I don’t want to make any jokes that cause a fence...There's some sort of joke in there about Borderline Personality Disorder and The Wall. Time for a mini competition - Ready, Steady, Joke?
I don’t want to make any jokes that cause a fence...There's some sort of joke in there about Borderline Personality Disorder and The Wall. Time for a mini competition - Ready, Steady, Joke?
Well it made me chuckle! Seems you may have come first in a field of one, but better than I could manage.....I don’t want to make any jokes that cause a fence...
That's the nature of the Electoral College. It's possible to win the Presidency with something like 38% of the popular vote!I think people have now started to realises that 6 million votes extra for Biden means nothing...
A delusional person believes the things they have seen/heard, but that doesn't mean that they are real!I do believe trump believes there was some skulduggery with the election, but no one seems to have the correct answer to counter argue his points.
I think delusional might be a better description.......I'm listening to this now. I had assumed that Trump really knew he lost but was just blustering in order to sabotage Biden's presidency and help his own chances in 2024. Instead, it's clear that he's insane.
I doubt it. Even the most loyal Trumpists don't rate DJTJ that highly. Ivanka would have a better chance.And the bigger problem is that Trump Junior might get elected in 2024 or 2028.
That's the nature of the Electoral College. It's possible to win the Presidency with something like 38% of the popular vote!
A delusional person believes the things they have seen/heard, but that doesn't mean that they are real!
They will find some with charm for 2024 and then the fireworks will go.I doubt it. Even the most loyal Trumpists don't rate DJTJ that highly. Ivanka would have a better chance.
The counter to his "points" is to ask where is the evidence.but no one seems to have the correct answer to counter argue his points.
Biden did enough for a convincing victory both in the electoral college and in the popular vote. This would not have been in any doubt, had Trump not behaved as he has.Biden was not a great canadate and did rather poorly where needed to, losing nearly all the bellwether counties, two state that the winner tended to win etc it wouldn't take much for charm esq trump person to take back the white house
Biden did enough for a convincing victory both in the electoral college and in the popular vote. This would not have been in any doubt, had Trump not behaved as he has.
The problem is that the Democrats did less well in the elections for the House (reduced majority), Senate (will gain control by a shoestring only if they win both Georgia re-runs) and in various State assemblies (many of which have the power to gerrymander the upcoming round of boundary reassignments for the House). The lack of control in the Senate, especially, would severely limit Biden's freedom to enact changes domestically.
Number one rule of Trump: He only accuses others of things he either has done, or wants to do.Given the recent stuff about Trump asking them to "find votes" for him to beat Biden, I suspect a lot of his claims are just pure projection.
I mean, Trump lost the popular vote in 2016 by almost 3 million votes.Just enough and not much more to win, wining 10'000 votes out nearly 5million to win a state is poor. your right just just limped over the line where it matted and nothing more. Biden just seems like someone singing to his converts and did little to convince the trump people to switch sides. The democrats need to widen their base to help stop this again.
Georgia hasn't voted Democrat for several decades, and Biden also won in multiple other swing states so even if the result there was reversed it wouldn't keep Trump in power.Just enough and not much more to win, wining 10'000 votes out nearly 5million to win a state is poor. your right just just limped over the line where it matted and nothing more. Biden just seems like someone singing to his converts and did little to convince the trump people to switch sides. The democrats need to widen their base to help stop this again.
Again the 7million means nothing. In the UK Labour did this in 1951, it got more votes than the Tories but still lost, its no good racking up the votes in your safe seats. Biden won the 3 swing states with a combine vote of 45K votes, its tiny margins. It really is "limping over the line". He did but just. Obama, on the other hand even with his losses in 2012 still managed a more evenly spread vote across the USA and had much better margins in each state he won.I mean, Trump lost the popular vote in 2016 by almost 3 million votes.
So I am not sure how Biden winning the popular vote by around 7 million votes this time around can be labelled as "limping over the line".
I do wonder if that imagery specifically is more down to how the votes were counted in a lot of states. I wonder if the mail in ballots had been counted everywhere first, which likely would have put Biden in the lead right away, would people still try to claim he only just "limped over the line" to win the result, or would the imagery be instead that he had a solid lead that he never gave up.
Some of the investigations in New York are, as I understand it, at the federal level and therefore pardonable by a President. If Trump resigns Pence can pardon him, as happened for Nixon and Ford. But there are likely to be some state-level investigations that could result in non-pardonable charges, and even if Biden doesn't want to pursue anything I would imagine some politically ambitious Democratic prosecutor would fancy a crack at it.
I just don't agree.Again the 7million means nothing. In the UK Labour did this in 1951, it got more votes than the Tories but still lost, its no good racking up the votes in your safe seats. Biden won the 3 swing states with a combine vote of 45K votes, its tiny margins. It really is "limping over the line". He did but just. Obama, on the other hand even with his losses in 2012 still managed a more evenly spread vote across the USA and had much better margins in each state he won.
Its the fact USA is becoming more polarised, any winner in 2024 may once again lost the popular vote , but still win if they can tap into the right places.
That's the nature of the electoral college system. Trump won in 2016 by a few tens of thousands of votes as well.Biden won the 3 swing states with a combine vote of 45K votes, its tiny margins. It really is "limping over the line". He did but just.
Don't get me wrong - I don't think Biden was that great either.Then we just have to agree to disagree, I dont think biden was great he was lack lustier and only really appeal to his base vote not the wider country, who truly hated trump.
Its an awful system isn't it?That's the nature of the electoral college system. Trump won in 2016 by a few tens of thousands of votes as well.
ISTR that the 2017 election came down to less than a thousand votes.As I said, we have the same issue in the UK too where I believe the last few elections were decided by just a few thousand people in some swing consistencies.
To me that says people were quite happy to vote Republican, so either they were concerned about the direction that the Democrats in Congress or elsewhere appeared to be taking but were quite happy to vote for the moderate, Biden; or, they weren't prepared to vote for Trump. Trump himself said that he was not popular with suburban women and Covid-19 has been a complete catastrophe as far as many Americans are concerned. The Democrats may have a problem in 2024, Biden will be 81 going on 82, Kamala Harris is going to really have to prove her electability to avoid a many candidate fight for the candidacy if (as I expect) Biden just serves the one term - and she may not get the support from the men in grey suits, it could get nasty.The problem is that the Democrats did less well in the elections for the House (reduced majority), Senate (will gain control by a shoestring only if they win both Georgia re-runs) and in various State assemblies (many of which have the power to gerrymander the upcoming round of boundary reassignments for the House).
Good news for wildlife in Africa. More seriously, they ought to select someone untainted by Trump, his performance in the last eight weeks will not endear him to moderates. The MAGA crew will vote Republican no matter what, it is the middle ground that need convincing.And the bigger problem is that Trump Junior might get elected in 2024 or 2028.
I agree. Ivanka seems to know when to keep quiet, and when she does talk rubbish, it is not so obvious that she is doing so. I also get the impression that Donald John Senior would support her. Donny just talks drivel, he is the sort of person who tries to argue that it is 'day' when it is quite obviously 'night', he makes George W. seem like Einstein, so will be very easy to caricature - the late night chat shows will love him. I've heard an interview with Mary Trump - she reckons he is the most stupid.I doubt it. Even the most loyal Trumpists don't rate DJTJ that highly. Ivanka would have a better chance.
Agreed. There's possibly a desire for "Trumpism without Trump" and/or people are put off by things like the Democrats "defunding the police", which is actually a pretty sensible policy but given a stupid name that Republicans can use to play on people's fears.To me that says people were quite happy to vote Republican, so either they were concerned about the direction that the Democrats in Congress or elsewhere appeared to be taking but were quite happy to vote for the moderate, Biden; or, they weren't prepared to vote for Trump. Trump himself said that he was not popular with suburban women and Covid-19 has been a complete catastrophe as far as many Americans are concerned. The Democrats may have a problem in 2024, Biden will be 81 going on 82, Kamala Harris is going to really have to prove her electability to avoid a many candidate fight for the candidacy if (as I expect) Biden just serves the one term - and she may not get the support from the men in grey suits, it could get nasty.
Agreed. There's possibly a desire for "Trumpism without Trump" and/or people are put off by things like the Democrats "defunding the police", which is actually a pretty sensible policy but given a stupid name that Republicans can use to play on people's fears.
Florida has a lot of people with relations in Cuba and Venezuala.People clearly do love Trumpism without Trump, they also dislike Democrat and there rather far left view point, hence how trump managed to hold on to Florida. That slogan was stupid and it would have been better to stay " Reform the police" alas some people really did mean get rid of them.
Their reward will be another "Trump" in a few years who in more right wing but also far more charismatic (and may also be a person of colour).
Trump is a person of colour. It's orange.
What was the colour of those hard-working little Oompa Loompa chaps in the Gene Wilder film version of "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory"?
I wonder if the present incumbent in the White House is one of those who made his escape?
Indeed. The challenges would need to be supported by a majority in both the House and the Senate which is never going to happen. So all the dirty dozen are doing is confirming that their loyalty is to Trump rather than the country or the Constitution.So far twelve GOP senators have indicated they'll oppose the certification which may lead to a small delay in finalising the result but zero chance of changing it. More popcorn viewing, I feel.