Kernowfem
Member
Good picture. Is it just me or does anyone else think this class always looked creepy in some way?
Where did you take the pic?
Where did you take the pic?
there was no light reflecting from behind either
Good picture. Is it just me or does anyone else think this class always looked creepy in some way?
Where did you take the pic?
found it: http://victorialine67.locos.fpic.co.uk/p62048350.html
there was no light reflecting from behind either
Stood at the levers, which was why it appeared so strange, when the box was expected to have been switched out. I remember there was a short debate between the two and they reached the conclusion that something was "not right" and hence why they stopped.
You have to remember that they would have looked very foolish indeed if the box had been manned up especially, but they knew the box had been switched out because of the closure of the diverging route, and they had passed through there all week with the box switched out.
Speed-wise about 40/45 I would guess. No frontal headlights just simply a reporting number alight, so no reflections from loco lights.
Look chap I am not trying to put water on your bonfire here, but that is a classic reflection of the front of the lens.found it: http://victorialine67.locos.fpic.co.uk/p62048350.html
there was no light reflecting from behind either
I suspect I shall be able to meet you on arrival and tell you!
It looks like a mark on the window.
Look chap I am not trying to put water on your bonfire here, but that is a classic reflection of the front of the lens.
Well if it is an Inspector (or whoever) in the cab, they certainly look a pit pale!![]()
It'd be fairly easy to prove the existance of a ghost. You take the ghost along to the guy who's offering the $1M and introduce him as a being that can be seen, but has no 'substance'. It would be able to walk through solid objects, one presumes, it may locally lower the room temperature, and perhaps have magnetic effects - all the usual 'ghostly' attributes.
Scientists and technitions can confirm that no technical trickery is taking place - no projected images or laser holograms being used to create the 'ghost' image.
But... where do you find such a complicient ghost? Reports of sightings are by individuals and are fleeting, so impossible to verify. Why is that, one wonders?
If the supernatural exists, why doesn't it show itself in some sort on incontravertible way? Perhaps a 'ghost soldier' walking across the Mall at the Changing of the Guard, or appearing at the cenotaph on Remebrance Sunday, in full view of thousands of spectators and recorded of thousands of video machines and national TV? As I asked earlier, a 'ghost train' Rocket witnessed simultaniously by hundreds of commuters at a busy rush hour station, would take some rational explaining.
But these events never happen. Call me a cynic, but if all the reported 'events' happen in circumstances which makes them unverifyable, and never in public and in a way that leaves no rationally-unexplainable evidence trail, then it's probably becuase there is no such thing.
Once there was thought to be such evidence - some little girls took some photos in their garden which, on developing, showed the images of fairys. It was unexplainable at the time, but modern forensic techniques exposed them as falsified images.
So I don't think our man in the 'States would need to move any goalposts. He would simply demand incontravertible evidence (as opposed to alleged and unprovable personal experiences) that the supernatural exists - there is not one jot, anywhere.
I wonder why that is?![]()
CS, I think we all understand your viewpoint, and I admit I tend to agree with it. But there's no need to constantly spout bull**** on this rather interesting and intriguing thread.
If you had posted once explaining your viewpoint, fair enough. But over and over you have ridiculed everyone, including OT who I happen to know is very well liked and respected.
Whilst I don't necessarily believe all the stories, I like to be able to read them and have a tingle sent down my spine, and leave it at that. I don't want then to read pages of disputes over whether they are true or not.
And I don't think they are all "wibble". I said "I tend to agree", not "you are right and everyone else is wrong".