• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 484 replacing class 483 on the island line: progress updates

Status
Not open for further replies.

Irascible

Established Member
Joined
21 Apr 2020
Messages
2,006
Location
Dyfneint
In effect this work is being done for the next 30+ years. It therefore seems to me to be worth doing it well, so the line and its stations will require few if any repairs in that time.
One would think if they're doing it over the long term they'd lower the track back down again instead ( I'm assuming it was raised when the tube stock first turned up ).
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

AndyW33

Member
Joined
12 Aug 2013
Messages
534
I'm not sure that the track was lowered (and indeed don't see how that would be possible at Pier Head). before the tube stock, there were just the Edwardian non-corridor coaches with footboards.
 

Journeyman

Established Member
Joined
16 Apr 2014
Messages
6,295
I'm not sure that the track was lowered (and indeed don't see how that would be possible at Pier Head). before the tube stock, there were just the Edwardian non-corridor coaches with footboards.
Pier Head was significantly rebuilt as part of electrification, with a completely altered layout. The platform/track heights were altered at that time.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,447
One would think if they're doing it over the long term they'd lower the track back down again instead ( I'm assuming it was raised when the tube stock first turned up ).
They have lowered the track at Brading, and Sandown. Presumably they have chosen the appropriate solution for each location? But this discussion is probably repeating what’s in the infrastructure thread...
 

Nogoohwell

Member
Joined
14 Aug 2020
Messages
53
Location
London
hope someone saves the cabs off the ones being scraped, seems a waste if not.....id have had one in the garden :lol:
I would have the cab of one as the front of my shed!
Actually this is a bloody good business idea. Take train cabs and turn them into a shed. I'm thinking class 442's and anything with a gangway door would be perfect.
 

VEP3417

Member
Joined
27 Jun 2011
Messages
710
Location
Hampshire
now theres an idea......seems to be quite a bit of interior stuff left inside as well. old hand rails/partitions ect, all worth money to enthusiasts, never understand why a lot of train stuff isnt sold off before scrapping, make more money on top of the scrap value
 

Gloster

Established Member
Joined
4 Sep 2020
Messages
8,445
Location
Up the creek
Fifteen years or so ago German railways were offering old buffers for sale; they had been cleaned and polished up. Suggested uses included as a garden seat.
 

Bob Price

Member
Joined
8 Aug 2019
Messages
1,036
In the mid 70's Swindon had a Warship taken from the scrap queue and allowed enthusiasts to gut it as part of an open day at Swindon works. Wouldn't be allowed today, but I agree, gutting a 483 of sellable parts even if it raised money for charity.
 

richardlong

Member
Joined
25 Nov 2020
Messages
14
Location
London
I'm not sure that the track was lowered (and indeed don't see how that would be possible at Pier Head). before the tube stock, there were just the Edwardian non-corridor coaches with footboards.
Prior to the introduction of tube stock in 1967 the track at Pier Head was raised to suit the new trains, while the platforms at Esplanade were lowered. The other stations were left as they had been, although some were evidently adjusted over the following decades - Brading, for example, was never at the right height for the tube stock.

Smallbrook and Lake of course were added later and so were built at the correct height for tube stock.
 

Gloster

Established Member
Joined
4 Sep 2020
Messages
8,445
Location
Up the creek
I had a look at the new decking at Esplanade today, including an uncovered end. It looks to me to be of the standard that is designed for temporary installations, rather than permanent use. It will be interesting to see whether it copes satisfactorily with long-term usage, or whether in a couple of years it will have to be replaced as it has cracked and warped too much for safety.
 

Marlin

New Member
Joined
21 Jan 2021
Messages
4
Location
Rlsgm2021**
I have been wondering how long it will be before Sandown station will be singled .

Can’t see SWR keeping platform 2 open and the associated costs when it’s not needed and not sure there is enough new stock nor demand for a 20 minute survive
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
17,776
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
I know its my own post, but I have now had a closer look at these photos and videos. It looks as though the 'craning out' was of more than just one class 483 unit. Can anyone help with a) how many and which units are involved and b) where they are heading?

So far units 483002 and 009 have been lifted out. They are destined for return to the mainland (think they may already have made the crossing), and are believed to be heading for scrap. Booths has been mentioned, but can’t confirm that.

As far as is known the rest are for preservation.
 

47444

Member
Joined
10 Aug 2019
Messages
282
So far units 483002 and 009 have been lifted out. They are destined for return to the mainland (think they may already have made the crossing), and are believed to be heading for scrap. Booths has been mentioned, but can’t confirm that.

As far as is known the rest are for preservation.
Thanks.

I had not noted that 004 was being preserved.
 

Chris125

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2009
Messages
3,076
I have been wondering how long it will be before Sandown station will be singled .

Can’t see SWR keeping platform 2 open and the associated costs when it’s not needed and not sure there is enough new stock nor demand for a 20 minute survive

Don't forget SWR only lease the infrastructure, significant rationalisation is surely a matter for Network Rail. As the electrics controlling the loop are being replaced it will probably remain for a while yet.

Prior to the introduction of tube stock in 1967 the track at Pier Head was raised to suit the new trains, while the platforms at Esplanade were lowered. The other stations were left as they had been, although some were evidently adjusted over the following decades - Brading, for example, was never at the right height for the tube stock.

It was much more obvious with the Standard Stock - new or modified platforms were built to their height, the others had an obvious step. The 483s were a compromise height so the difference is a lot less obvious, hence the understandable confusion.
 

Journeyman

Established Member
Joined
16 Apr 2014
Messages
6,295
It was much more obvious with the Standard Stock - new or modified platforms were built to their height, the others had an obvious step. The 483s were a compromise height so the difference is a lot less obvious, hence the understandable confusion.
483s and Standard stock board at the same height. In Underground days there were both 1938 and 1960 Stock units with Standard stock trailers in them, and the floor heights were all the same.
 

Chris125

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2009
Messages
3,076
No issue with stepping height at Ryde St Johns! Thanks to James for recording this.


483s and Standard stock board at the same height. In Underground days there were both 1938 and 1960 Stock units with Standard stock trailers in them, and the floor heights were all the same.

True, but 483s were modified quite extensively by NSE and it seems this was one of the changes made - not much, perhaps 2-3 inches, but just enough to reduce the worst stepping heights as can be seen below:


Island Line Class 483 by EUPARO(ゆーぱろ), on Flickr

485041 Ryde Pier Head by Tony Walmsley, on Flickr

Ryde Pier Head by Kevin McGowan, on Flickr

Capacity Load from Pier Head by leylandbus, on Flickr

The down platform at Sandown must have been ridiculous before the 483s came along...
 
Last edited:

MotCO

Established Member
Joined
25 Aug 2014
Messages
4,135
No issue with stepping height at Ryde St Johns! Thanks to James for recording this.




True, but 483s were modified quite extensively by NSE and it seems this was one of the changes made - not much, perhaps 2-3 inches, but just enough to reduce the worst stepping heights as can be seen below:


Island Line Class 483
by EUPARO(ゆーぱろ), on Flickr

485041 Ryde Pier Head
by Tony Walmsley, on Flickr

Ryde Pier Head
by Kevin McGowan, on Flickr

Capacity Load from Pier Head
by leylandbus, on Flickr

The down platform at Sandown must have been ridiculous before the 483s came along...

Was the canopy at Ryde St Johns adjusted for the new trains - from the video, there doesn't seem to be much clearance, unless it is just the angle of the video?
 

Chris125

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2009
Messages
3,076
Last edited:

ls2270

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2012
Messages
3,644
484002 and 484003 are out testing tonight between Eastleigh and Fareham as 5Q84 to 5Q87.
 

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
9,297
Location
Between Edinburgh and Exeter
Pretty sure they haven't but if you zoom in it's definitely a tad tight...


484001 Ryde St Johns Road 01/04/2021
by James_Pilbeam, on Flickr

More problematic is the other end - not only does the canopy droop, but there's a helpful downpipe to get in the way.


Ryde St Johns Road
by R~P~M, on Flickr

That's one reason why I'm surprised they didn't chose to lower the track through there. Hopefully there will not be any clearance issues further down the line, although at Shanklin they do appear to be lowering the track (or at least something significant enough to be altering the platforms).
 

Chris125

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2009
Messages
3,076
That's one reason why I'm surprised they didn't chose to lower the track through there. Hopefully there will not be any clearance issues further down the line, although at Shanklin they do appear to be lowering the track (or at least something significant enough to be altering the platforms).

To be fair even if the canopy needs some minor adjustment that's vastly cheaper than lowering the track - especially with pointwork and drainage to consider. Shanklin and Brading stations are both listed which appears to be justifying a more traditional and sympathetic approach....
 

philthetube

Established Member
Joined
5 Jan 2016
Messages
3,762
No issue with stepping height at Ryde St Johns! Thanks to James for recording this.




True, but 483s were modified quite extensively by NSE and it seems this was one of the changes made - not much, perhaps 2-3 inches, but just enough to reduce the worst stepping heights as can be seen below:
Not arguing with you because I don't know, but I cannot imagine how they would change the step height, the only possible option I could see would be to use different size wheels, which would mean changing the bogies.
 

Chris125

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2009
Messages
3,076
Movement... and a two-tone horn? I did wonder if the whistle would be an issue on the mainland.


Not arguing with you because I don't know, but I cannot imagine how they would change the step height, the only possible option I could see would be to use different size wheels, which would mean changing the bogies.

Perhaps the same way Vivarail lifted the 230s? GWR raised their Turbo fleet in recent years too so it can be done.

Going by these measurements for the 483s their overall height is 2946mm, whereas the 1938 stock was apparently 2883mm - a number much more consistent with other deep tube designs.
 
Last edited:

Chris125

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2009
Messages
3,076
But, perhaps the normal horn is about to become an issue on the Island. It might be that ORR now require it, especially with the foot crossings.

Seems not, according to someone in the know they've been fitted temporarily for testing on the mainland
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top