• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Grand Central apply for Newcastle - Brighton direct

FlyingPotato

Member
Joined
23 Mar 2023
Messages
331
Location
Always moving
I'm not sure why anyone would want to do that when you could do the same flight from a nearby airport with a connection. I could understand if you were driving as it could be cheaper but unless this service is £15 or so, there's absolutely no reason why you'd do it. It'll never be competitive, especially throwing a hotel room on top.
My flatmate took the train from the Northwest to Gatwick to fly to Armenia on the same day because it was overall cheaper and more convenient than the other options. Yes GC ain't serving the North West, but it's a significant distance away from London like the North East, but it just shows that people will travel from across the country to London airports like Gatwick to fly for a number of reasons
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
25,067
Location
Bolton
I'm not sure why anyone would want to do that when you could do the same flight from a nearby airport with a connection. I could understand if you were driving as it could be cheaper but unless this service is £15 or so, there's absolutely no reason why you'd do it. It'll never be competitive, especially throwing a hotel room on top.
I'm not sure this makes sense. The flight may be with an airline that doesn't offer connections? A seasonal route by a low cost carrier would easily fit this box, along with a lot of other possibilities. The person's origin may be convenient for a railway station on this route and not convenient for a nearer airport. Sometimes Gatwick Airport has direct air services which no other airport in Great Britain does. There may be no appropriate connecting flight that suits the travel times. A hotel stay may be preferable to something involving driving and parking as it would remove waking up early or risking driving while tired. And a hundred other possibilities. You yourself may not make any journeys that fall into these categories of course.

My flatmate took the train from the Northwest to Gatwick to fly to Armenia on the same day because it was overall cheaper and more convenient than the other options. Yes GC ain't serving the North West, but it's a significant distance away from London like the North East, but it just shows that people will travel from across the country to London airports like Gatwick to fly for a number of reasons
Indeed. I know someone who used Norse as they were the sole airline offering a decent-price economy ticket between Great Britain and the US East Coast on the week they wanted to travel, so they had to use rail to get between Manchester and Gatwick Airport as that's where they fly from. BA from Manchester with a connection at London Heathrow was obviously an option at four times the price, so obviously a night away and a rail ticket were still cost effective.
 
Last edited:

Iskra

Established Member
Joined
11 Jun 2014
Messages
9,084
Location
West Riding
I'm not sure why anyone would want to do that when you could do the same flight from a nearby airport with a connection. I could understand if you were driving as it could be cheaper but unless this service is £15 or so, there's absolutely no reason why you'd do it. It'll never be competitive, especially throwing a hotel room
Speaking from recent experience, I would never rely on a UK connecting flight into a long haul flight ever again. I would get the train the night before.

If you’ve spent a lot of money on a long haul holiday, what’s a a couple of hundred extra for train tickets and a hotel knowing you’re guaranteed to make your flight in the morning, rather than risking a connecting flight not turning up on the day and having to get a taxi to Heathrow (or Gatwick in this case) instead at significant cost…

- - -

And a separate example, I frequently drive to London Stansted from Yorkshire, because it’s the only airport in the UK to have a direct flight to the obscure bit of Italy I travel to frequently. There are lots of reasons why people use distant airports to their homes.
 

357

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2018
Messages
1,843
I'm not sure why anyone would want to do that when you could do the same flight from a nearby airport with a connection. I could understand if you were driving as it could be cheaper but unless this service is £15 or so, there's absolutely no reason why you'd do it. It'll never be competitive, especially throwing a hotel room on top.
I live in Leeds and regularly find myself flying from Luton as the flights going where I need to be are that much cheaper. Last week three of us saved over £100 each.
 

Snex

Member
Joined
20 Jun 2018
Messages
363
Speaking from recent experience, I would never rely on a UK connecting flight into a long haul flight ever again. I would get the train the night before.

If you’ve spent a lot of money on a long haul holiday, what’s a a couple of hundred extra for train tickets and a hotel knowing you’re guaranteed to make your flight in the morning, rather than risking a connecting flight not turning up on the day and having to get a taxi to Heathrow (or Gatwick in this case) instead at significant cost…

- - -

And a separate example, I frequently drive to London Stansted from Yorkshire, because it’s the only airport in the UK to have a direct flight to the obscure bit of Italy I travel to frequently. There are lots of reasons why people use distant airports to their homes.

Not saying there's no demand, at all, but I'd imagine most will be driving as it's just easier. The people using a train will be a miniscule and certainly not something which warrants direct services and if they do it'll be once or twice a year anyway.

I'm not sure which airline your using if they're not offering a different route to get to your destination they have a legal duty to do so, you certainly shouldn't be paying for a taxi. Continued below as I'll just be echoing.

I live in Leeds and regularly find myself flying from Luton as the flights going where I need to be are that much cheaper. Last week three of us saved over £100 each.

Aye no arguments about reductions but once you account for the train it'll be soon gone.

To be fair though I'd argue for better connections to both Luton and Stansted. They're both rather difficult to get to from Yorkshire and the North East without doubling back in London or dodgy connections as an understatement.

Could actually see some demand for them to be fair and the fares are a bargain from both that you'd save a fair bit.
 

Zomboid

Member
Joined
2 Apr 2025
Messages
533
Location
Oxford
o be fair though I'd argue for better connections to both Luton and Stansted
Isn't Stanstead just a change at Peterborough job? Maybe the connections don't line up well, but it's hardly complex, unless the calling pattern at Peterborough is unhelpful.

Luton is a different story though.
 

YorkRailFan

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2023
Messages
2,046
Location
York
I'm not sure why anyone would want to do that when you could do the same flight from a nearby airport with a connection. I could understand if you were driving as it could be cheaper but unless this service is £15 or so, there's absolutely no reason why you'd do it. It'll never be competitive, especially throwing a hotel room on top.
For the past few years now, I also travel from Yorkshire to London to get a flight. Its often cheaper and usually offers better connectivity. I also usually stay over due to my flight being very early. Unless your flying to popular leisure destinations In Europe, or Dubai and connecting onwards and NYC, then London offers far better connections.
 

43066

On Moderation
Joined
24 Nov 2019
Messages
11,638
Location
London
To be fair though I'd argue for better connections to both Luton and Stansted. They're both rather difficult to get to from Yorkshire and the North East without doubling back in London or dodgy connections as an understatement.

This isn’t true at all - EMR services from South Yorkshire can get you to Luton airport easily. Two changes but high frequencies and decent reliability.

Stansted is doable via one change at Leicester, or Peterborough if you’re coming from the north east via the ECML.
 

Snex

Member
Joined
20 Jun 2018
Messages
363
Isn't Stanstead just a change at Peterborough job? Maybe the connections don't line up well, but it's hardly complex, unless the calling pattern at Peterborough is unhelpful.

Luton is a different story though.

More the one train per hour really, quite risky - believe it's 20 minutes from North East and 50 minutes from Leeds though which is fine on a good day, but the railway isn't exactly the most reliable thing around.

For the past few years now, I also travel from Yorkshire to London to get a flight. Its often cheaper and usually offers better connectivity. I also usually stay over due to my flight being very early. Unless your flying to popular leisure destinations In Europe, or Dubai and connecting onwards and NYC, then London offers far better connections.

Yeah it's a valid point from Yorkshire, in hindsight, keep forgetting Leeds/Bradford doesn't really have the connections and by the time you went across to Manchester, you could be in London anyway. I'm thinking more from the North East where we've got a bit of choice with Heathrow, Paris, Frankfurt, Dublin, Amsterdam, Dubai etc. I know quite a few people head North though because of the school holidays being different times to get cheaper fares.

Mind anyone sane would be getting a train to Kings Cross, walk for 5 minutes and do Thameslink though rather than sitting for 6 hours, give or take, via Birmingham.
 

A S Leib

Established Member
Joined
9 Sep 2018
Messages
2,061
Isn't Stanstead just a change at Peterborough job? Maybe the connections don't line up well, but it's hardly complex, unless the calling pattern at Peterborough is unhelpful.

Luton is a different story though.
Admittedly I'd guess the DART's more pleasant, but once the third hourly King's Cross to Newcastle service is introduced and all Lumo services are calling at Stevenage, I'd guess improving bus services there would suffice in the short term (whether Universal would mean much more north England to Bedford / Luton demand is already in other threads).
 

cav1975

Member
Joined
24 Sep 2010
Messages
403
While it is good to see Simon Calder supporting this initiative, sadly I don't think that he is a serious journalist. This quote from his first paragraph "The train, though, is actually Grand Central – the “open access” division of Arriva, ultimately owned by German Railways." is very out of date. German railways sold Arriva to I Squared Capital back in June 2024
 

Class15

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2021
Messages
3,096
Location
North London or Mildmay line
While it is good to see Simon Calder supporting this initiative, sadly I don't think that he is a serious journalist. This quote from his first paragraph "The train, though, is actually Grand Central – the “open access” division of Arriva, ultimately owned by German Railways." is very out of date. German railways sold Arriva to I Squared Capital back in June 2024
Oh come on. It’s a very minor error in the grand scheme of things. ‘Very out of date’ is a bit too much, as well, it’s less than a year!
 

YorkRailFan

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2023
Messages
2,046
Location
York
Mind anyone sane would be getting a train to Kings Cross, walk for 5 minutes and do Thameslink though rather than sitting for 6 hours, give or take, via Birmingham.
Agree, if this service is approved, I'll more than likely continue to go via London as its quicker and offers better flexibility. I'm sure many others up here will also do the same.
 

Zomboid

Member
Joined
2 Apr 2025
Messages
533
Location
Oxford
York to Gatwick (and similar) isn't going to be a flow that makes or breaks this proposal. I'm sure a handful of people will do it, but I suspect the general York to Gatwick passenger numbers are pretty low and unlikely to increase.
 

cle

Established Member
Joined
17 Nov 2010
Messages
4,652
While it is good to see Simon Calder supporting this initiative, sadly I don't think that he is a serious journalist. This quote from his first paragraph "The train, though, is actually Grand Central – the “open access” division of Arriva, ultimately owned by German Railways." is very out of date. German railways sold Arriva to I Squared Capital back in June 2024
He's a very well respected travel journalist, and a big supporter of rail - are you doubting his credibility and body of work / reputation because of this Arriva semantic thing?

Agree, if this service is approved, I'll more than likely continue to go via London as its quicker and offers better flexibility. I'm sure many others up here will also do the same.
I don't think this is useful beyond Birmingham (re Gatwick/Brighton at least). And MML / Thameslink means the London route is far easier - also for ECML. It's best leaning more west / north west.

But Newcastle/York to Reading/Oxford is a thing.
 
Last edited:

Snex

Member
Joined
20 Jun 2018
Messages
363
But Newcastle/York to Reading is a thing.

It'd be interesting to see how much traffic there is for that to be fair, it's nearly an 40 minutes quicker heading via London. I understand that involves changing trains, but I'd rather change trains than be stuck on an overcrowded Voyager for hours and Reading, no offence to the place, isn't exactly a Tourist hot spot.
 

Zomboid

Member
Joined
2 Apr 2025
Messages
533
Location
Oxford
Reading is a big employment/ business hub, and Oxford is tourist central, plus the academia and businesses.

In fact both Oxford and York are historic tourist places, and a direct service between them will probably attract quite a few tourists.
 

The Ham

Established Member
Joined
6 Jul 2012
Messages
11,018
I'm not sure which airline your using if they're not offering a different route to get to your destination they have a legal duty to do so, you certainly shouldn't be paying for a taxi. Continued below as I'll just be echoing.

As I understand it, after two hours you'll get some refreshments, after three hours that's when more protections kick in and over 5 hours (on connecting flights) is when they have to get you back to your original departure point.

That's of course only if extraordinary circumstances did not cause the delay.

Planning for a five hour delay (especially for a 8am flight) is basically the night before.

That's before you consider that a delay of one hour to your arrival time by train would mean that you could claim the value of the ticket back.
 

cle

Established Member
Joined
17 Nov 2010
Messages
4,652
It'd be interesting to see how much traffic there is for that to be fair, it's nearly an 40 minutes quicker heading via London. I understand that involves changing trains, but I'd rather change trains than be stuck on an overcrowded Voyager for hours and Reading, no offence to the place, isn't exactly a Tourist hot spot.
I’m not a huge Reading fan - but it’s far more important than York or Newcastle in rail usage terms. Probably economically too.

And the hinterland does have some much nicer spots. But it is not a tourist hotspot.

Whereas Oxford is - but is also a big business and commuting draw too.
 

YorkRailFan

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2023
Messages
2,046
Location
York
York to Gatwick (and similar) isn't going to be a flow that makes or breaks this proposal. I'm sure a handful of people will do it, but I suspect the general York to Gatwick passenger numbers are pretty low and unlikely to increase.
I also doubt that this service will take passengers away from the current via London flow.
I’m not a huge Reading fan - but it’s far more important than York or Newcastle in rail usage terms. Probably economically too.

And the hinterland does have some much nicer spots. But it is not a tourist hotspot.

Whereas Oxford is - but is also a big business and commuting draw too.
I used to get the XC Newcastle-Reading service through to Reading, it was very convenient as I could change to GWR services heading over to Wiltshire. Since lockdown, I've gone via London as a result of XC lowering the frequency. There is absolutely demand for the Newcastle-Reading service, unfortunately, XC just don't have the capacity to operate an hourly service at the moment.
 

Top