I can't see France or any other EU state being that interested as long as Cameron insists that the UK doesn't take a quota of the refugees that are going into the nearest states to Northern Africa, namely Italy, Greece and Spain.
It is an inconvenience for France, but really it's only a British problem. Britain's separatist attitudes reduce any sympathy that they might get in Europe. If we are taken out of the EU, it will get worse.
I tend to agree, most Western European nations (including France) know the problem well and have to spend their money and resources on the migrants that they have on their territory - at least the ones that claim asylum there (in France that is 60,000 or so in 2014). Processing that number costs money and resources in every nation. Reducing the number heading to other countries is not on the agenda. Calais could be secured at a cost, but these people will not go away. If they are undocumented, untraceable and do not want to stay in France, they will risk everything to reach the UK.
No, asylum should not work on quotas etc but it is difficult to see a fair way forward. When the first safe country as a Syrian refugee you reach is Greece or Italy, it depends on whether you think those countries can and should solely deal with the problem. Then if you enact a quota with transport to other nations, you may encourage more illegitmate cases. Catch 22.
Last edited: