Have they?
"I disagree with you, so you're an idiot" isn't much of a debate.
No, tax e-voidance is much, much worse.
But of course I'm not an ex-banker who made my money in a morally bankrupt industry, so I don't know what I'm talking about. Bless the proles, they know not of what they speak.
I didn’t use the word idiot, or prole, I said your previous (rather silly) comment makes you appear to be badly informed. If you are offended by that, I apologise. On the contrary it is you who has now lost the argument by making things personal.
You’re accusation that I’m an “ex banker” also belies a complete lack of knowledge - I’ve never even worked for a bank. What do you think a “banker” actually is, other than some kind of mythical bogeyman you’ve read about in the left press?
You should also remember financial services, and those evil bankers you hate so much, make a rather large contribution to the coffers of your beloved and untouchable NHS.
It’s very clear that, for you, public sector = good, private sector = bad, financial services = evil.
I prefer to debate in a reasoned and informed manner. There’s little pleasure, and precisely nothing to be learned, from discussions with those who view everything through a simplistic prism of “good and evil”, “moral and immoral” with next to no knowledge of experience of what they are talking about!
I suggest we now bring this debate to a close, until the next time...