• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Collision with tractor near Leominster (22/05/25)

Status
Not open for further replies.

saismee

Member
Joined
20 Oct 2023
Messages
322
Location
UK
As opposed to the even heavier loco at the other end?!
And the images don't show the other end. The MK4s and their couplers could have some damage too, so the whole set will likely need to be inspected and repaired. Even if the damage isn't visible, it could be structural. With the heavy locomotive trailing, I'm worried that could have caused some extra damage.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

sd0733

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2012
Messages
4,617
I assume the line will be closed until tomorrow?
Certainly until close of service tonight but disruption into tomorrow seems highly likely.

Everyone is now evacuated from the scene and plans are in place to take the striken rake to Crewe ETD.
 

transportphoto

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Quizmaster
Joined
21 Jan 2010
Messages
5,187
Statements from British Transport Police on X:

BTP timed at 13:56 today said:
This morning a train struck a tractor trailer on a crossing near Leominster,

Our officers are on scene with West Mercia Police, fire and paramedics.

Fortunately there have been no serious injuries.

Enquiries are ongoing into the circumstances leading up to the incident.
BTP timed 16:31 today said:
Update.

Following medical assessments two people were treated for injuries that are not considered to be serious.

A 32-year-old man from Bromyard has been arrested on suspicion of endangering safety on the railway.

The investigation is ongoing.
 

Mcr Warrior

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Jan 2009
Messages
14,762
Where's the actual location? Presumably it's one of the various user-worked farm crossings on the stretch of line nearing Leominster? The one at Nordan Farm, perhaps, which is about two miles before Leominster for a South Wales bound train?

P.S. Edited for typo.
 
Last edited:

Strathclyder

Established Member
Joined
12 Jun 2013
Messages
3,452
Location
Clydebank
A real relief that no serious injuries have resulted from this incident.

Probably a good thing it was a DVT they are designed to be strong and heavy for use at high speed
On balance, the loco at the other end would be preferable to a comparatively lightweight DVT in situations like this. The outcome/accident severity depends on multiple factors, not least of which being the train's speed, the size of the object fouling the line, the amount of reaction time the driver has - it's almost always mere seconds - to apply full emergency braking, the speed at point of impact and whether or not any debris gets caught under the bogies and is able to cause a derailment.

The location of said potential derailment, the presence of pointwork able to deflect a train with a derailed bogie and cause the train to topple over and whether or not there's a train approaching from the other direction which is able to stop in time should a crash occur ahead of it are also factors to take into account. Further to the first point, while their root causes were completely different, both the Eschede & Granville disasters in Germany & Australia respectively were made so much worse by derailed carriages striking overbridge supports, bringing the deck down on and crushing carriages.

Since a Mk4 DVT was involved in this incident and with all the above factors in mind, it feels pertinent to mention Great Heck and the fate of 82221. After hitting Gary Hart's car, 221 was derailed sufficently to be deflected by pointwork leading into a nearby goods yard right into the path of 66521 hauling a loaded coal train coming the other way. The closing speed between the two trains (142mph if I recall correctly) and the resulting forces/energy of the collision were enough to utterly obliterate the DVT, severely damage the 66 and kill both drivers instantly. The likelihood of the 91 being derailed in the collision with the car had it been leading the train that morning would've been markedly reduced simply because the 91 is twice as heavy as a DVT - 85 tonnes vs. 43 tonnes - but not eliminated completely. That much I can say without veering headlong into speculative territory.
 
Last edited:

Anonymous10

Established Member
Joined
19 Dec 2019
Messages
2,380
Location
wales
Counts on the condition of 82229 and if the spare one is okay! HD08 is on the horizon so that DVT isn't usable either.


Yikes! Hope the driver is okay and all passengers who have had reported injuries recover well. That DVT does look to have negated quite a lot of potential damage, unsure how severe the damage to the DVT is from that angle but by the looks of it the rest of the set is still in good condition.
I didn't think there was any news on HD08.
 

Pete_uk

Established Member
Joined
28 Jan 2017
Messages
1,381
Location
Stroud, Glos
Image shows the DVT with its nose deep in a tall trailer.


Lucky it didn't go fully under or that DVT is coming off the rails.
 

Attachments

  • 20250522_174425.jpg
    20250522_174425.jpg
    75.9 KB · Views: 743
Joined
10 Feb 2016
Messages
115
Image shows the DVT with its nose deep in a tall trailer.


Lucky it didn't go fully under or that DVT is coming off the rails.

Looks like it was hauling silage as there's some still in it and the adjacent field has been cut. I can imagine that at this time of the year there would be extremely frequent crossings of the line as those trailers fill up very quickly. Must be a significant challenge for the signaller trying to keep track of all the movements. I'm assuming the crossing doesn't have the little red and green lights?
 

Sir Felix Pole

Established Member
Joined
21 Oct 2012
Messages
1,379
Location
Wilmslow
There seems to be an unusually high incidence on this line of this type of event - is it just the sheer number of crossings, inadequate signalling / protection, poor sighting or particularly impatient farmers? Or all four?
 

Jez

Established Member
Joined
22 Jan 2011
Messages
1,812
Location
Neath
Thank goodness there were not more people injured and no serious injuries. Thats the main thing.

The MK4's often get put to bed in the event of disruption especially when its unplanned. i.e an accident or bad weather. I imagine if they ran them Manchester-Shrews and Hereford to Cardiff there is the risk they could up in the wrong place or train crew who dont sign them could be allocated. Hopefully the 197s can cope until normal service resumes.
 

Mcr Warrior

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Jan 2009
Messages
14,762
Nordan Farm crossing near Leominster seems to be a private user worked crossing with telephone, gate and stop notices. Lots of trains on this section of line at line speeds of up to 90 m.p.h.
 

Welshguy1048

Member
Joined
6 Apr 2023
Messages
990
Location
Prestatyn

saismee

Member
Joined
20 Oct 2023
Messages
322
Location
UK
It now says on the the BBC news story - that a 32 year old man from Bromyard has been arrested of endangering safety on the railway
On suspicion* the actual cause is still unknown (certainly not a topic that should be speculated here), and the farmer could well be innocent.
 

SuperS16v

Member
Joined
14 Jul 2022
Messages
262
Location
England
Must be a significant challenge for the signaller trying to keep track of all the movements. I'm assuming the crossing doesn't have the little red and green lights?

User work crossings have certain rules to keep the railway flowing safely.

Anything that takes longer than 3 minutes to cross or is long, low, slow such as a vehicle with a trailer requires signal protection. The signaller then MUST have a call back once the person has crossed the line before they clear the signals.

The issue with this time of year is the crossings are constantly used by farmers who are under alot of time pressure to get things down. Unfortunately, there are those who do not call and cross themselves without calling the signaller.

The reason for the collision is probably;

1. Signaller has not provided signal protection and given farmer permission to cross or cleared the protection early without the call back.
2. Driver has passed the protecting signal at danger
3. Farmer has crossed without permission.

Based on the news article it is most likely scenario 3.
 

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
8,170
Location
West Wiltshire
There is a short drone video, confusingly the second half appears to be a repeat with left-right transposed (which makes it look like it was running wrong line)

 

Iddybiddy05

Member
Joined
21 Jan 2025
Messages
28
Location
South wales
User work crossings have certain rules to keep the railway flowing safely.

Anything that takes longer than 3 minutes to cross or is long, low, slow such as a vehicle with a trailer requires signal protection. The signaller then MUST have a call back once the person has crossed the line before they clear the signals.

The issue with this time of year is the crossings are constantly used by farmers who are under alot of time pressure to get things down. Unfortunately, there are those who do not call and cross themselves without calling the signaller.

The reason for the collision is probably;

1. Signaller has not provided signal protection and given farmer permission to cross or cleared the protection early without the call back.
2. Driver has passed the protecting signal at danger
3. Farmer has crossed without permission.

Based on the news article it is most likely scenario 3.

Wales and Borders route mandates ALL crossing have a call back and signal protection.
 

contrex

Member
Joined
19 May 2009
Messages
1,164
Location
St Werburghs, Bristol
both the Eschede & Granville disasters in Germany & Australia respectively were made so much worse by derailed carriages striking overbridge supports, bringing the deck down on and crushing carriages.
Not forgetting Lewisham in 1957, when Battle of Britain class 34066 ran into an emu and its tender derailed and brought down a bridge onto two coaches of its train, crushing them.
 

eisenach

Member
Joined
6 Feb 2014
Messages
176
Location
Leominster
This is not far from Leominster; about 2 miles according to OS. The train would already have been slowing as it was due to call at Leominster. If it had been a non-caller, the results don't bear thinking about.
 

WirralLine

Member
Joined
4 Jun 2024
Messages
327
Location
Wirral
According to an internal source a specialist crane is required to remove the trailer and isn't expected until tomorrow morning at the earliest.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top