But the alternative on offer was not PR.Had a Referendum in 2011. 2 to 1 voted to retain FPTP.
But the alternative on offer was not PR.Had a Referendum in 2011. 2 to 1 voted to retain FPTP.
Only if the Unionist parties get their acts together to present themselves as a viable alternative to the SNP.Interesting to see people talking in this thread about voting SNP but not wanting independence. If this represents a fair number of people in the country, SNP could lose out at the next election.
Given the results of the 2015 election, UKIP would receive 12% of seats (assuming a full national PR set-up), probably forming a coalition with the Tories to take power. This would doubtless have lead to the same result re: EU referendum that we saw.
The SNP has occupied a gap previously filled by the Labour Party. Voters may believe they're supporting a grassroots, socially aware party, but it's also a fundamentally nationalist party, like Sinn Fein, who also do good work at a local level. The SNP is a symptom of the failure of British politics north of the border. Voters who think they're subscribing to anything other than an independent Scotland are naïve IMO.Like najaB I'm another who voted SNP without wishing to have independence, in my case partly because our local MP is very good. I know quite a few others who have voted tactically for the SNP.
AN independent Scotland would face ten years of economic pain to find itself back in the same position as it is now, according to Nicola Sturgeons own economics guru.
Andrew Wilson, the man charged with making the new case for independence, has briefed Nicola Sturgeon that a decade of lost growth would have to be endured as the price of independence.
The frank assessment was last night described by opponents of the SNP as cross-fingered approach to one of the weakest cards in the independence pack.
You are entitled to hold that opinion, but it is completely wrong.Voters who think they're subscribing to anything other than an independent Scotland are naïve IMO.
The evidence suggests I'm correct. The SNP will use any opportunity to represent political differences as the reason why Scotland should be an independent nation. That's their ultimate aim every bit as much as Sinn Fein's is a united Ireland. They're legitimate political ambitions but if people think the SNP's ambition goes no further than ensuring the bins are emptied and the buses keep running, they're deluding themselves and everyone else. Saying that's not true does not mean it isn't and time will show I'm correct.You are entitled to hold that opinion, but it is completely wrong.
The evidence suggests I'm correct. The SNP will use any opportunity to represent political differences as the reason why Scotland should be an independent nation. That's their ultimate aim every bit as much as Sinn Fein's is a united Ireland. They're legitimate political ambitions but if people think the SNP's ambition goes no further than ensuring the bins are emptied and the buses keep running, they're deluding themselves and everyone else. Saying that's not true does not mean it isn't and time will show I'm correct.
Even if the SNP were to get 100% of the vote in a the Scottish Parliament, General, Local Government and European Elections they would still need to hold a referendum in order to gain the mandate to seek independence.The evidence suggests I'm correct.
The SNP has occupied a gap previously filled by the Labour Party. Voters may believe they're supporting a grassroots, socially aware party, but it's also a fundamentally nationalist party, like Sinn Fein, who also do good work at a local level. The SNP is a symptom of the failure of British politics north of the border. Voters who think they're subscribing to anything other than an independent Scotland are naïve IMO.
You are entitled to hold that opinion, but it is completely wrong.
I'm sure you're right, UKIP is a case in point.However, it doesn't mean that everyone who votes for them shares their core ambition.
That I agree with, and it seemed a small price to pay for a (comparatively) progressive government.At the very least, what you can probably agree on is that voting for the SNP is quite likely to lead either to demands for a referendum or a referendum itself.
Here's a well informed, reasoned, intellectual discourse from a skilled orator about the new Scottish referendum. Clicky.
Warning: Video most definitely not safe for work, or for anyone with delicate ears. I can't even post the title of the video or I'll get banned.
The reason the SNP win the last election was the meltdown of Scottish labour, and its failure to pick it self back up. The other BIG problem for Scottish Labour is its voters: Basiclicy there split right down the middle.... So the pro unionist voters back the Tories because there got fed up. While the pro indy people went to the SNP. While everyone in the middle who just wants everything else to get sorted like Roads, trains, health, education, police gets screwed.
I am still waiting to hear "I kent her faither" about Nicola Sturgeon!
SNP own adviser admits it would take economy 10yrs to recover from Independence - that's 4 generations!
And they would be perfectly entitled to do so. As I said above, self-determination is a basic right of any people.
If the clearly demonstrated will of the Scottish electorate is at odds with the clearly demonstrated will of the rest of the UK then it can hardly be called a 'United' Kingdom can it?
However roughly 50% of Scots appear to be keen to be part of a United Kingdom.
Personally I hope that given the opportunity Scots do indeed vote for independence but I get the feeling that perhaps 48% of the population would be very unhappy with that decision. Which of course is rather like the Brexit vote.