I don't see why others should be turfed out of a seat they've sat in whilst it was unreserved.
Because it wasn't unreserved, it was potentially reserved. It is no different to sitting in a seat with a reservation label hoping that the occupier never comes.
If the train is quiet when you board, then you should have the foresight to sit somewhere else, there are plenty of seats which don't get taken by the TMR system. And if the train is very busy then it's no different to sitting in any other seat with a reservation: you win some, you lose some.
IMO this is just moaning from people who either a) can't read a sign or b) think it shouldn't apply to them.
bramling said:
Two problems:
1) Does the text message have the ability to reserve the specific seat you're in? That would be okay, but my understanding is this *isn't* the current situation. No good finding a nice seat, then do the reservation to find one is sitting facing the wrong way or against a bulkhead, as can be the case on Voyagers.
2) None of this is helpful if these are the only vacant seats on the train.
You can't reserve the specific seat you're in, but you can reserve
a seat. And if the train is so full you're getting turfed out of the seat, then beggars can't be choosers.
Wilts Wanderer said:
I've generally found the best way to avoid this issue is to vote with my feet (and backside) and travel with any other TOC but XC.
And will continue to do so until another franchisee improves matters, including more seats overall.
More seats overall are really what is needed, but unless and until the subsidy required by XC drops that isn't going to happen.
Travelling out of Leeds and York fairly regularly with work, I'm glad of the TMR system, and choose XC ahead of TPE because it exists.