Well said!
I actually agree that FreightLocate is far better than Freightmaster when
it comes to 'one off' moves such as test trains, stock moves, railtours, etc,
because Freightmaster doesn't list such trains to begin with!
However, when it comes to 'everyday' freight movements, Freightmaster
is far more accurate because I continually check my timetables for unused/
dead/spare paths, and remove as many as possible so the Freightmaster
timetables reflect what actually runs.
Obviously this is a 'painting the Forth Bridge' type process,
as trains are continually starting/stopping/changing days,
but I pride myself that the Freightmaster timetables contain
less than 10% non-runners on average, while FreightLocate
timetables, because they are blindly generated from TPS files,
contain more than 50% non-runners in many parts of the country,
based on my experience with the 'demo' version of FreightLocate.
Now for enthusiasts who have a good working knowledge of freight
services to begin with, and/or are only interested in specific trains,
this may not be a problem, but for the casual enthusiast who just
wants to know what trains pass Water Orton/Carlisle/Didcot/Doncaster,
Freightmaster offers a far more 'user friendly' experience.
So in conclusion, even though I am obviously biased, I still think
that there is a market for both services, and whether one is better
than the other depends purely on how you intend to make use of the
information...
MARK