• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Jeremy Corbyn's Traingate

Status
Not open for further replies.

WelshL77

New Member
Joined
23 Aug 2016
Messages
1
Hi train people :)

Joined here to try to find something out ref this Corbyn thing.

I'm curious about the photos released and one in particular has two photos together, apparently both from 2 different carriages on the same journey but both have the cctv camera named as 'camera 3'. Would a train name different cameras with the same name? Or is it right and the camera name is just which number camera on that carriage? It did list the carriage number on both photos too.

Not knowing even the smallest thing about this kind of stuff I'm clueless tbh.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Elecman

Established Member
Joined
31 Dec 2013
Messages
2,910
Location
Lancashire
I've just checked the train location according to the stamp on the images and they are around/ after New Southgate so train had definatly left KX
 

bb21

Emeritus Moderator
Joined
4 Feb 2010
Messages
24,151
Hi train people :)

Joined here to try to find something out ref this Corbyn thing.

I'm curious about the photos released and one in particular has two photos together, apparently both from 2 different carriages on the same journey but both have the cctv camera named as 'camera 3'. Would a train name different cameras with the same name? Or is it right and the camera name is just which number camera on that carriage? It did list the carriage number on both photos too.

Not knowing even the smallest thing about this kind of stuff I'm clueless tbh.

Looks like Camera 3's in different carriages to me, one is 12316 and the other 10321.
 

Robertj21a

On Moderation
Joined
22 Sep 2013
Messages
7,526
Stitched up by praising their helpful staff? They could have replied publicly and said our records show there were 100 empty seats in Coach F, but they didn't.

Just Corbyn being cynical, trying to appear in touch with the outside world. Those cctv images were just what is needed to get the truth out when people think they can lie through their teeth.
 
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
43
No, May was at The Home Office when the old Tory Paedo file "couldn't be found". Should I also mention that her department gave a huge contract to a firm that her husband holds shares in?

And while we're in the blue corner. What about the £360m promised for hospitals if we left the EU?
#

"Promised" by whom? certainly not the government of the day.
 

absolutelymilk

Established Member
Joined
18 Jul 2015
Messages
1,245
In all of this, what has Corbyn himself said that is not true?

If one of his staff has said something that is untrue, and he has not corrected it, then its not enough for him to blame the other person - he has had nearly a fortnight to correct it, and he didn't tell anyone.
 

thenorthern

Established Member
Joined
27 May 2013
Messages
4,127
Regarding the release of images we have an odd situation in England that there is no privacy laws and legally one can film something from a public place and broadcast it without restriction so I don't think releasing the images breaches any laws.

In any case though I think its Virgin Trains weren't happy about some politician telling them why they are wrong without evidence and effectively misleading the public. Good on them though as if Corbyn wants to accuse Virgin Trains of being overcrowded then he should provide evidence.
 

bnm

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2009
Messages
4,996
Ok, part public/part private built, but successfully specified and procured by a public company.

Arguably not successfully specified. Where's the 140mph running? BR specified a train that the infrastructure they built/upgraded couldn't cope with.
 

6Gman

Established Member
Joined
1 May 2012
Messages
8,452
Stitched up by praising their helpful staff? They could have replied publicly and said our records show there were 100 empty seats in Coach F, but they didn't.

But they don't have such records.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
39,207
Location
Yorks
Arguably not successfully specified. Where's the 140mph running? BR specified a train that the infrastructure they built/upgraded couldn't cope with.

Tilt was but a small aspect of the train design. We're still left with a highly successful fleet of high speed stock that has helped to grow passenger usage on the route over its existence and does so to this day.

To suggest otherwise is a simple untruth.
 

AlterEgo

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
20,374
Location
No longer here
This has pleased me so much today. Virgin Trains are very good at fighting back especially on Twitter & will argue their side. Never understand why so many TOCs roll over. Perhaps Corbyn should stick to the National Express coach network. It seems to suit him better.

I have no love for Virgin Trains but it's good to see a TOC throw a stone back from time to time.
 

matt_world2004

Established Member
Joined
5 Nov 2014
Messages
4,504
But they don't have such records.

London underground have software that estimates loadings on a london underground train to within a 2% accuracy based on etm data are you telling me a service whose large proportion of passengers are on an advance ticket can't, the shot of the reservation section in the video looks quite full actually the two gray seats are empty nut the rest appear full
 
Last edited:

Mainliner

Member
Joined
1 Nov 2010
Messages
256
Location
North Tyneside
Having used the ECML every week for 8 years, during which the only times (on a handful of occasions) I can recall seen people sitting on the floor - outside of rush hours - have been when there has been disruption or cancellations due to wires down/fatalities/failures, which clearly was not the case with Corbyn's train, I doubted the story from the outset - especially as I can confirm the less than full loadings on many services, as recently mentioned on another thread.

Most services I use have a number of unoccupied reserved seats, which anyone without a reservation can simply sit on after the reserved departure point, and easily move to another seat if the person who reserved it does happen to turn up later, but that wouldn't be as interesting for an accompanying TV crew.
 
Last edited:

jayah

On Moderation
Joined
18 Apr 2011
Messages
1,893
But they don't have such records.

Apparently they do because you can count them in the pictures. Except you can't because their CCTV splash isn't proving anything.

Let's suppose this upgraded family aren't a fairy story, the 3 or 4 other groups quoted and photographed also sitting on the floor aren't made up either and the train was fully reserved with some passengers in the toilet / buffet.

Who is defaming whom? Waiting 12 days until the ballot papers have hit the doormat? That could be fun to explain.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
So Corbyn wants more trains and lower fares.

Lovely.

Funded by ... ?

Not spending god knows how many £bn buying new nuclear weapons that we will never use.
 

bnm

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2009
Messages
4,996
Tilt was but a small aspect of the train design. We're still left with a highly successful fleet of high speed stock that has helped to grow passenger usage on the route over its existence and does so to this day.

To suggest otherwise is a simple untruth.

I made and make no claims about how successful the Class 91+Mk4 stock has been in growing passenger numbers.

I merely countered your assertions that the stock was built by a public company and was successfully specified.
 

Busaholic

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Jun 2014
Messages
14,161
Readers of a more venerable disposition may remember Jennifer's Ear and make comparisons. Come to think of it, Corbyn himself is old enough to remember (I almost said 'old enough to know better', but that may be wishful thinking on my part).
 
Last edited:

theironroad

Established Member
Joined
21 Nov 2014
Messages
3,710
Location
London
Having used the ECML every week for 8 years, during which the only times (on a handful of occasions) I can recall seen people sitting on the floor - outside of rush hours - have been when there has been disruption or cancellations due to wires down/fatalities/failures, which clearly was not the case with Corbyn's train, I doubted the story from the outset - especially as I can confirm the less than full loadings on many services, as recently mentioned on another thread.

Most services I use have a number of unoccupied reserved seats, which anyone without a reservation can simply sit on after the reserved departure point, and easily move to another seat if the person who reserved it does happen to turn up later, but that wouldn't be as interesting for an accompanying TV crew.

One of the best things Swt did was get rid of all seat reservations..

Most people don't dare tamper with seat reservation labels (as there is a fine if the letter of the byelaws is adhered to), so people walk past reservations or the seat is reserved for multiple parts of the train's journey.

There needs to be some reform of seat reservations, maybe all reservations should include a fee of £2, which might persuade people to see keep to their reservation or cancel it. People seat hopping doesn't help either, a person makes a reservation and boards the train but decides they don't like the seat or the view or direction etc and move to a unreserved seat but leaving their seat with a label in, thus deterring other passengers without any reservation.
 

Robertj21a

On Moderation
Joined
22 Sep 2013
Messages
7,526
Apparently they do because you can count them in the pictures. Except you can't because their CCTV splash isn't proving anything.

Let's suppose this upgraded family aren't a fairy story, the 3 or 4 other groups quoted and photographed also sitting on the floor aren't made up either and the train was fully reserved with some passengers in the toilet / buffet.

Who is defaming whom? Waiting 12 days until the ballot papers have hit the doormat? That could be fun to explain.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---


Not spending god knows how many £bn buying new nuclear weapons that we will never use.

I guess that you must be one of the Corbyn 'helpers' who have been thoroughly taken in [brainwashed] by his 'brave new world'............can I claim my prize now ?
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
39,207
Location
Yorks
I made and make no claims about how successful the Class 91+Mk4 stock has been in growing passenger numbers.

I merely countered your assertions that the stock was built by a public company and was successfully specified.

They were successfully specified. They've done the job they were built for well over the decades, along with the 125's.

Tilt would have been a nice to have, but a successful ECML in no way depended on it.
 
Last edited:

Master29

Established Member
Joined
19 Feb 2015
Messages
1,970
eh? What are you wittering on about. Corbyn, the great Mr Clean of politics, the great honest straight talker, the great red hope has been exposed as being economical with the truth. Just think about what this says about your hero. just think about how inept he and his campaign people have been shown to be.

So what do his £3 army do? They seek to attack and abuse any who dares voice a criticism of thier master. Your man messed up and has been caught out.


Like doesn`t the press of this little hovel of a nation like to kick this guy enough. He does this one thing wrong maybe and half the forum is wetting itself in fury.

'champagne socialists', 'JC made a booboo', 'the fascist right', Champagne socialsim', I'd advise a lie down in a cool room before you burst something

Corbyn has lied to put a false story in the press and he got caught out,Branson and Souter aren't pretending to be worthy of being Prime Minister, Corbyn is and Corbyn is a liar

No, they`re pretending to be worthy heads of a TOC . Tell that to the majority of their commuters.
 
Last edited:

jayah

On Moderation
Joined
18 Apr 2011
Messages
1,893
I guess that you must be one of the Corbyn 'helpers' who have been thoroughly taken in [brainwashed] by his 'brave new world'............can I claim my prize now ?

Actually not. It is a sad reflection on current political discourse that many people think anyone who does not think like them is 'one of those' whichever faction they inhabit.

It will be a sad day if a global multinational can flout its own policy and the DPA and get away with it.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Never use? You don't seem to understand the concept of a deterrent.

They haven't been a deterrent since Ronald Reagan because he was the last person mad enough to actually convince anyone that he would ever use them.

Anyone who did use Trident to kill a few million innocent Russians would only be 15 minutes further up the moral high ground than the person who fired their missiles first.
 

All Line Rover

Established Member
Joined
17 Feb 2011
Messages
5,223
Regarding the release of images we have an odd situation in England that there is no privacy laws and legally one can film something from a public place and broadcast it without restriction so I don't think releasing the images breaches any laws.

Not true (in numerous respects), although hardly applicable to Corbyn in this instance.
 

phoenixcronin

Member
Joined
30 Mar 2016
Messages
208
Location
London



Like doesn`t the press of this little hovel of a nation like to kick this guy enough. He does this one thing wrong maybe and half the forum is wetting itself in fury.



No, they`re pretending to be worthy heads of a TOC . Tell that to the majority of their commuters.


Ah I see so the media reporting on a factual story now amounts to "kicking this guy"? Would you like to set up a politburo where only news favourable to the dear leader is allowed?
 

Master29

Established Member
Joined
19 Feb 2015
Messages
1,970
Ah I see so the media reporting on a factual story now amounts to "kicking this guy"? Would you like to set up a politburo where only news favourable to the dear leader is allowed?

As opposed to supporting a Government that has systematically screwed the rail industry into the ground for years, eventually harps on about all the new projects it has going on and saying how great they are but conveniently omits that we still have an appallingly backward rail infrastructure mainly down to them. Err yes. It might have been a better option.
 

Tetchytyke

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Sep 2013
Messages
13,320
Location
Isle of Man
Do people seriously think that Virgin released these images without first taking advice as to the legality of doing so?

Yes. Yes I do.

ETA it seems Virgin have now edited the photo from coach F to provide pixellation to passengers. So yes, I DEFINITELY think they released without checking and editing properly!
 
Last edited:

EM2

Established Member
Joined
16 Nov 2008
Messages
7,522
Location
The home of the concrete cow
Ah I see so the media reporting on a factual story now amounts to "kicking this guy"? Would you like to set up a politburo where only news favourable to the dear leader is allowed?
Is it factual? All we know to be facts are that Corbyn got on a train, walked through some carriages, sat on the floor for a while, said some things to a camera, and then sat in a seat.
Everything else is implication, inference and conjecture.
 

Tetchytyke

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Sep 2013
Messages
13,320
Location
Isle of Man
Are you a lawyer who specialises in DPA issues. This chap is, he disagrees with you.

He's not a lawyer, and he is arguing that Virgin pixellated other passengers' faces. They didn't. The photo I posted showed several faces in coach F with no pixellation.

They could probably justify releasing Corbyn's image as he started it. But none of the other images. Even the pixellated faces are identifiable.

As for "jam packed", that's a subjective term, and I doubt any of us would agree on how to define a busy train.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top