• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Heaton Derailment 22/03/22

Status
Not open for further replies.

plugwash

Established Member
Joined
29 May 2015
Messages
1,823
Depending which published figure you believe ( they vary ) a Chinook can lift between 10-12 tonnes.
According to wikipedia the largest helicopter in the world, the mil-mi 26 has a payload capacity of 20 tonnes. It has exceptionally lifted 25 tonnes before but was then sent back to the factory for inspection before it was used again.

According to https://www.railengineer.co.uk/wp-c.../Table-1-Hitachi-800-802-orders-V3-Avenir.pdf a class 802 has a tare mass of 243 tonnes, if we assume all the cars weigh the same that works out to 43 tonnes per car.

The numbers just don't seem to work for lifting out a rail car by helicopter unless significant lightening work is done first.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Joined
3 Mar 2020
Messages
519
Location
Furness
According to wikipedia the largest helicopter in the world, the mil-mi 26 has a payload capacity of 20 tonnes. It has exceptionally lifted 25 tonnes before but was then sent back to the factory for inspection before it was used again.

According to https://www.railengineer.co.uk/wp-c.../Table-1-Hitachi-800-802-orders-V3-Avenir.pdf a class 802 has a tare mass of 243 tonnes, if we assume all the cars weigh the same that works out to 43 tonnes per car.

The numbers just don't seem to work for lifting out a rail car by helicopter unless significant lightening work is done first.
Who's going to sign the risk assessment for having a go at lifting that then?
 

Spartacus

Established Member
Joined
25 Aug 2009
Messages
3,396
Is it just me, or does the 800 class seem to be involved in more mishaps than the HST? Or are they just widely reported than in earlier times?

Well I think there's roughly twice as many 80X sets now than there ever were HSTs, and they're used more intensively, but, yeah, I think things get pounced upon and dwelled on more now, and of course it's fresh in the memory. I don't think something like this would have got much of a mention even in the railway press of the day, with fatal rail accidents being sadly regular events. Largely forgotten now are the brake problems, exhaust faults with coolant loss, de-rated engines and complaints from guards leading to the creation of the TGSs that impacted the HSTs.
 

LowLevel

Established Member
Joined
26 Oct 2013
Messages
8,260
Is it just me, or does the 800 class seem to be involved in more mishaps than the HST? Or are they just widely reported than in earlier times?
HSTs ended up on their side more than once at Neville Hill. Just perception.
 

sprinterguy

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Mar 2010
Messages
11,343
Location
Macclesfield
HSTs ended up on their side more than once at Neville Hill. Just perception.
Indeed - Sideswipes and shunting collisions on depots involving HSTs weren't uncommon during the eighties. Not to mention that the East Coast HST sets in particular were involved in two fairly dramatic derailments in passenger service within around five years of them entering traffic - Northallerton in 1979 and Tyne Yard in 1984.
 

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
5,511
Last edited:

DanNCL

Established Member
Joined
17 Jul 2017
Messages
5,070
Location
County Durham
I’ve just been past the site of the accident. The damaged carriage is now upright, though one end remains suspended in the air by a crane. The carriage has come out remarkably unscathed considering it’s been resting on its side for three days!

There‘s some minor disruption on the adjacent metro line which Nexus have blamed on the recovery of the 802.
 

Attachments

  • 69C2AEDF-4E57-4AB5-ADE2-D8E8F78C8528.jpeg
    69C2AEDF-4E57-4AB5-ADE2-D8E8F78C8528.jpeg
    2.5 MB · Views: 683
  • F63A8983-DB1D-4CE2-8862-E0A1AEA8A15E.jpeg
    F63A8983-DB1D-4CE2-8862-E0A1AEA8A15E.jpeg
    2 MB · Views: 669

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
5,511
I’ve just been past the site of the accident. The damaged carriage is now upright, though one end remains suspended in the air by a crane. The carriage has come out remarkably unscathed considering it’s been resting on its side for three days!

There‘s some minor disruption on the adjacent metro line which Nexus have blamed on the recovery of the 802.
Some good pictures then Dan!
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
33,061
That rather puts to bed the theory that “they’ll have to be cut up on site because they’ll never get rail cranes anywhere near because of OHLE”. o_O
 

millemille

Member
Joined
28 Jul 2011
Messages
386
Temporary removal of the overhead wires in the yard, couple of Kirow's to lift the vehicle back upright, stick it on wheel skates and Robert's your brother's uncle.

Dangerous Dave would have that out before you knew it...

I’ve just been past the site of the accident. The damaged carriage is now upright, though one end remains suspended in the air by a crane. The carriage has come out remarkably unscathed considering it’s been resting on its side for three days!

There‘s some minor disruption on the adjacent metro line which Nexus have blamed on the recovery of the 802.

Is it bad form to quote oneself?
 

GB

Established Member
Joined
16 Nov 2008
Messages
6,468
Location
Somewhere
That rather puts to bed the theory that “they’ll have to be cut up on site because they’ll never get rail cranes anywhere near because of OHLE”. o_O

where has that theory and quote come from because it’s not from here. No one said it couldn’t be recovered, no one said it wouldn’t be recovered. What was said was that recovery would be expensive and that cutting it up was an option discussed at one stage.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
33,061
where has that theory and quote come from because it’s not from here. No one said it couldn’t be recovered, no one said it wouldn’t be recovered. What was said was that recovery would be expensive and that cutting it up was an option discussed at one stage.
It’s a composite of views expressed earlier, eg #64 and #66?
 

greyman42

Established Member
Joined
14 Aug 2017
Messages
5,285
A TPE set derailed. There were no movements allowed out of the depot but trains are now being allowed to leave via the North end.
I am not familiar with the layout at Heaton, but why could everything not leave via the north end in the first place?
 

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
5,511
I am not familiar with the layout at Heaton, but why could everything not leave via the north end in the first place?
The shunting and movements team (based at Heaton) were removed from duty, as would be normal when an incident occurs.
Until morning team started at 6am, nothing could move on the depot.
 

CBlue

Member
Joined
30 Mar 2020
Messages
860
Location
East Angular
The low speed shunt of a 800 into a HST it is noteworthy the 800 came off worse…
Not quite the whole story.

But HST, best thing ever, timeless, legendary, Mk3's, I hear you say.....sorry to burst the bubble.

It was pointed out repeatedly at the time that the lack of crumple zones in an HST cab compared to a 800 means that the 800 -appears- to have suffered more damage, all in the name of protecting the driver.

This is like those comments you read on occasion complaining about how modern cars appear to be "worse off" in crashes despite the survivability of the occupants being far higher than say, a HST-era car like a Ford Cortina - which likely would look better after a low speed shunt.

However I know which I'd rather be driving at speed in a crash, and it isn't the HST or Cortina both of which by modern standards don't held up well in front end collisons. A head on crash at 70mph in a Cortina would have it disintegrate around you, and all there is in the HST is a bit of fibreglass making up the cab.
 

DanNCL

Established Member
Joined
17 Jul 2017
Messages
5,070
Location
County Durham
Some good pictures then Dan!
Thank you!

That rather puts to bed the theory that “they’ll have to be cut up on site because they’ll never get rail cranes anywhere near because of OHLE”. o_O
where has that theory and quote come from because it’s not from here. No one said it couldn’t be recovered, no one said it wouldn’t be recovered. What was said was that recovery would be expensive and that cutting it up was an option discussed at one stage.
Such theories I think came from the assumption that cranes would have to arrive by road, which would have been virtually impossible at that location without dismantling a large chunk of the depot throat. Of course the use of rail cranes has meant that the dismantling required has been limited to a few short sections of OHLE.

It’s easy to forget that there’s such a thing as a rail crane these days, with them so rarely being seen!

The shunting and movements team (based at Heaton) were removed from duty, as would be normal when an incident occurs.
Until morning team started at 6am, nothing could move on the depot.
Just to add to this - the signal cabin at Heaton is quite a walk from the main depot building which is where the morning team will have signed on. Movements of course weren’t able to resume until the signal cabin was manned. The first arrival at Newcastle from Heaton was at 07:00.
 

Trisha

Member
Joined
21 Nov 2019
Messages
14
Location
Newcastle
The shunting and movements team (based at Heaton) were removed from duty, as would be normal when an incident occurs.
Until morning team started at 6am, nothing could move on the depot.
Not fully correct, the staff involved which would be the MDD and the Panel Operator also any other persons who might have been involved in the movement. The rest of the Movements team would be still allowed to continue with their duties.
 

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
5,511
Thank you!



Such theories I think came from the assumption that cranes would have to arrive by road, which would have been virtually impossible at that location without dismantling a large chunk of the depot throat. Of course the use of rail cranes has meant that the dismantling required has been limited to a few short sections of OHLE.

It’s easy to forget that there’s such a thing as a rail crane these days, with them so rarely being seen!


Just to add to this - the signal cabin at Heaton is quite a walk from the main depot building which is where the morning team will have signed on. Movements of course weren’t able to resume until the signal cabin was manned. The first arrival at Newcastle from Heaton was at 07:00.
Just to add about the first arrival at Newcastle from Heaton, they were taking upwards of 45 minutes to come off shed, as they had to go on to the apron road at very north of depot next to mainline, and then move slowly back through yard, this was also done on the GU engine as power was off.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Not fully correct, the staff involved which would be the MDD and the Panel Operator also any other persons who might have been involved in the movement. The rest of the Movements team would be still allowed to continue with their duties.
But with out the panel operator involved nothing was able to move.
So who ever was left on duty was unable to be in a position to assist trains to depart.
So, as I said, until the mornings team came on nothing moved on depot.
 

westcoaster

Established Member
Joined
4 Dec 2006
Messages
4,344
Location
DTOS A or B
And add to that the panel may have been quarantined until checked over/downloaded and points and buttons documented.
 

Efini92

Established Member
Joined
14 Dec 2016
Messages
2,002
Not quite the whole story.

But HST, best thing ever, timeless, legendary, Mk3's, I hear you say.....sorry to burst the bubble.

It was pointed out repeatedly at the time that the lack of crumple zones in an HST cab compared to a 800 means that the 800 -appears- to have suffered more damage, all in the name of protecting the driver.

This is like those comments you read on occasion complaining about how modern cars appear to be "worse off" in crashes despite the survivability of the occupants being far higher than say, a HST-era car like a Ford Cortina - which likely would look better after a low speed shunt.

However I know which I'd rather be driving at speed in a crash, and it isn't the HST or Cortina both of which by modern standards don't held up well in front end collisons. A head on crash at 70mph in a Cortina would have it disintegrate around you, and all there is in the HST is a bit of fibreglass making up the cab.
You only have to look at the remains of the power car from the Stonehaven accident to know which one you’d rather be in.
I get the nostalgia of HST’s but they’ve had their time.
 

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
5,511
Rear carriage now reportedly on wheel skates, wonder where that will get moved to?
Aycliffe a possibility? Or is there space for it to be taken out by road from Tyne Yard?
 

AndrewE

Established Member
Joined
9 Nov 2015
Messages
6,036
You only have to look at the remains of the power car from the Stonehaven accident to know which one you’d rather be in.
I get the nostalgia of HST’s but they’ve had their time.
Anyone else remember the depot prang when an HST power car wrecked a class 47 cab?
Granted, the cl 47 could be bashed back out into shape - or completely rebuilt - but ISTR the glass-fibre (?) HST was relatively undamaged.
A
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top