Phil56
Member
Reducing the numbers means disproportionately reducing the proportion for the less well off.
It doesn't have to be done by reducing supply, i.e. making Unis smaller. It can be done by reducing demand, i.e. better "education" and guidance for school leavers as to the alternatives, better provision of alternatives (the current growth in apprenticeship schemes is a VERY good step in the right direction), and pressure on employers to find better ways of selecting candidates rather than a lazy tick box "degree or not" to reduce applicant numbers.
We need people to go to Uni for the right reasons, not just because they can't think of anything better, because their school have pushed them into it, because there's an unnecessary requirement from employers that even shop or call centre work "needs" a degree. People from less well off backgrounds and other groups showing historically low Uni attendance should still have the option to go to Uni if it will suit them, and be subsidised as necessary, but alternative options and a proper evaluation of the pros and cons needs to be massively improved.
Likewise, we need more options for school leavers to have the ability to go to Uni a few years later, or even in middle age, so they'd feel less pressure to go at 18 as they do now, for fear of not being in a position to go later in life. I'm sure lots of youngsters who crash and burn at Uni and either leave mid way or get a low degree classification would do a lot better if they could have instead gone later in life having been more mature, more wisdom from age, more experience in life generally.
I do wonder whether the whole point of going to Uni has become lost, and whether rather than it being for academic achievement and self improvement, it's now become simply somewhere for youngsters to learn basic life skills, such as standing on their own two feet, cooking/cleaning for themselves, etc - the kind of things that parents used to teach their kids!