• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Rail firm to add 220 trains a week from December

Status
Not open for further replies.

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
41,789
Location
Yorks
Well we know they got rid of that to try and encourage people into HS1. :)

True - there would be less incentive for people to stump up the HS1 premium !

That said, wasn't this an ambition before the franchise system disappeared up its own behind ?

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Both are still in use - freight along there isn’t all routed via the platforms. Delayed services running fast still use the through lines at Paddock Wood & Headcorn.

That's good to know !
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

paul1609

Established Member
Joined
28 Jan 2006
Messages
7,992
Location
K
Both are still in use - freight along there isn’t all routed via the platforms. Delayed services running fast still use the through lines at Paddock Wood & Headcorn.
Dont think thats correct unless its happened in the last few weeks. Paddock Wood, The points at the country end of the up through were temporarily out of use with all traffic routed through the platform and had been for some months. I understood the down through had recently joined them. Headcorn is still in use.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
41,789
Location
Yorks
Now you mention it, the up fast through Paddock Wood did look a bit rusty last time I went through there.
 

Timmyd

Member
Joined
28 Jun 2014
Messages
202
Perhaps rush hour should be treated differently to pre-covid but I am of the opinion that for off-peak and weekend services at least, it would be a sensible target. Using the Penge East line as an example, aiming for 2tph to Blackfriars all the way through the peak probably isn’t reasonable, but aiming to restore the pre-covid turn-up-and-go service certainly is. As you said yourself travel
patterns have changed and we should be focusing on catering for leisure travellers
Why would you not want to maintain the Blackfriars services? They’re pretty well used now at least in the up direction especially as they have been reduced to 4 from 6 cars. Evenings less so due to the very poor hourly service and the very awkward connection in the down direction at Blackfriars which makes it easier for most people from Farringdon, City etc to take a Thameslink and change at Herne Hill.
 

PGAT

Established Member
Joined
13 Apr 2022
Messages
1,839
Location
Selhurst
Why would you not want to maintain the Blackfriars services? They’re pretty well used now at least in the up direction especially as they have been reduced to 4 from 6 cars. Evenings less so due to the very poor hourly service and the very awkward connection in the down direction at Blackfriars which makes it easier for most people from Farringdon, City etc to take a Thameslink and change at Herne Hill.
I havent used those peak services so I can’t really comment about any improvements regarding it. The reduction seemed to indicate they weren’t too well used
 

Timmyd

Member
Joined
28 Jun 2014
Messages
202
I havent used those peak services so I can’t really comment about any improvements regarding it. The reduction seemed to indicate they weren’t too well used
I use the up trains most days. Admittedly not crush loaded but busy enough and also play an important part in keeping things sensible on the Thameslink trains from Herne Hill, otherwise they’d be impossible to board if lots more passengers were changing there
 

Mikey C

Established Member
Joined
11 Feb 2013
Messages
7,608
Well SE saw heavy cuts in 2022 and many lines are still someway behind service levels in 2020 even after this modest increase. There's also no additional leasing of trains. It's using existing stock.

For example the Slade Green rounders mentioned used to run all day every day every 30 mins. Now it's about two in total in the rush hour. It's going up to about four in the rush hour. Still none throughout the majority of the day. The Vic services were every 15 mins as Metro routes serving densely populated areas. Now every 30 mins and will go back to pre-cut levels. Those aren't incredible frequencies.

Also the argument that it's well staffed is simply wrong. Staff shortages on the SouthEastern network have been huge in recent years. No staff often see on busy stations and mass ticket office closures have been the norm. Don't forget that's often in addition to DOO.

The Networkers are clapped out and internally worse than much of Northerns stock.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==


The long distance lines and areas of Kent get a lot better service and TLC than suburban routes in London and into Dartford.
Indeed. Crazy that at the same time as the Elizabeth Line created lots of extra traffic into Abbey Wood that the Southeastern services serving that station were cut.
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
18,805
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
Passenger numbers across the network may be approaching the numbers before 2020, but that doesn't mean the patterns of travel are the same as they were then. The move to working from home is very much here to stay, particularly for people who travel further to work. Incremental improvements in timetables are welcome but that should not be without a review that the right services are running.

I’m increasingly unconvinced that working from home is here to stay, much as some people might like to keep telling themselves that as a form of wishful thinking.

There’s someone who lives two doors up from here who was absolutely adamant that he’d never be returning to the office. Funny how last week I passed him on all five days walking to the station at 0700 in the morning! And he’s far from being an edge case.
 

paul1609

Established Member
Joined
28 Jan 2006
Messages
7,992
Location
K
I’m increasingly unconvinced that working from home is here to stay, much as some people might like to keep telling themselves that as a form of wishful thinking.

There’s someone who lives two doors up from here who was absolutely adamant that he’d never be returning to the office. Funny how last week I passed him on all five days walking to the station at 0700 in the morning! And he’s far from being an edge case.
I think whatever you call it the demand for long distance commuting to London in the southeast has demnished considerably. In Kent and East Sussex once you reach approximately an hour away from the London Terminals demand drops off a cliff. Many stations which previously had multi £ million in season tickets and car parking are now rural backwaters with tumbleweed blowing around the car parks.
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
9,493
Location
London
Let's not forget Southeastern had cut routes on the North Kent line just 18-24 months ago, so part of this is replacing these services.
 

JamesT

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2015
Messages
3,615
I’m increasingly unconvinced that working from home is here to stay, much as some people might like to keep telling themselves that as a form of wishful thinking.

There’s someone who lives two doors up from here who was absolutely adamant that he’d never be returning to the office. Funny how last week I passed him on all five days walking to the station at 0700 in the morning! And he’s far from being an edge case.
My employer definitely thinks it’s here to stay. They’re trying to reduce space usage so they can stop renting some buildings. There’s no suggestion of redundancies, so it has to be through people being in the office less often.
Purely anecdotally, the people I know that used to commute by train every day are now doing a week or two per month, or switching to a couple of days a week and aiming for off-peak where possible.
 

sp503

Member
Joined
12 Jul 2023
Messages
43
Location
Reading
My employer definitely thinks it’s here to stay. They’re trying to reduce space usage so they can stop renting some buildings. There’s no suggestion of redundancies, so it has to be through people being in the office less often.
Purely anecdotally, the people I know that used to commute by train every day are now doing a week or two per month, or switching to a couple of days a week and aiming for off-peak where possible.
May I just add that in addition to working from home reducing traffic demand,
COVID has also changed how businesses are done considerably. For example, while a regional manager used to visit the head office in London every now and then for some unimportant meeting, those are largely done online now. And so are regular meetings with clients. This kind of business travel changes not only the demand in commuter services but also in longer distance routes as well.
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
31,271
Location
Fenny Stratford

Bully for them... How come there is money to employ staff and lease rolling stock for a better service in the SE, when rail is almost unuseable in the North of England because of shockingly bad reliability resulting from staff and rolling stock shortages?
Especially when peak-time services are notoriously financially inefficent (for a provider) due to poor stock and staff utilisation.
sigh :( not everything in life is a conspiracy or a north/south attack line.

BTW - I have never found rail "almost unusable in the North of England", even with the staff engagement issues that we currently face but what would I know eh?
I’m increasingly unconvinced that working from home is here to stay, much as some people might like to keep telling themselves that as a form of wishful thinking.
I think we are looking at a hybrid approach. 2/3 days in the office, 2/3 days at home. ( Those office days will be Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday for many)
 

pokemonsuper9

Established Member
Joined
20 Dec 2022
Messages
2,794
Location
Greater Manchester
I’m increasingly unconvinced that working from home is here to stay, much as some people might like to keep telling themselves that as a form of wishful thinking.
Plenty of businesses I know of have moved to smaller offices that couldn't fit the entire workforce based there at the same time (e.g. 50 desks for 100 staff), and I don't think they'll go back.
 

Wyrleybart

Established Member
Joined
29 Mar 2020
Messages
2,017
Location
South Staffordshire
Explains the need for 170 drivers in the recent campaign which before this news I couldn't believe it was down to just retirements and general staff turnover.
There will need to be considerably more recruitments needed just as soon as the ASLEF pay claim is resolved satisfactorily. A swathe of more senior drivers will be retiring the service as soon as their arrears are paid
 

NSEWonderer

Established Member
Joined
5 Dec 2020
Messages
2,114
Location
London
There will need to be considerably more recruitments needed just as soon as the ASLEF pay claim is resolved satisfactorily. A swathe of more senior drivers will be retiring the service as soon as their arrears are paid
Indeed. Quite a few other TOCs too with outstanding pay deals will most likely see the same movement come a decent pay deal, assuming it's backdated sufficiently.
 

Krokodil

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2023
Messages
4,657
Location
Wales
220 trains a week is virtually nothing in the scheme of things
Indeed, it's some way fewer than the number of trains that a certain operator (beginning with 'N') cancelled on Sunday alone.

Staffing problems even down here today. I wonder why? :smile:

Six cancellations and two part-cancellations? So trivial, I'm amazed that the BBC found it newsworthy. They also found Chiltern, LNER and GWR's cancellations to be newsworthy. The N operator (with 250+ cancellations) didn't get a mention by the BBC. They must have been aware of it - given that Mediacity is in Manchester - so I'm concluding that "Northern cancellations on Sunday" comes under the same heading as "Pope is Catholic".

BTW - I have never found rail "almost unusable in the North of England", even with the staff engagement issues that we currently face but what would I know eh?
With your username one might presume that you're in the NE rather than NW, and therefore not affected by the Sunday issue. One station was left without a train for nearly five hours. If that doesn't qualify as "unusable" then I don't know what does.
 

Class15

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2021
Messages
3,202
Location
North London or Mildmay line
With your username one might presume that you're in the NE rather than NW, and therefore not affected by the Sunday issue. One station was left without a train for nearly five hours. If that doesn't qualify as "unusable" then I don't know what does.
May I please know which station this is? There are actually stations in Scotland which are not supposed to have much more of a service than that?
 

MikeWh

Established Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
15 Jun 2010
Messages
8,092
Location
Crayford
Explains the need for 170 drivers in the recent campaign which before this news I couldn't believe it was down to just retirements and general staff turnover.
The cuts in 2022 meant that Southeastern rarely had to cancel any trains when ASLEF worked to rule. They were only really affected on strike days.
 

theageofthetra

On Moderation
Joined
27 May 2012
Messages
3,565
Location
Beckenham
There will need to be considerably more recruitments needed just as soon as the ASLEF pay claim is resolved satisfactorily. A swathe of more senior drivers will be retiring the service as soon as their arrears are paid
Correct, plus loads leaving or have left to earn more money at TFL
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
31,271
Location
Fenny Stratford
With your username one might presume that you're in the NE rather than NW, and therefore not affected by the Sunday issue. One station was left without a train for nearly five hours. If that doesn't qualify as "unusable" then I don't know what does.
that is my point. The service is entirely usable in much of the north. There is clearly a harmonisation issue with terms and conditions leading to problems in one section of the northern franchise.
 

Krokodil

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2023
Messages
4,657
Location
Wales
that is my point. The service is entirely usable in much of the north. There is clearly a harmonisation issue with terms and conditions leading to problems in one section of the northern franchise.
"One section"? That makes it sound like just a couple of depots. Bit of an understated way to describe half of the operation.
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
31,271
Location
Fenny Stratford
"One section"? That makes it sound like just a couple of depots. Bit of an understated way to describe half of the operation.
whatever. The service is entirely usable in much of the "north". It is certainly usable in the best bit!

EDIT - it is clear that the Northern service in the north west DOESNT WORK. However, the north west does not equal the north nor is the entire train service in the "north" unusable. For instance, I am able to travel easily, almost every Sunday, from Leeds to Manchester. That seems quite Northern to me....................
 
Last edited:

Geogregor

Member
Joined
16 Sep 2016
Messages
350
Location
London
Perhaps rush hour should be treated differently to pre-covid but I am of the opinion that for off-peak and weekend services at least, it would be a sensible target. Using the Penge East line as an example, aiming for 2tph to Blackfriars all the way through the peak probably isn’t reasonable, but aiming to restore the pre-covid turn-up-and-go service certainly is. As you said yourself travel
patterns have changed and we should be focusing on catering for leisure travellers

Absolutely. 2tph frequency in densely populated inners suburbs of London was a joke, 4tph should have been restored a while ago. It was always more important than some peak trains to Blackfriars, especially in the new world of less pronounced peaks.

In fact I would do something about Sunday service. Services mid-day can be rammed, more than during the week. But that's a whole can of worms...
 

ScotGG

Established Member
Joined
3 Apr 2013
Messages
1,508
Why is the 'pre-Covid timetable' always seen as the aim? Passenger flows have changed for good, revenue has diminished, and a recast which actually reflects the new patterns of demand may give a better timetable than operated 'pre-Covid' .
We always hear some saying this yet TFL have got back to pre covid passenger journeys (and often above) on London Overground rail routes as they have maintained pre covid levels of service. Flows and revenue havn't changed for good. In fact TfL doing well with rail revenue from LO.

Meanwhile DaFT have insisted on cuts within London on TOCs with some routes having an axe taken to them and they're lagging way behind. Is it less demand or the cuts have made it not worth using? And thus road congestion keeps rising...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top