• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

New Reston Station - Progress & Updates

Status
Not open for further replies.

Class 170101

Established Member
Joined
1 Mar 2014
Messages
8,430
The platform is compliant - does not need a hump!
How can it be compliant a wheelcahir user can't just rock up and board without assistance which I thought was more preferable than having ramps which take longer to deploy and then remove, especially on a tight section of the ECML.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
25,344
Location
Bolton
How can it be compliant a wheelcahir user can't just rock up and board without assistance which I thought was more preferable than having ramps which take longer to deploy and then remove, especially on a tight section of the ECML.
Because it's a standard height platform. The platform cannot in general be higher than that because it would risk people having to step down into the train from the platform if it did. It may also be out of gauge.

The issue is that the height of the floors in 80x trains much, much too high. But of course that affects every platform in the whole country used by an 80x, not only Reston.

If a 755 stopped at that platform the floor would be at the same level. So the platform cannot have a hump.

However, I don't think there are any stations on the ECML where access is available without the use of a ramp. Even for a 378 I'm pretty sure you still need a ramp? Others may be able to confirm.

A 700 doesn't need a ramp at London St Pancras platforms A and B but they're allowed to be non-standard heights.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

but I understood that meant internally a slope up from the doorways rather than higher doorways
As gimmea50anyday notes, the floor height difference is contained within the step at the door, not at a ramp (except for walking through the corridor to or from the driving vehicles).
 
Last edited:

hexagon789

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Sep 2016
Messages
17,137
Location
Glasgow
As gimmea50anyday notes, the floor height difference is contained within the step at the door, not at a ramp (except for walking through the corridor to or from the driving vehicles).
I've been remembering the corridors to the gangways then
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
33,055
Because it's a standard height platform. The platform cannot in general be higher than that because it would risk people having to step down into the train from the platform if it did. It may also be out of gauge.
[…]
A 700 doesn't need a ramp at London St Pancras platforms A and B but they're allowed to be non-standard heights...
The level boarding interface with 700s in the Thameslink core is only at the centre of the train, where the wheelchair area doors are. It’s still a hump, but a properly installed one. The rest of the platform is lower.
 

takno

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2016
Messages
6,149
The level boarding interface with 700s in the Thameslink core is only at the centre of the train, where the wheelchair area doors are. It’s still a hump, but a properly installed one. The rest of the platform is lower.
This is true, although the main reason for that at at pancras is that other platforms that the trains stop out would not be able to have level boarding across their whole length. There's no point a wheelchair user getting themselves on at the end of the train and then finding they can't get themselves off at their destination.

More generally, those platforms are extremely straight with a very low through speed. The clearances for that are very different to the clearances required on a high speed line where most of the trains are going straight through
 

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
25,344
Location
Bolton
The level boarding interface with 700s in the Thameslink core is only at the centre of the train, where the wheelchair area doors are. It’s still a hump, but a properly installed one. The rest of the platform is lower.
Indeed. But it's still doubtful if even those could have been used if multiple different types of train needed to serve those platforms.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
33,055
Indeed. But it's still doubtful if even those could have been used if multiple different types of train needed to serve those platforms.
Did they actually wait and only install them once the various Electrostars had gone?
 

AY1975

Established Member
Joined
14 Dec 2016
Messages
1,988
I love the quote from the Leader of SBC. If only if it were that simple. :lol:





First train in more than half a century stops at Reston ahead of station's reopening​

Does anyone know the exact date and time of this working (I'm guessing it was Tuesday 22nd or the morning of Wednesday 23rd Feb) and which unit was involved (impossible to make it out in the photo)?
 

Baxenden Bank

Established Member
Joined
23 Oct 2013
Messages
4,310
Times are shown in Real Time Trains for services Sunday 15 May onwards. Services as previously discussed, plus a couple of Edinburgh - Berwick-upon-Tweed trips. You have to trick RTT to get it to reveal the details - use Reston Signal eg402 and eg403 then click on the individual journey and it brings up the calls at Reston [RSN].

No guarantee that this is the opening date though, could simply be data in the system for the upcoming timetable change and be amended at a later date.
 

railjock

Member
Joined
30 Jun 2012
Messages
373
Looking forward to taking a trip down there. Hopefully a nice pub in the village while I await the return train.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
33,055
Although more of a timetabling question, has the frequency of trains calling there been sorted out properly yet?

I do recall reading the East Coast 2022 timetable consultation that the section for Crosscountry mentioned that although they are happy to call at Reston, they would not be able to also call at Dunbar with the same train.

Should ICXC call all trains at Reston and leave Dunbar to ICEC/LNER being as Dunbar has always had direct London trains?
There’s no XC calls in the May timetable as far as RTT is showing. Looks as if the consultation has been ignored regarding that point. Wasn’t the intended TPE service yet to be decided when the consultation was published?
 

gimmea50anyday

Established Member
Joined
8 Jan 2013
Messages
3,456
Location
Back Cab
The TPE 802s have started announcing Reston as a station stop so need to be manually programmed to remove the stop from the journey setup in the TMS. I don’t think Reston was ever envisaged when Neil Rudd did the original PA recordings so I expect he was brought back in to the studio to record the new station announcement
 

InOban

Established Member
Joined
12 Mar 2017
Messages
4,398
That's certainly the nearest. Or you can take your life in your hands, cross the A1 and head towards the sea. Coldingham has two I think, and there's another down at the beach.
 

jopsuk

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2008
Messages
12,773
More generally, those platforms are extremely straight with a very low through speed. The clearances for that are very different to the clearances required on a high speed line where most of the trains are going straight through
This is drifting off topic, but the Thameslink platforms aren't all straight- the St Pancras ones are for much of their length but have a surprisingly sharp curve at the south end. Farringdon they're neither straight nor level! But the low speed speed part does apply (slab track too, I think, which helps)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top