• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Manchester Metrolink (Non speculative discussion)

duffield

Established Member
Joined
31 Jul 2013
Messages
2,313
Location
East Midlands
While appreciating that they are dealing with very different traffic volumes from central Manchester, the Kirnitschtalbahn and several other continental tramways would beg to differ!
I'm talking about trams and other road vehicles literally flowing in opposite directions in the same lane on the same road at the same time. I'm finding it difficult to understand how that is possible in any country. If you're talking about very short light controlled sections where opposite flows cross then I can understand that though.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

pokemonsuper9

Established Member
Joined
20 Dec 2022
Messages
2,785
Location
Greater Manchester
Apart from the work site issues, is the closed section (not just the bit actually being worked on) entirely segregated? If some of it is mixed with road traffic, you can't have trams going against the flow without road closures, even if the tram infrastructure technically allows it.

I haven't used the Manchester trams enough to remember if this is an issue or not.
There's none of that in the city centre, but there is on the Manchester Airport, Eccles, Trafford Centre, and Ashton lines.
 

toms

Member
Joined
14 Aug 2024
Messages
104
Location
Manchester
The tram signals and the loops that trigger the traffic signals are positioned according to the directions the trams are expected to run, so won't work for wrong direction moves unless they have been designed in.
I think you meant to quote a post further up lol
 

The exile

Established Member
Joined
31 Mar 2010
Messages
5,048
Location
Somerset
I'm talking about trams and other road vehicles literally flowing in opposite directions in the same lane on the same road at the same time. I'm finding it difficult to understand how that is possible in any country. If you're talking about very short light controlled sections where opposite flows cross then I can understand that though.
Believe it or not, so am I. Normal road vehicles just have to take avoiding action. The difference is in the traffic volumes, of course.
 

507 001

Established Member
Joined
3 Dec 2008
Messages
2,057
Location
Huyton
Was it not possible to have some form of single-line working to maintain a skeleton service?

If you want the work to take twice as long then yes, I guess you could.

There's none of that in the city centre, but there is on the Manchester Airport, Eccles, Trafford Centre, and Ashton lines.

Yes there is, Mosley Street inbound and most of 2CC.
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
26,818
Location
Nottingham
Believe it or not, so am I. Normal road vehicles just have to take avoiding action. The difference is in the traffic volumes, of course.
Yeah that’s never happening here :lol:


*at least, not intentionally…
Where the Blackpool trams duck temporarily inland past the Metropole Hotel (just north of North Pier) they now have a reservation for both tracks on the western half of the road. But I recall back in the 80s these tracks were where they are now (at least approximately) but the whole road was accessible to other traffic with little or nothing in the way of lines to direct it round the trams.
 

cool110

Member
Joined
12 Dec 2014
Messages
680
Location
Preston
But I recall back in the 80s these tracks were where they are now (at least approximately) but the whole road was accessible to other traffic with little or nothing in the way of lines to direct it round the trams.
That lasted all the way up until the introduction of the Flexity fleet, you can even see it on street view if you set it back to 2009. That one did actually have directly oncoming traffic, since the southbound track ran through the northbound right turning lane for Springfield Road.


Screenshot From 2025-05-30 20-48-38.png
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
26,818
Location
Nottingham
That lasted all the way up until the introduction of the Flexity fleet, you can even see it on street view if you set it back to 2009. That one did actually have directly oncoming traffic, since the southbound track ran through the northbound right turning lane for Springfield Road.


View attachment 181032
Thanks for that. I've a feeling back in 1983 when I first visited there wasn't even that sort of road marking.
 

jfollows

Established Member
Joined
26 Feb 2011
Messages
8,078
Location
Wilmslow
Greater Manchester’s £2.5 billion funding boost to unlock UK’s first fully integrated, zero-emission public transport network

Looks like Metrolink will be expanding beyond its current 99 stop network - assume they’ll be making use of what is currently the East Lancs Railway?
No chance. Additional stops on the Bury line.
 

TT-ONR-NRN

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
11,720
Location
Salford Quays, Manchester
No chance. Additional stops on the Bury line.
To connect Bury with Rochdale, Oldham and Heywood using tram trains? You sure about that?
 

duffield

Established Member
Joined
31 Jul 2013
Messages
2,313
Location
East Midlands

Mcr Warrior

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Jan 2009
Messages
14,936
Was wondering if the locos and various coaching stock on the East Lancs Railway might be having a canary yellow makeover?!
 

sefyllian

Member
Joined
14 Jan 2013
Messages
112
MEN has more details including confirmation of tram-trains, extension to Stockport, and the locations of the new stations:

The government announcement paves the way for Metrolink trams to FINALLY run to Stockport town centre after years of campaigning, as well the purchasing of 1,000 new electric Bee Network buses.

It also includes three stops on existing tram lines - in Manchester, Bury and Oldham. It is understood they will be Sandhills in north Manchester; Elton Reservoir in Bury; and Cop Road in Oldham.

Plans for new city centre and Leigh interchanges are also being worked up. And tram-trains will soon be on their way to parts of the region, travelling along Metrolink lines AND and rail tracks.

The new tram stop in Sandhills will form part of Manchester’s £3.8bn Victoria North project, a ‘new town’ of 15,000 homes that will be built across 155 hectares from Angel Meadow in the city centre to Collyhurst in north Manchester.

It takes its name from the Sandhills park and former quarry, and would sit between Victoria and Queens Road stations, one of the longest gaps between Metrolink halts.

A similar line of thinking is employed for the new Elton Reservoir stop, falling between Radcliffe and Bury.

A new station on Cop Road, in Oldham, would be built between the Derker station and Shaw and Crompton stop, and like Elton Reservoir is identified as a priority in Andy Burnham’s controversial Places for Everyone plan with 1,450 homes eyed for the location.

Tram-trains are also also set to come to Oldham, as TfGM added it will roll-out the hybrid services to the borough along with Rochdale, Heywood, and Bury. The tech sees services run on traditional tramlines for some parts of the network, but on railway lines using batteries for others.
 

TheSmiths82

Member
Joined
29 Jun 2023
Messages
432
Location
Manchester
According to Place North West the Stockport extension will be from East Didsbury which is by far the most logical and probably useful route, but does anybody know the exact cuttings since most of the original line has been built on. Obviously running down Didsbury Road is not practical.
 

TheSmiths82

Member
Joined
29 Jun 2023
Messages
432
Location
Manchester
Too narrow / busy / congested?
Yep and too hilly, I am not sure the hills are an issue as such though but I have known buses to sometimes struggle down there. I always thought Manchester Road in Cheadle would be a good route, then down Stockport Road via Cheadle Health and Edgeley. It would give Cheadle Village a much improved transport boost too but I think that would be far too costly and the journey may be too slow compared to following a path similar to the original Didsbury to Stockport line.
 

Ethano92

Member
Joined
26 Jun 2017
Messages
451
Location
London
According to Place North West the Stockport extension will be from East Didsbury which is by far the most logical and probably useful route, but does anybody know the exact cuttings since most of the original line has been built on. Obviously running down Didsbury Road is not practical.
I remember seeing a map that showed it would follow the old rail alignment as far as Heaton Mersey, cross the river close to where the M60 does and skirt around the north of Edgely to terminate along the bus interchange. I’m not sure if that was an official map or an enthusiasts suggestion but I would assume the latter.
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
18,755
I'm a little confused by this tram train scheme.

What route is it taking?
Is it Bury into Manchester, then along the railway to Rochdale and then tram to Oldham?

Or is it using the ELR, in which case won't they end up in a prolonged fight to seize the ELR alignment?
I can't see electrification of the heritage line without taking control of it, and I can't see diesel tram trains being compatible with the zero carbon stuff scattered through the rest of the proposal

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

According to Place North West the Stockport extension will be from East Didsbury which is by far the most logical and probably useful route, but does anybody know the exact cuttings since most of the original line has been built on. Obviously running down Didsbury Road is not practical.
I've tried to game this out in the past.
Best I came up with was running down to the banks of the Mersey
 

AlastairFraser

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2018
Messages
3,461
Yep and too hilly, I am not sure the hills are an issue as such though but I have known buses to sometimes struggle down there. I always thought Manchester Road in Cheadle would be a good route, then down Stockport Road via Cheadle Health and Edgeley. It would give Cheadle Village a much improved transport boost too but I think that would be far too costly and the journey may be too slow compared to following a path similar to the original Didsbury to Stockport line.
I think it will be mostly the old alignment as far as Heaton Mersey (as another poster above suggested).
TfGM have a 2040 strategy map for Metrolink somewhere and Cheadle Hulme/Cheadle are connected to Hazel Grove using the current freight only branch towards Northenden Junction in part.
That will provide the major east west links across the south of Stockport metropolitan borough.
 

jfollows

Established Member
Joined
26 Feb 2011
Messages
8,078
Location
Wilmslow
I'm a little confused by this tram train scheme.

What route is it taking?
It is Bury into Manchester, then along the railway to Rochdale and then tram to Oldham?

Or is it using the ELR, in which case won't they end up in a prolonged fight to seize the ELR alignment?
I can't see electrification of the heritage line without taking control of it, and I can't see diesel tram trains being compatible with the zero carbon stuff scattered through the rest of the proposal
I got confused also, it’ll be along the freight-only line Bury-Castleton through Heywood, partly used by the ELR these days. Maybe the formation is wide enough for the two to coexist? Plus apparently only Oldham-Heywood ‘initially’ anyway.
 
Last edited:

duffield

Established Member
Joined
31 Jul 2013
Messages
2,313
Location
East Midlands
I got confused also, it’ll be along the freight-only line Bury-Castleton through Heywood, partly used by the ELR these days. Maybe the formation is wide enough for the two to coexist? Plus apparently only Oldham-Heywood ‘initially’ anyway.
Just going as far as Heywood they could potentially share the station with the ELR. The single platform is currently 225m approx (10 x MK1 coaches + loco!), with even some scope to extend so I'm sure you could convert the south-east end to a tram stop, shorten the ELR run-round loop and have them co-exist. OHLE probably wouldn't be an issue since I'd expect the new tram-trains to be BEMUs.

Getting beyond Heywood to run the tram-trains to Bury Interchange it gets trickier, even with just a single track for the tram-train.
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
18,755
Just going as far as Heywood they could potentially share the station with the ELR. The single platform is currently 225m approx (10 x MK1 coaches + loco!), with even some scope to extend so I'm sure you could convert the south-east end to a tram stop, shorten the ELR run-round loop and have them co-exist. OHLE probably wouldn't be an issue since I'd expect the new tram-trains to be BEMUs.

Getting beyond Heywood to run the tram-trains to Bury Interchange it gets trickier, even with just a single track for the tram-train.
I think the only way it works is if they build a single tram platform on the line into the ELR Bury station where it crosses the current tram route.

It is just about close enough for it to be called the same station.
I can't imagine its going to be a particularly high intensity, useful, service.
 

Top