• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Stopgap options to cover for delays to introduction of Class 810 for EMR?

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
12,248
Just think how much of this could have been avoided if realistic timescales had been given right from the start..
Would Hitachi have won the order if they had given realistic timescales?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Failed Unit

Established Member
Joined
26 Jan 2009
Messages
9,269
Location
Central Belt
Would Hitachi have won the order if they had given realistic timescales?
Probably not. EMRs ask was very off the shelf. I suspect they may be regretting not going for a 110mph train. Although had the whole line got electrified i suspect we would have a better conclusion. With how tight money is the passengers may not think so as it would probably be refurbished 350/2.
 

43074

Established Member
Joined
10 Oct 2012
Messages
2,102
Probably not. EMRs ask was very off the shelf. I suspect they may be regretting not going for a 110mph train. Although had the whole line got electrified i suspect we would have a better conclusion.
I don't see why they would have any regrets, running at 110mph instead of 120/125mph south of Bedford costs around 3 minutes. From a commercial point of view that would mean extending the journey time on all of their biggest flows (i.e. London - Nottingham, Leicester and Sheffield) which doesn't make any sense.

There's no indication that the delay to the 810s is because they were specified for 125mph, there are lots of other factors at play e.g. quality control issues and getting a training agreement with the unions.
 

Aspen90

Member
Joined
12 Sep 2018
Messages
212
Location
Rugby
There’s no way we can be any slower - the timings are so tight with the Thameslinks. If I leave STP 1 or 2 late I’m stuck behind the stopper or if I’ve an engine out and halfway to Bedford and delayed they’ll stick it on the fast in front of me and I’m stuffed for keeping time to the north then!
 

Energy

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2018
Messages
4,987
Seems most likely to me that EMR will borrow a few class 170s from other operators, or use the class 221s in storage, with XC driver trainers being quickly sent across.
 

Wyrleybart

Established Member
Joined
29 Mar 2020
Messages
2,023
Location
South Staffordshire
Seems most likely to me that EMR will borrow a few class 170s from other operators, or use the class 221s in storage, with XC driver trainers being quickly sent across.
Not sure XC would have any spare capacity for that as they are desperately trying to train new entrants on their own trains. Lots of advertising for new drivers at XC, and it is oft said from advertising to emerging from basic training takes at least a year I believe the September cohort of XC trainees was selected months ago, so I am guessing they are looking at 2026 next.

More likely EMR's own instructors carrying out conversion courses 222 > 221 if at all. It would be a way of Alstom earning some bunce off assets 221101-221106, particular as the WSM project seems to be struggling at the moment
 
Last edited:

Taunton

Established Member
Joined
1 Aug 2013
Messages
11,208
Can the Heritage societies not pull together a bunch of Black 5s, Jubilees and Peaks to help out temporarily ... :)
 

duffield

Established Member
Joined
31 Jul 2013
Messages
2,339
Location
East Midlands
Class 170s are limited to 100mph. Doesn't the current timetable rely on some 110/125mph running for the EMR intercity services, to avoid conflicts with Thameslink at the southern end of the MML? Surely the last time 170s ran to St. Pancras the Thameslink timetable was less intensive?

What I see as more likely would be running 170 shuttles from Nottingham to Leicester to connect with Sheffield/Derby to St. Pancras services instead of the current stopping xx12 service (that sort of thing *has* been done in the past). It would be pretty awful, with Nottingham passengers likely to not get a seat at Leicester, but I'm afraid I think the Derby/Sheffield service is seen as a priority.

Also I can see one of the two hourly Sheffield services being cut back to Derby (this was actually how they operated going back a few years). Many of these services seem quite lightly loaded between Derby and Sheffield.

So how would the following work with the remaining 222s:
1 tph from Nottingham
1 tph from Sheffield/Derby
1 tph from Derby, connecting to a 170 shuttle from Nottingham at Leicester

How many 222s would that save if all services were single 222s? And how many if the connecting service was doubled up to allow for the Nottingham passengers joining?

Of course there's also the possibility of reducing one of the two hourly services from Corby to a Corby/Kettering shuttle, which would free up a path which might allow 170s to run to St. Pancras.
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
21,349
Of course there's also the possibility of reducing one of the two hourly services from Corby to a Corby/Kettering shuttle, which would free up a path which might allow 170s to run to St. Pancras.
Or terminating the 170 or 222 at Kettering for passengers to take the Corby service into London, which would be better use of capacity?
 

Topological

Established Member
Joined
20 Feb 2023
Messages
1,952
Location
Swansea
Or terminating the 170 or 222 at Kettering for passengers to take the Corby service into London, which would be better use of capacity?
That is a better suggestion. Would not be so bad if the Corby was always 8 car (or 12 car).

Presumably they would keep the fast Nottingham and fast Sheffield as 222 for as long as possible.
 

duffield

Established Member
Joined
31 Jul 2013
Messages
2,339
Location
East Midlands
Here's my cynical prediction for the overall situation:
  • EMR keep pretending everything will be fine, right up until the point where the 222s start to go
  • An emergency/degraded timetable (probably involving 170s and resembling some of the ideas above) is introduced
  • An almighty row blows up with all the east mids MPs involved
  • The minister insists "something must be done" to restore a proper intercity service ASAP
  • Some half-cocked "solution" involving class 180s or something is put in motion
  • This "solution" is eventually put in place, at considerable expense, just a couple of months before enough 810s finally go into passenger service to make it unnecessary.
I'll try to remember to revisit this prediction next year and see how it stood up to reality.

:E
 

Brubulus

Member
Joined
13 Oct 2022
Messages
536
Location
Cambridge
Here's my cynical prediction for the overall situation:
  • EMR keep pretending everything will be fine, right up until the point where the 222s start to go
  • An emergency/degraded timetable (probably involving 170s and resembling some of the ideas above) is introduced
  • An almighty row blows up with all the east mids MPs involved
  • The minister insists "something must be done" to restore a proper intercity service ASAP
  • Some half-cocked "solution" involving class 180s or something is put in motion
  • This "solution" is eventually put in place, at considerable expense, just a couple of months before enough 810s finally go into passenger service to make it unnecessary.
I'll try to remember to revisit this prediction next year and see how it stood up to reality.

:E
I think what will happen is the first few 222s will leave with no replacement. There will be no political row. Our glorious DfT will announce that they are "boosting capacity" and "protecting customers" by rolling out 170s. 170s should be able to run on the Nottingham services without destroying the timetable. There will likely be some 170s borrowed from Northern, most likely subjecting the people of Harrogate to sprinters. 6 car 170s have substantially more capacity than 5 car 222s.
I find it unlikely the DfT will take proactive action to lease extra stock.
 

Class 170101

Established Member
Joined
1 Mar 2014
Messages
8,425
Of course there's also the possibility of reducing one of the two hourly services from Corby to a Corby/Kettering shuttle, which would free up a path which might allow 170s to run to St. Pancras.
More likely the limited stop services to both Sheffield and Nottingham would be withdrawn to save stock.

Corby to London is all electric stock which there isn't a shortage of but it also can't help you north of Market Harborough.
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
18,791
Corby to London is all electric stock which there isn't a shortage of but it also can't help you north of Market Harborough.
What happens if you break all services on the MML at either Kettering or Market Harborough?

You could put all traffic south of there onto Class 360s and save the time necessary to run into London and out again.
 

Class 170101

Established Member
Joined
1 Mar 2014
Messages
8,425
Maybe this is a solution for the "what shall we do with these 350/2s" conundrum.
Still doesn't help you unless you force all passengers to change at Kettering.

I think its more likely to be Class 180s or the spare 221s as has been highlighted already.
 

bluenoxid

Established Member
Joined
9 Feb 2008
Messages
2,540
Harrogate line passengers are very aware of 150’s and 158’s with regular diagrams and substitutions.
 

Zomboid

Member
Joined
2 Apr 2025
Messages
881
Location
Oxford
Would they have to? If they're keeping the northern extent to diesel and running 110mph electrics south of there then some trains could be 360s and others 350s. No obvious need for them to couple.
 

Iskra

Established Member
Joined
11 Jun 2014
Messages
9,254
Location
West Riding
More likely the limited stop services to both Sheffield and Nottingham would be withdrawn to save stock.

Corby to London is all electric stock which there isn't a shortage of but it also can't help you north of Market Harborough.
No chance that happens.

More likely TfW cascade 6x150 to Northern to release 170’s from their Sheffield-Scarborough services to fill the gap.

I still think 180’s or HST’s from GWR are most likely however.
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
21,349
More likely TfW cascade 6x150 to Northern to release 170’s from their Sheffield-Scarborough services to fill the gap.
Is it? Is there a source for that? The idea of moving 170s away from Northern is a favourite on this forum, and always countered by people who actually have anything to do with those units.
 
Last edited:

Top