Geezertronic
Established Member
There is a lot of guff in this thread so I got bored of reading the first couple of pages so apologies if this has been asked before, but what rules have been broken here? Genuine question?
Wrong. It was that children could move between split parents to make legal contact with both. No merger that were for couple who dont live together to see each other.
It is not about members of the public, this is about senior advisers to the government ignoring it's own instructions, then going on to say it was fine for them. Don't be distracted by thinking that because some of the public had done similar that this makes this unimportant. This is about how the government acts, and how it remains consistent with it's own mandate. If they tell the public one thing, then do another themselves, this becomes a serious problem for reasons that by now should be obvious.
And it seems the political fallout has begun:
Er the lockdown rules .There is a lot of guff in this thread so I got bored of reading the first couple of pages so apologies if this has been asked before, but what rules have been broken here? Genuine question?
I do think it’s strange that this story took so long to be made public. I wondered if the media were concerned about undermining lockdown but then they were happy to print the stories about Stephen Kinnock, Tahir Ali and Robert Jenrick’s lockdown transgressions. Why was Cummins not outed at the time unless his travel to his family estate wasn’t seen as newsworthy enough at the time, maybe the later report of him being seen at Barnard Castle added weight to the story.
Like I said it's all a political game, I don't really care and I'm not getting my knickers in a twist about it.
I see hypocrisy all over it, media, politics and anti cummings factions making something out of it.
Er the lockdown rules .
Self isolate if anyone has symptoms for 14 day's , stay in primary residence etc.Which ones in particular?
The Government unsurprisingly are trying, but with Douglas Ross now resigning over the whole affair specifically that's just prolonged it a bit further.Some people are now calling for the matter to be put behind us and get on with the job in hand of dealing with COVID but this would amount to sweeping the matter under the carpet.
Leaving one's home without reasonable excuse (Health Protection Coronavirus Regulation 6) and now it also seems driving while unfit (must be against something like the Road Traffic Regulation Act).There is a lot of guff in this thread so I got bored of reading the first couple of pages so apologies if this has been asked before, but what rules have been broken here? Genuine question?
I don’t think Dominic Cummings done anything wrong and any parent worth their salt would agree if they had the same options as he had would have done the same thing
Don't go for unreasonably long drives to do your "exercise"Which ones in particular?
Yes it is a political game, and one with serious potential consequences. If ministers and their advisers can get away with possibly ignoring their own instructions / guidelines, how long before they become confident to make the next step and ignore laws, Parliamentary protocols etc? Politicians will often push the boundaries, and in well balanced democracies these are countered with checks, balances and most importantly accountability. Let those slip, and democracy quickly erodes. Just take a look at what's happening over the pond, with Trump's administration trying to blur the lines, bypass protocols & gain advantages by lying & bullying. Is this what we want here?
The idea of going for a drive on non major roads to check your fitness to drive makes sense. The day of the family trip to Barnard Castle could have also been justified on the grounds of exercise (as the trip happened after all family members no longer had symptoms, and he had also been cleared by a doctor). Quite why a story about eyesight was given I don’t really understand.
I do not share you belief in that. Single parents were told to contact social services for child help if they have no local family, specifically to avoid them taking the virus across country to family, so I think that the police who were then using drones to harass dog walkers would have known that and ordered ill single parents home even if they did not issue them a verbalised fine.I find it astounding that some people would be so determined to avoid any possible breach of a law that carried a £30 fine that they would put their young children at risk of being left with incapacited parent(s). I am sure some people did that but they would have never have been fined if stopped by the police on the way to stay with their sister.
They have all spoken out. Is it that the media do not need to cover them when even government ministers are criticising?I've noticed opposition leaders have been very quiet over this, makes me wonder if they are doing the same thing and is glad the spotlight is on Cummings.
I've noticed opposition leaders have been very quiet over this, makes me wonder if they are doing the same thing and is glad the spotlight is on Cummings.
They have all spoken out. Is it that the media do not need to cover them when even government ministers are criticising?
No doubting that they are all as bad as each other. Don't forget that the Scottish Chief medical officer Dr Calderwood , had to go in the end.I've seen nothing, no obvious links, chances are its been buried under the avalanche self righteous hypocrisy and media circus.
And she went on 5 April, a week before Teflon Don's jolly to Barnard Castle. He should have known when he made that trip that it was a sacking offence. He does not seem to think that rules apply to him.No doubting that they are all as bad as each other. Don't forget that the Scottish Chief medical officer Dr Calderwood , had to go in the end.
I've noticed opposition leaders have been very quiet over this, makes me wonder if they are doing the same thing and is glad the spotlight is on Cummings.
I've seen nothing, no obvious links, chances are its been buried under the avalanche self righteous hypocrisy and media circus.
SDLP leader Colum Eastwood has called on the Prime Minister to sack Dominic Cummings and prove that "the privileged Tory elite" are not unaccountable.
And Alliance deputy leader Stephen Farry said the actions of Boris Johnson and his special adviser conveyed "a sense of entitlement and hypocrisy".
No doubting that they are all as bad as each other. Don't forget that the Scottish Chief medical officer Dr Calderwood , had to go in the end.
The thing with it all and makes me laugh. His excuses make no sense and are very tenuous . He went on to Barnard castle on his wife's birthday and this was almost certainly a jolly , got spotted and pretends it's for childcare. In my view.And she went on 5 April, a week before Teflon Don's jolly to Barnard Castle. He should have known when he made that trip that it was a sacking offence. He does not seem to think that rules apply to him.
Self isolate if anyone has symptoms for 14 day's , stay in primary residence etc.
Of course in the end this will all go away but the fact that Boris' approval ratings have fallen by 20% since the weekend suggests that it is NOT simply a minority who are concerned about this appalling behaviour.They all are in the end, neither Labour, LibDems, SNP, Plaid Cymru nor is the Conservatives can claim to be the paragon of virtue.
Memory is short and limited when you have a political axe to grind that in the heat of righteous rage they forget their own errors of judgements, glass houses and stones comes to mind.
So in your opinion, the "reasonable excuse" answer does not apply here?
That's my opinion , yes.So in your opinion, the "reasonable excuse" answer does not apply here?