall couldn't be served if the slow lines were blocked, but on balance I wonder if that's a price worth paying for more space for the vast majority of the time? Also depends if there's the space down below to take a fast flow of passengers, I guess. And the construction would involve a lot of disruption.
Stupidest idea in the world or worth considering?