• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Avanti West Coast cancellations

Status
Not open for further replies.

Palmyra.

On Moderation
Joined
23 Jul 2022
Messages
26
Location
London
Looks like today won’t be any better than yesterday
 

Attachments

  • 3737CA10-4842-4577-9DDB-0603C574E465.jpeg
    3737CA10-4842-4577-9DDB-0603C574E465.jpeg
    429.2 KB · Views: 221
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

D1537

Member
Joined
11 Jul 2019
Messages
1,027
Looks like today won’t be any better than yesterday
Not sure what the problem is there, all the Glasgow southbounds appear to be running (though the first two were 20 late, and none have got past Preston yet!)
 

Furrball

Member
Joined
9 May 2011
Messages
576
Not sure what the problem is there, all the Glasgow southbounds appear to be running (though the first two were 20 late, and none have got past Preston yet!)
Yeah, that queue looks pretty normal. Delayed departure plus passengers from cancelled TPE can get a queue to the door pretty easily
 
Joined
9 Dec 2012
Messages
729
I'm travelling to Cumbria on the 4th from London, judging by realtime trains data this last week on the trains I'm booked on, I'm in for a treat
 

Statto

Established Member
Joined
8 Feb 2011
Messages
3,552
Location
At home or at the pub
Barring major incidents such as the Lamington Viaduct closure in 2016, yesterday must have been the worst day ever for Glasgow/London train performance. Of the 14 trains booked to run, precisely one, 1M18 the 1740, departed Glasgow on time; The rest were either late or cancelled, and as 1M18 only ran as far as Preston, not one single train ran as booked and on time from Central to Euston.

One of the Glasgow trains (1S95) was late at Crewe, as Preston via West Midlands (1P95) was terminated short at Crewe, 1S95 should have gone through on the down fast, but was diverted to call at Crewe to pick up passengers from 9P95, 1S95 ended up 18 late because of it, even though it arrived at Crewe on time, i know this happened as i observed it on the Railcam site.
 
Last edited:

Glenn1969

Established Member
Joined
22 Jan 2019
Messages
1,983
Location
Halifax, Yorks
I'm booked on Avanti trains for 5 consecutive days either the 1113 or 1313 from Milton Keynes to New Street (Mon, Tues and Wed), International (Thursday) and Coventry (Friday) for access to the Commonwealth Games. What chance do I have of all these trains running

I'm supposed to be on LNWR on Saturday 30th. They are on strike but journey planners still have not been updated and the tickets that are in the post still haven't arrived in any case 12 days after they were booked. My Avanti alternatives are 0713 or the 0724 Additional put on for the games. But I can't rebook due to the lack of communication by LNWR about what is actually going on. Help !
 

Falcon1200

Established Member
Joined
14 Jun 2021
Messages
4,964
Location
Neilston, East Renfrewshire
So is anyone here who has been affected by Avanti cancellations (or even not ) going to write to their MP, Avanti CEO, the DFT, A and Minister for Transport (whatever title covers this nowadays) and complain / ask them what they are going to do about it?

I have this morning contacted my local MP regarding Avanti.
 

Watershed

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
26 Sep 2020
Messages
14,221
Location
UK
Every single TPE service from Glasgow Central is cancelled today
This is part of the "temporary timetable" in operation on Sundays on TPE. These cancellations would (for what little it's worth) have been visible from Thursday.
 

D1537

Member
Joined
11 Jul 2019
Messages
1,027
This is part of the "temporary timetable" in operation on Sundays on TPE. These cancellations would (for what little it's worth) have been visible from Thursday.
Though try finding that out using TPEs website!

Timetable page: https://timetables.tpexpress.co.uk/#/timetables/1131/Anglo-Scottish - nope
Today's alterations: https://www.tpexpress.co.uk/-/media/altered-timetables/tpecancelledservices240722.pdf - nope
JourneyCheck - https://www.journeycheck.com/tpexpress/ - nope
 

Peregrine 4903

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2019
Messages
1,501
Location
London
I'm booked on Avanti trains for 5 consecutive days either the 1113 or 1313 from Milton Keynes to New Street (Mon, Tues and Wed), International (Thursday) and Coventry (Friday) for access to the Commonwealth Games. What chance do I have of all these trains running

I'm supposed to be on LNWR on Saturday 30th. They are on strike but journey planners still have not been upda and the tickets that are in the post still haven't arrived in any case 12 days after they were booked. My Avanti alternatives are 0713 or the 0724 Additional put on for the games. But I can't rebook due to the lack of communication by LNWR about what is actually going on. Help !
As someone that uses Avanti regularly on weekdays, I find that weekdays are fine to be honest. I've had one cancellation on a weekday in the last 2 years for shortage of train crew.

You'll be fine on weekdays I'd say.
 

Bertie the bus

Established Member
Joined
15 Aug 2014
Messages
3,032
This is part of the "temporary timetable" in operation on Sundays on TPE. These cancellations would (for what little it's worth) have been visible from Thursday.
It is difficult to describe something with no services as a timetable. It's a blank sheet of paper.
 

Watershed

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
26 Sep 2020
Messages
14,221
Location
UK
It is difficult to describe something with no services as a timetable. It's a blank sheet of paper.
The West Coast route as a whole still has some services (Edinburgh-Carlisle and Lancaster-Manchester Airport). But yes, it's an extremely limited offering.
 

185

Established Member
Joined
29 Aug 2010
Messages
5,519
But with the DfT in charge of the purse-strings there is a limit to what they can do within their current funding.
i) FirstGroup
ii) Shareholder dividends ;)

That said, the DfT hired them, the DfT still keep them ruining running the contract.
 

Watershed

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
26 Sep 2020
Messages
14,221
Location
UK
i) FirstGroup
ii) Shareholder dividends ;)
No owning group is going to fund extra traincrew costs out of the goodness of their own hearts. The railway isn't a charity.
 

SCDR_WMR

Established Member
Joined
17 Dec 2017
Messages
1,978
I’d have thought it’d be sensible for someone (DfT or Commonwealth Games organisers) to enquire about getting WMT to run a couple of late night trains from Birmingham to Euston.

12 car 350s calling International, Coventry, Rugby, Milton Keynes. Be more reliable than Avanti.
The issue there would be getting Ops Team to sign off 12 car working at those stations (MKC has it already). Then having stop boards installed, and then staff briefed
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
105,084
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
I can't help thinking it's a pity that LNWR are no longer running an hourly London Euston - Birmingham - Liverpool service. At the moment, no-one can say that it couldn't run reliably, considering the utter shambles Avanti are providing at the moment.

It was an utter disaster and was slower than the change at Crewe. No thanks.
 

Agent_Squash

Established Member
Joined
22 Jul 2016
Messages
1,245
The issue there would be getting Ops Team to sign off 12 car working at those stations (MKC has it already). Then having stop boards installed, and then staff briefed
Can’t a special operational instruction go out to just say use the Pendo 11 boards? The railway needs some out the box thinking at times…
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
105,084
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
One of the problems I have with Premium Economy is that the only tickets valid in this section are Advance ones.

There is no "Premium Economy Return" (either Anytime or Off Peak) that would give you the flexibility of a choice of trains.

You can upgrade on board.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

What an arrogant & patronising comment to make !

Not at all. You pay for ONE seat. Half empty First Class is all very nice but there is no entitlement to it.

It seems almost universal that it is Seatfroggers complaining about the improved yield management SP has brought.
 

Clarence Yard

Established Member
Joined
18 Dec 2014
Messages
2,974
i) FirstGroup
ii) Shareholder dividends ;)

That said, the DfT hired them, the DfT still keep them ruining running the contract.

It wouldn’t matter if FG doubled their corporate profit, or shareholder dividends (quite a bit of which is derived from non DfT businesses anyway). Since 2020 all DfT franchised TOCs have each been on strict cost budget limits and the DfT have the say on what happens.

Staff establishment is one area they keep a close eye on. So if you want to ease out your train crew diagrams and recruit some more staff, you have to get their approval. If you want to increase the amount of training, you have to get their approval. If you want to alter your staff conditions and recruit, in order to do away with regular Rest day or overtime working, or bring Sunday into the working week, you have to get their approval. If you want to offer any kind of pay rise, you have to get their approval.

Irrespective of whose fault it originally was, March 2020 reset the dial. If you ask the DfT for extra resources and you don’t get them, they impose restrictions (such as COVID) which restrict your ability to train, or they start reducing your ability to recruit, train or cover the job through imposed budget cuts, it’s on them.

The DfT also have the say on your timetabled service offer and, despite the Treasury breathing down their neck, getting them to agree service reductions (because you can’t now resource the timetable) isn’t easy because it is a political “hard sell”. But here is where Avanti do have a lot to answer for because if you do get agreement to reduce the service and then you fail dismally to resource that service because of your own fault, that’s down to you, not the DfT and you have to face the consequences.
 

SCDR_WMR

Established Member
Joined
17 Dec 2017
Messages
1,978
Can’t a special operational instruction go out to just say use the Pendo 11 boards? The railway needs some out the box thinking at times…
Would think that is unlikely, but that's for Ops Standards at WMT to consider. The 12 car stations we use all have ground markings as well so ideally they (or cab marker posts) would possibly be required.

If an incident occurred due to not having the same working principles as currently used, it would not look good at all would it. Safety first as they say.

Also, not sure Cov/New St even work 12-car services. Northampton do, but would require training for other depots as Crewe do but not the route from Rugby to New St
 

David Stewart

Member
Joined
7 Oct 2017
Messages
10
Agree. I've typically had very few major issues on weekdays and in recent months I've tended to avoid weekends travelling on Avanti if at all possible.
Friday was dreadful, at least 4 of the first Glasgow to Euston were cancelled. We were in the 0852 Edb to Lancaster which picked up two trainloads at Carlisle and Oxenholme. We were travelling to the Isle of Man and should be able to catch the 1012 TPE but dare not on case it's cancelled. For the return journey I have a Megabus booking as contigency.
 

Hadders

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
27 Apr 2011
Messages
16,449
The issue there would be getting Ops Team to sign off 12 car working at those stations (MKC has it already). Then having stop boards installed, and then staff briefed
I’d mistakenly assumed that all the stations I mentioned were cleared for 12-car 350s. If they’re not then just run 8-car trains.

Opportunity for WMT here.
 

D1537

Member
Joined
11 Jul 2019
Messages
1,027
I’d mistakenly assumed that all the stations I mentioned were cleared for 12-car 350s. If they’re not then just run 8-car trains.

Opportunity for WMT here.
Even so, a pair of 350/2s has more seats than a 9-coach Pendolino, and only 50ish fewer than an 11.
 

mandub

Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
196
It wouldn’t matter if FG doubled their corporate profit, or shareholder dividends (quite a bit of which is derived from non DfT businesses anyway). Since 2020 all DfT franchised TOCs have each been on strict cost budget limits and the DfT have the say on what happens.

Staff establishment is one area they keep a close eye on. So if you want to ease out your train crew diagrams and recruit some more staff, you have to get their approval. If you want to increase the amount of training, you have to get their approval. If you want to alter your staff conditions and recruit, in order to do away with regular Rest day or overtime working, or bring Sunday into the working week, you have to get their approval. If you want to offer any kind of pay rise, you have to get their approval.

Irrespective of whose fault it originally was, March 2020 reset the dial. If you ask the DfT for extra resources and you don’t get them, they impose restrictions (such as COVID) which restrict your ability to train, or they start reducing your ability to recruit, train or cover the job through imposed budget cuts, it’s on them.

The DfT also have the say on your timetabled service offer and, despite the Treasury breathing down their neck, getting them to agree service reductions (because you can’t now resource the timetable) isn’t easy because it is a political “hard sell”. But here is where Avanti do have a lot to answer for because if you do get agreement to reduce the service and then you fail dismally to resource that service because of your own fault, that’s down to you, not the DfT and you have to face the consequences.

Thanks. Assuming this is all correct....

What is the DfT's (and ultimately the Treasury) intention for train services generally in these directly controlled TOC's?

Does anyone have any inside info on their overall strategic plan? What do they want to happen?

They obviously know some TOC's can't run their services & will end up as TPE and Avanti now are.

Surely it can't be as short sighted as just - control costs in the short/medium term and then see what happens to user demand.
 

Clarence Yard

Established Member
Joined
18 Dec 2014
Messages
2,974
Thanks. Assuming this is all correct....

What is the DfT's (and ultimately the Treasury) intention for train services generally in these directly controlled TOC's?

Does anyone have any inside info on their overall strategic plan? What do they want to happen?

They obviously know some TOC's can't run their services & will end up as TPE and Avanti now are.

Surely it can't be as short sighted as just - control costs in the short/medium term and then see what happens to user demand.

The original DfT plan was to re-instate all services after COVID and there are still some there (and RDG) that want that to happen. But the punters are not coming back quick enough and there looks to be some long term effects on certain aspects of passenger demand. But with an economy that is misfiring, no-one is quite sure.

The Treasury has got fed up with the “Jam Tomorrow” attitude of the DfT and the squeeze is on. The Treasury don’t like to see any increase in TOC costs, even if it covered by additional revenue so it’s all a bit difficult at the moment.

Frankly nobody knows where this is going to end up. There are some that are trying to work it all out and some have their own pet theories but it’s all a bit uncertain and meanwhile the railway is still losing money with the Treasury not willing to release additional funds.

I’m fairly sure that there are some at the Treasury who wouldn’t mind seeing the railway shrink so, to be fair to the DfT, they are trying to hold a line but it is an increasingly less credible one because some TOCs need to up their resource levels. By looking at TOCs individually, the DfT are missing industry savings opportunities.

If this was BR, immediate action would have been taken across the board and the 16 weeks budget outturn discussions would have been interesting as immediate savings would be required from budget holders, not only to save money but to fund others where needed. Targets would have been set with robust action plans to achieve them.

Basically, we have an organisation (the DfT) trying to carry out a role that it is completely unsuited for.
 

172101

Member
Joined
25 Jan 2021
Messages
237
Location
London
Looks like today won’t be any better than yesterday
The reason for this was the first train 1M05 had to be outstabled at GLC as there was no room at Polmadie (due to all the trains cancelled on Saturday) and the driver had to prepare the unit, instead of it coming in ECS and being prepared. This resulted in late loading and a late start. Then the second train 1M07 was only a 9 car set instead of the booked 11 car.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top