On a point of order - having looked at the pictures, he looks remarkably similar to the "vidiot" who nearly got wiped out by a 170 a few months ago; could it be the same man?
Certainly could be.
On a point of order - having looked at the pictures, he looks remarkably similar to the "vidiot" who nearly got wiped out by a 170 a few months ago; could it be the same man?
Yes but there is a difference between a preserved railway running trains at a maximum speed of 25mph as they are classed as light railways to Network Rail running trains at speeds of up to 125mph.
Adding to the fact that trains on the national network run at different speeds, how long do you reckon you've got to judge the speed and distance of a incoming train - not long at all, maybe a few seconds if you're lucky.
Maybe having a look at these videos will show why it's idiotic to be unsafe on the railway:
[youtube]Je5N4FKIxKM[/youtube]
[youtube]dnkG7G6n2Bg[/youtube]
Be warned, some of the footage is gruesome.
Certainly could be.
Great videos - very, very moving. We need more hard hitting stuff like this to get the message out. Shame about the dodgy acting in the second vid, but great testimonials from the crew. Thanks for posting.
I would be inclined to say not, same hairline, same nose, same ears, same mouth, same chin? Nah, couldn't be.
not forgetting the same jacket as the right hand picture above, or is this picture taken of the guy who nearly got scat over?
Has anyone seen this blokes phots and vids? Being that close to the subject they really must be top notch
Maybe having a look at these videos will show why it's idiotic to be unsafe on the railway:
[youtube]Je5N4FKIxKM[/youtube]
[youtube]dnkG7G6n2Bg[/youtube]
I am surprised by some people's idea about being the 'wrong side of the fence' not being dangerous. Even if it wasn't dangerous if you were walking along a motorway embankment nowhere near the hard shoulder you would be likely to be pulled up by police for being 'the wrong side of the fence'. if you were on someone's property 'the wrong side of the fence' they would be entitled to call the police to have you moved. It's called the 'wrong side of the fence' because you have no right to be there.
As for the safety aspects even well trained and highly visible p-way staff who know how to behave trackside still get killed through a momentary lapse.
In these days of heightened safety etc anyone who is trackside should be considered suspect - wonder what would happen to a plane spotter if they were to go the 'wrong side of the fence' at Heathrow ?
<SNIP>
There's a great video on YouTube about two railway staff who had to check on their train at a station. They contacted the signaller and through some sort of mis-communication, they thought the fast line was closed so they could get out an inspect. The line was not closed as a Pendolino thundered directly towards them, and they were forced to take cover under the voyager. This was actually a documentary and re-enactment. Can't find the video anywhere now though.
Thanks a lot. Any ideas where it came from (dvd etc.)?
I think its a network rail safety film.Thanks a lot. Any ideas where it came from (dvd etc.)?
Never thought I would see a "red" video on here, where did you get it from?
azymitch 1 year ago
RED is a series of programmes that aims to improve operational safety on GB railways. Each programme provides a reconstruction of an operational incident and then analyses the practises and behaviours which contributed to the incident and looks at the root causes and remdeies. RED aims to drive down the level of risk by improving standards of safety critical communication, situational awareness and overall safety.
RED is about operating incidents which are of interest to anyone operating and managing the railway: from drivers and signallers to managers and specialists at all levels.
By funding and facilitating this series, RSSB is assisting OFG in promoting a more progressive and open safety culture in which there is respect for the contribution of all and recognition that there are still many systemic issues that must be addressed if improvements are to be delivered.