Please see the dedicated thread if anyone wishes to the discuss the disappointing news about Eurostar's services to the South of France which can be found here.
I think you should get yourself up to speed on Amsterdam (and Rotterdam) - Shell and Unilever alone pack out these trains. The fact that you initially called it quaint means I think you should re-acquaint with the changes thereI think you are reading too many Amsterdam City promotional leaflets. Netflixs EMA HQ in Amsterdam employees would comfortably fit on one Eurostar.
Amsterdam may well be expanding but it remains the capital of whats a peripheral (if likeable enough from a British perspective) nation in Europe.
Realistically its not in the top ten European Business Hubs let alone competing for the second spot.
I would not be surprised if that factored in things like letterbox or near letterbox companies for fiscal reasons.![]()
List of EU metropolitan regions by GDP - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
^ shows the combined value of the Rotterdam and Amsterdam economies as the second largest in Europe behind Paris.
I would not be surprised if that factored in things like letterbox or near letterbox companies for fiscal reasons.
When did NL become a tax haven (genuine question)?I would not be surprised if that factored in things like letterbox or near letterbox companies for fiscal reasons.
The reintroduction of a daily Amsterdam service next month shows Eurostar is committed to the route. Hopefully we will see 3tpd direct in both directions this year and upto 5tpd by end of next year.
Edit: removed references to South of France service.
Will services actually resume seems one train a day for some time now?
No but it often is used as an intermediate point on money's way to a tax haven.When did NL become a tax haven (genuine question)?
Through services were due to start in April IIRC - I imagine staffing the security might be the issue for now.The Man in Seat 61 has tweeted the following:
“Eurostar will reinstate a direct London to Amsterdam train from 9 July, though return service will still involve a change in Brussels”
Disappointing that the change in Brussels on the return leg still remains. I thought this problem had been sorted.
Probably that is correct for the time being, hopefully the new through service back to London from Amsterdam will happen in the not too distant future.Through services were due to start in April IIRC - I imagine staffing the security might be the issue for now.
Maybe Eurostar doesn't see the cost of providing the staff worth it to allow a through service to operate again from Amsterdam to London, and to be fair I have no likelihood of wanting to use the service in the near future anyway, but I will never use the Eurostar from Amsterdam to London if a change in Brussels is required, like I won't use the (apparently not running anyway) Lyon-London service with a change required in Lille.
Not because I can't change, I simply won't.
But there will be plenty of other potential travellers now and in future who can't or won't also.
I guess Eurostar is taking the view currently that passenger numbers on the Amsterdam-London service will be down anyway, and that those who are travelling either can't choose to avoid the Brussels shuffle, or don't mind it. When things return more to normal, then the need to attract more customers to more services might see the direct services reinstated along with the extra staff apparently required.
I get this. I've never done the Lille change - I think also a 5+ hour train journey is repetitive if soon after, so many will fly one way anyway. Probably home.Maybe Eurostar doesn't see the cost of providing the staff worth it to allow a through service to operate again from Amsterdam to London, and to be fair I have no likelihood of wanting to use the service in the near future anyway, but I will never use the Eurostar from Amsterdam to London if a change in Brussels is required, like I won't use the (apparently not running anyway) Lyon-London service with a change required in Lille.
Not because I can't change, I simply won't.
But there will be plenty of other potential travellers now and in future who can't or won't also.
I guess Eurostar is taking the view currently that passenger numbers on the Amsterdam-London service will be down anyway, and that those who are travelling either can't choose to avoid the Brussels shuffle, or don't mind it. When things return more to normal, then the need to attract more customers to more services might see the direct services reinstated along with the extra staff apparently required.
Regarding the non-direct Amsterdam - London service: due to the coronavirus, the agreements between the countries for the border controls hadn't been signed yet. Those were signed today, which means that testing can now go ahead.
The direct services will launch this fall (no exact date as of yet).
Article from the Dutch Ministry: https://www.nieuwsienw.nl/1707140.aspx?t=Sneller-met-de-trein-naar-Londen
Thank you, that's really helpful.Article from the Dutch Ministry: https://www.nieuwsienw.nl/1707140.aspx?t=Sneller-met-de-trein-naar-Londen
Faster by train to London
07-07-2020
In Brussels, today the treaties have been signed by the Netherlands, France, Belgium and the United Kingdom that enable a faster train journey to London.
On behalf of the Netherlands, State Secretary Stientje van Veldhoven (I&W) signed the agreements on border controls and security. As of this autumn, the passport and security check will be done in Amsterdam and Rotterdam. It is then no longer necessary to leave the train in Brussels. That saves an hour of travel time.
“We are still living in corona times, but of course we also look ahead. Soon you will travel comfortably, easily and therefore quickly by train from Amsterdam to London. No more hassle with checks and delays in Brussels. A Eurostar train has roughly twice as many seats as an average plane and CO2 emissions per passenger are considerably lower. This makes the train to London a real sustainable and fully-fledged alternative to flying, "said State Secretary Van Veldhoven.
Earlier, the first direct Eurostar between Amsterdam and London was planned to run at the end of April. However, due to the corona crisis, passenger numbers have fallen sharply and Eurostar therefore stopped the connection between the Netherlands and the United Kingdom in March. As a result, the test phase for the direct connection (without delay in Brussels) has also been delayed. With corona measures eased and more frequent travel, Eurostar will start a daily train between Amsterdam and London on 9 July. Depending on the developments around Corona and thus the number of passengers, the intention is that this train will run twice a day in August, followed in the autumn by a third train a day. In the autumn, the direct trips from Amsterdam to London will start.
With the signing of the treaties, the Netherlands undertakes, among other things, the obligation to guarantee the security of trains passing through the Channel Tunnel in the Netherlands. The further arrangements are based on the existing security treaty for train services through the Channel Tunnel that was concluded in 1993 between France, the UK and Belgium.
The Home Office-led treaty concerning Frontier Control arrangements extends the existing model of “juxtaposed border checks” to the Netherlands; whereby passengers are checked, prior to departure, successively by border officials from the departure and arrival countries.
This means UK Border Force officials will be stationed in Amsterdam and Rotterdam and able to carry out checks before boarding, as they already do in France and Belgium. It also allows for further cooperation between the police forces of the 4 countries involved in the fight against cross-border crime.
I think London is among the top for this. Buy a nice LLC, pay a firm in Mayfair and off you go. (see private eye)No but it often is used as an intermediate point on money's way to a tax haven.
Certainly for the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man.I think London is among the top for this. Buy a nice LLC, pay a firm in Mayfair and off you go. (see private eye)
That's good news!