D365
Veteran Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 12,245
Would Hitachi have won the order if they had given realistic timescales?Just think how much of this could have been avoided if realistic timescales had been given right from the start..
Would Hitachi have won the order if they had given realistic timescales?Just think how much of this could have been avoided if realistic timescales had been given right from the start..
Probably not. EMRs ask was very off the shelf. I suspect they may be regretting not going for a 110mph train. Although had the whole line got electrified i suspect we would have a better conclusion. With how tight money is the passengers may not think so as it would probably be refurbished 350/2.Would Hitachi have won the order if they had given realistic timescales?
I don't see why they would have any regrets, running at 110mph instead of 120/125mph south of Bedford costs around 3 minutes. From a commercial point of view that would mean extending the journey time on all of their biggest flows (i.e. London - Nottingham, Leicester and Sheffield) which doesn't make any sense.Probably not. EMRs ask was very off the shelf. I suspect they may be regretting not going for a 110mph train. Although had the whole line got electrified i suspect we would have a better conclusion.
When the 222s start getting taken awayHow long until this becomes a greater farce than the class 701?
And if it were a tie breaker at that point, ultimate humiliation would be 170s returning to STP.When the 222s start getting taken away
Not sure XC would have any spare capacity for that as they are desperately trying to train new entrants on their own trains. Lots of advertising for new drivers at XC, and it is oft said from advertising to emerging from basic training takes at least a year I believe the September cohort of XC trainees was selected months ago, so I am guessing they are looking at 2026 next.Seems most likely to me that EMR will borrow a few class 170s from other operators, or use the class 221s in storage, with XC driver trainers being quickly sent across.
Aren't they owned by Beacon Rail?It would be a way of Alstom earning some bunce off assets 221101-221106
Can the Heritage societies not pull together a bunch of Black 5s, Jubilees and Peaks to help out temporarily ...![]()
Or terminating the 170 or 222 at Kettering for passengers to take the Corby service into London, which would be better use of capacity?Of course there's also the possibility of reducing one of the two hourly services from Corby to a Corby/Kettering shuttle, which would free up a path which might allow 170s to run to St. Pancras.
That is a better suggestion. Would not be so bad if the Corby was always 8 car (or 12 car).Or terminating the 170 or 222 at Kettering for passengers to take the Corby service into London, which would be better use of capacity?
I think what will happen is the first few 222s will leave with no replacement. There will be no political row. Our glorious DfT will announce that they are "boosting capacity" and "protecting customers" by rolling out 170s. 170s should be able to run on the Nottingham services without destroying the timetable. There will likely be some 170s borrowed from Northern, most likely subjecting the people of Harrogate to sprinters. 6 car 170s have substantially more capacity than 5 car 222s.Here's my cynical prediction for the overall situation:
I'll try to remember to revisit this prediction next year and see how it stood up to reality.
- EMR keep pretending everything will be fine, right up until the point where the 222s start to go
- An emergency/degraded timetable (probably involving 170s and resembling some of the ideas above) is introduced
- An almighty row blows up with all the east mids MPs involved
- The minister insists "something must be done" to restore a proper intercity service ASAP
- Some half-cocked "solution" involving class 180s or something is put in motion
- This "solution" is eventually put in place, at considerable expense, just a couple of months before enough 810s finally go into passenger service to make it unnecessary.
![]()
Where are you going to find the Sprinters to run those services without casuing short forms and overcrouding in the North?There will likely be some 170s borrowed from Northern, most likely subjecting the people of Harrogate to sprinters.
More likely the limited stop services to both Sheffield and Nottingham would be withdrawn to save stock.Of course there's also the possibility of reducing one of the two hourly services from Corby to a Corby/Kettering shuttle, which would free up a path which might allow 170s to run to St. Pancras.
What happens if you break all services on the MML at either Kettering or Market Harborough?Corby to London is all electric stock which there isn't a shortage of but it also can't help you north of Market Harborough.
Still doesn't help you unless you force all passengers to change at Kettering.Maybe this is a solution for the "what shall we do with these 350/2s" conundrum.
Yep and EMR hopefully running 12 coaches this time!Or terminating the 170 or 222 at Kettering for passengers to take the Corby service into London, which would be better use of capacity?
Do you know if 350/2s can couple with EMR's 360s?Maybe this is a solution for the "what shall we do with these 350/2s" conundrum.
Newport!Where are you going to find the Sprinters to run those services without casuing short forms and overcrouding in the North?
No chance that happens.More likely the limited stop services to both Sheffield and Nottingham would be withdrawn to save stock.
Corby to London is all electric stock which there isn't a shortage of but it also can't help you north of Market Harborough.
Is it?More likely TfW cascade 6x150 to Northern to release 170’s from their Sheffield-Scarborough services to fill the gap.