• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Corby to Derby Train - What type of train is it?

Status
Not open for further replies.

RyBro5676

Member
Joined
16 Jan 2015
Messages
6
I am talking about the 09:26 leaving Corby and arriving at Derby at 10:45

This is a parliamentary train where there is one service a day there and back.

I live in Melton Mowbray where I would catch this train to go to Derby as a day trip since it is the only direct service that goes there.

The train company is East Midlands Trains where the last time I went there was 2 years ago where it was a class 222 Merdian which was 4 cars.

I have checked the timetable, and it says that this service is operated by a HST!

I would like to know if this is right and if it is, when did East Midlands Trains start doing this and why are they doing it?

p.s. I am going to Derby in a months time and if it is operated by a HST, this has got to be the shortest journey ever by that train class.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

PHILIPE

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Nov 2011
Messages
13,472
Location
Caerphilly
Here is the Meridian 4 Car Diagram:-
Is it a Parliamentary or Route Retention train ?

Diagram 3
5P99 0513 Etches Park Sdgs to Corby 0654
1P12 0708 Corby to Kettering 0717
1M00 0738 Kettering to Corby 0747
1P19 0802 Corby to Kettering 0811
1M05 0832 Kettering to Corby 0841
5M05 0851 Corby to Corby North Run-round Loop 0853
5M06 0918 Corby North Run-round Loop to Corby 0920
1M06 0926 Corby to Derby 1045
5M06 1055 Derby to Etches Park Sdgs 1109
5P69 1613 Etches Park Sdgs to Derby 1627
1P69 1636 Derby to St Pancras International 1926 (Via Corby)
1D74 2030 St Pancras International to Nottingham 2218 (Leading unit)
5D74 2240 Nottingham to Etches Park Sdgs 2330
__________________
 

fishquinn

Established Member
Associate Staff
Quizmaster
Joined
4 Oct 2013
Messages
6,643
Location
Warwickshire
Oh ok. I checked both the EMT timetable and RTT. Both said tram so I just assumed.

Before someone comes along and says that RTT doesn't show what a train is booked for, I know. RTT is usually quite accurate for the EMT intercity services.
 

70014IronDuke

Established Member
Joined
13 Jun 2015
Messages
3,699
Here is the Meridian 4 Car Diagram:-
Is it a Parliamentary or Route Retention train ?


__________________

Surely it is not a parliamentary train. There was no service north of Corby for many years, and no legal need to introduce one. (Unless it was in the franchise bid as a condition - I doubt it.)

But, having done so, what now? Does it mean the operator must maintain the service?

There is still the one up and evening return via Melton to St Pancras, of course.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,437
Surely it is not a parliamentary train. There was no service north of Corby for many years, and no legal need to introduce one. (Unless it was in the franchise bid as a condition - I doubt it.)

But, having done so, what now? Does it mean the operator must maintain the service?

I agree, an 'off pattern' service on its own (even if one way) doesn't make something parliamentary, what they are presumably doing is putting into public use a train which would otherwise cover the same route from the depot to enter service as empty stock (ECS).

In the general case DfT can eventually make any service part of a franchise specification, but they still have a means of treating it as some sort of a 'medium term trial' # and therefore there'd still be a possibility of cancelling it without formal closure procedures.

# There's a name for this type of service but I'm blowed if I can find it at the moment.

Edited to add:

Is it an 'experimental service' under what was known as the Speller Amendment, IIRC they can be run for up to 5 years and closed without fuss?
 
Last edited:

louis97

Established Member
Joined
14 May 2008
Messages
1,903
Location
Derby
Surely it is not a parliamentary train. There was no service north of Corby for many years, and no legal need to introduce one. (Unless it was in the franchise bid as a condition - I doubt it.)

But, having done so, what now? Does it mean the operator must maintain the service?

There is still the one up and evening return via Melton to St Pancras, of course.

I presume Manton has always been a diversion route, does that count? At the moment it (and the return in the afternoon) basically acts as a route retention service - however in service instead of ECS.

Its booked a 4-car meridian. It will only be a HST if theve ran out of meridians and have one spare, which no longer happens anymore.

Can't happen anymore, no spare set at Derby! Although that is highly likely the reason why the morning part of the diagram is timed for a HST, to allow for it to be one without causing any issues.
 
Last edited:

70014IronDuke

Established Member
Joined
13 Jun 2015
Messages
3,699
I presume Manton has always been a diversion route, does that count?

I thought at first you might be trolling here, but then decided perhaps not.

The Melton "Back Road" route was a main line until c1968, although at the end it was somewhat less so than up to 1966. Traditionally, most of the St Pancras - Sheffield - Bradford expresses went this way, along with the Waverley (but not the Thames-Clyde).

After the loss of the Manchester exrpesses to the WCML, BR decided it was no longer viable to keep open as a parallel route to the Trent-Leicester-St Pancras main line we have today.

Pancras - Sheffield expresses that went via Nottingham had to reverse there.

In fairness, Melton passengers could go to Leicester, Oakham (a small place in any case) to Peterborough. Only Corby really missed out - they were expected to bus it to Kettering.

It was kept open for freight, as its gradient profile is much better than the main line over Desboro summit.

At the moment it (and the return in the afternoon) basically acts as a route retention service - however in service instead of ECS.

Doesn't EMT say that it's timed to give Corby (and other stations) a connectoin into and out of a Glasgow XC train at Derby? In other words, a genuinely commercial service?

I think i remember reading that if successful, more trains would be considered.

Does anyone know how well (or poorly?) used it is?
 

fsmr

Member
Joined
11 Feb 2009
Messages
659
Yes the Corby line takes scheduled trains and planned diversions. It also takes emergency diversions such as occurred with last weeks signal cable damage below Leicester In that case none of the EMT diverted trains showed correctly on RTT as according to RTT they dont go in the systems the same so the train effectively vanishes at Leicester as it then has to head North to Syston and around through Oakham to re-join at Kettering

Interesting one today on driver training that went from St Pancras to Syston via Corby line and Oakham and then back to Cricklewood same way,

http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/C82761/2015/09/24/advanced

I live in Oakham, BTW
 

Tomnick

Established Member
Joined
10 Jun 2005
Messages
5,840
Interesting one today on driver training that went from St Pancras to Syston via Corby line and Oakham and then back to Cricklewood same way,

http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/C82761/2015/09/24/advanced
That's been a fairly regular runner for some months now, for route retention as opposed to route learning as I understand it - London drivers, I'm told, have very little booked work between Syston and Corby (just 5P79 on a Saturday afternoon?), hence the addition of this one. 5Z44, on the other hand, which has run several times over the last few weeks (but cancelled today), is a route learner for Derby folk.
 

tocguard

Member
Joined
16 Nov 2014
Messages
67
Location
Derbyshire
Doesn't EMT say that it's timed to give Corby (and other stations) a connectoin into and out of a Glasgow XC train at Derby? In other words, a genuinely commercial service?

I think i remember reading that if successful, more trains would be considered.

Does anyone know how well (or poorly?) used it is?

Quite possibly this may have been a thought to be operated by local route trains and crew. All emt sprinters have "Corby" and "Kettering" on the blinds. Presumably it could be operated as Corby or Kettering to Derby using existing Ivanhoe line stations therfore giving those communities direct services to new destinations.

Don't know about the patronage of the service as it's currently operated by Derby Mainline crew.

Unless anyone has any other ideas i can't understand why emt would have had those destinations printed on the blinds?

Obviously, providing such a service would mean having to have extra stock. Perhaps it was an initial thought towards the start of the franchise and the opening of corby station.
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
15,967
Location
East Anglia
Am i mis-reading this thread? Not sure whats unusual about Derby-Corby via Melton. Been booked trains on this route for years now.
 

Tomnick

Established Member
Joined
10 Jun 2005
Messages
5,840
Quite possibly this may have been a thought to be operated by local route trains and crew. All emt sprinters have "Corby" and "Kettering" on the blinds. Presumably it could be operated as Corby or Kettering to Derby using existing Ivanhoe line stations therfore giving those communities direct services to new destinations.

Don't know about the patronage of the service as it's currently operated by Derby Mainline crew.

Unless anyone has any other ideas i can't understand why emt would have had those destinations printed on the blinds?

Obviously, providing such a service would mean having to have extra stock. Perhaps it was an initial thought towards the start of the franchise and the opening of corby station.
At some point, wasn't it proposed that the Corby service would consist of no more than a shuttle to Kettering, more suited to 15x traction? Obviously that was knocked on the head by the time that a through London service became a commitment, but the first part of the diagram above (5P99, 1P12, 1M00, 1P19, 1M05, 1M06) would, leaving aside the crewing issues, probably be adequately served by a local unit, maybe releasing the four-car unit to cover something else in the morning peak.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,437
Am i mis-reading this thread? Not sure whats unusual about Derby-Corby via Melton. Been booked trains on this route for years now.

A think a couple of us were just challenging the OP's presumption that it was a 'parliamentary', purely because of it being infrequent.

There was also the tangential question of whether any service once introduced automatically became permanent and would have to undergo closure proceedings if it ceased, and I found that there can be a 5 yr trial period, but the point wasn't about this particular train... That all probably lost the focus of the thread...
 
Last edited:

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
15,967
Location
East Anglia
A think a couple of us were just challenging the OP's presumption that it was a 'parliamentary', purely because of it being infrequent.

There was also the tangential question of whether any service once introduced automatically became permanent and would have to undergo closure proceedings if it ceased, and I found that there can be a 5 yr trial period, but the point wasn't about this particular train... That all probably lost the focus of the thread...

Ok thanks. Confused me that one. I've used it a few times & the afternoon up train can be reasonably busy as they sell bargain basement APs to London St.Pan.
 

tocguard

Member
Joined
16 Nov 2014
Messages
67
Location
Derbyshire
At some point, wasn't it proposed that the Corby service would consist of no more than a shuttle to Kettering, more suited to 15x traction? Obviously that was knocked on the head by the time that a through London service became a commitment, but the first part of the diagram above (5P99, 1P12, 1M00, 1P19, 1M05, 1M06) would, leaving aside the crewing issues, probably be adequately served by a local unit, maybe releasing the four-car unit to cover something else in the morning peak.

Tbh would make much more sense for a 9 minute journey! Total waste of a mainline unit and also in my opinion is a waste of time running direct Corby - STP every hour. I'm sure a waiting connection for 9 minutes is hardly an inconvenience to change trains!
 

Tomnick

Established Member
Joined
10 Jun 2005
Messages
5,840
Tbh would make much more sense for a 9 minute journey! Total waste of a mainline unit and also in my opinion is a waste of time running direct Corby - STP every hour. I'm sure a waiting connection for 9 minutes is hardly an inconvenience to change trains!
In fairness, the through trains (after the shuttles in the morning peak) do provide a fifth train per hour south of Kettering and take some of the pressure from intermediate stations off the longer distance services. I doubt it could ever be justified on the basis of the benefits to Corby alone!
 

A0wen

On Moderation
Joined
19 Jan 2008
Messages
7,479
In fairness, the through trains (after the shuttles in the morning peak) do provide a fifth train per hour south of Kettering and take some of the pressure from intermediate stations off the longer distance services. I doubt it could ever be justified on the basis of the benefits to Corby alone!

It was (and still is) a bit of a mixed blessing to the intermediate stations (Kettering, Wellingboro', Bedford and Luton) in that these services are usually quieter and the chances of getting a seat are much better than on the longer distance services - however it did mean the reduction, by 50%, of a useful northbound service to Leicester and beyond.

What they should have done is retained the Kettering stop to allow an every 30 min service from Kettering onto Leicester but deleted the others.

Longer term - the correct thing to do would be have Corby every 30 mins stopping at Kettering, Wellingborough, Bedford and one of the Luton stations and then an hourly (Nottingham or Sheffield) service which runs fast to Wellingborough and then covers Kettering, Mkt Harborough and Leicester.
 

Tomnick

Established Member
Joined
10 Jun 2005
Messages
5,840
It was (and still is) a bit of a mixed blessing to the intermediate stations (Kettering, Wellingboro', Bedford and Luton) in that these services are usually quieter and the chances of getting a seat are much better than on the longer distance services - however it did mean the reduction, by 50%, of a useful northbound service to Leicester and beyond.

What they should have done is retained the Kettering stop to allow an every 30 min service from Kettering onto Leicester but deleted the others.

Longer term - the correct thing to do would be have Corby every 30 mins stopping at Kettering, Wellingborough, Bedford and one of the Luton stations and then an hourly (Nottingham or Sheffield) service which runs fast to Wellingborough and then covers Kettering, Mkt Harborough and Leicester.
What, not everyone wants to travel to London?!

Although it does represent quite an improvement for Loughborough (as one train per hour is now fast to London after Leicester), it does limit the options for journeys to intermediate stations south of Leicester compared to the previous timetable, but then I suppose 1tph wouldn't be considered bad for a regional link between relatively small towns if they didn't happen to be on the way to London!
 
Joined
14 Aug 2012
Messages
1,070
Location
Stratford
I am talking about the 09:26 leaving Corby and arriving at Derby at 10:45

This is a parliamentary train where there is one service a day there and back.

I live in Melton Mowbray where I would catch this train to go to Derby as a day trip since it is the only direct service that goes there.

The train company is East Midlands Trains where the last time I went there was 2 years ago where it was a class 222 Merdian which was 4 cars.

I have checked the timetable, and it says that this service is operated by a HST!

I would like to know if this is right and if it is, when did East Midlands Trains start doing this and why are they doing it?

p.s. I am going to Derby in a months time and if it is operated by a HST, this has got to be the shortest journey ever by that train class.

I think the service has been in place since Corby station reopened again, not really a parliament train in the sense that the route has always been a diversion route, nearly every winter on Sundays there were booking to go that route as maintenance was taking place between Leicester and Kettering
 

bunnahabhain

Established Member
Joined
8 Jun 2005
Messages
2,070
I can't quite remember, but I'm fairly sure the plan was for a Corby to Bedford (London off peak?) service operated using 2x158 sets, these being released by using the 222/4 sets on certain Nottingham to Liverpool diagrams. This wasn't really suitable to either service for capacity reasons so it didn't happen!
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,437

rower40

Member
Joined
1 Jan 2008
Messages
332
Currently on board this (derby to st p via corby).
while we crawled round the Syston north curve, a freight came the other way.
How often has anyone seen two trains pass on that curve?
 

70014IronDuke

Established Member
Joined
13 Jun 2015
Messages
3,699
Currently on board this (derby to st p via corby).
while we crawled round the Syston north curve, a freight came the other way.
How often has anyone seen two trains pass on that curve?

I am intrigued by such odd workings.

What are the loadings like? Has anyone got on a Melton, or Oakham?

Or off, for that matter?
 

rower40

Member
Joined
1 Jan 2008
Messages
332
Not very busy. I was travelling Derby to Cambridge; and the only other passenger in 1st class also alighted (alit?) at Oakham.

When I used this a few weeks ago on a Friday evening, the conductor told me that EM Trains sold many cheap tickets on that train, to boost the loadings.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top