ModernRailways
Established Member
- Joined
- 21 Apr 2011
- Messages
- 2,050
Image hopefully attached with a train in LNER branding. Seems to be similar to what some had predicted.
Not my picture.
I fully concur!For some reason it reminds me of this:
The leading door at the first class end is not for passenger use (it leads into the kitchen), so does not need to be a contrasting colour.Also, aren't they doing the doors in a colour? Or is the break in the stripe going to be enough?
I fully concur!
The leading door at the first class end is not for passenger use (it leads into the kitchen), so does not need to be a contrasting colour.
I haven't seen a photo yet where the passenger doors are visible, but I assume they remain dark grey.
Agree with this (both points) wholeheartedly. To me the red looks horribly tacky and garish, especially on a white background... and Azuma just makes me think of that company that used to recycle old mobile phones.Anyone else think the livery would be better if the Virign Red was replaced with Apple Green or Caledonian Blue? No nostalgia reasons here, they just happen to be nice colours.
I was thinking something along the lines of the old Great Western Merlin livery with Apple Green or the Caley Blue and the the LNER brand in gold writing in place of the Merlin logo.
They should seriously consider dropping the stupid Azuma name.... it's crap and stinks of Virgin hipster bulls***!
Anything is better than Azuma. It is not nice to pronounce and not English.. What does the GWR call them?How about calling it the...
Javelin.
I'll get my coat...
I think each one should have a different colour stripe as Court airline used to paint their aircraft.
Anyone else think the livery would be better if the Virign Red was replaced with Apple Green or Caledonian Blue? No nostalgia reasons here, they just happen to be nice colours.
I was thinking something along the lines of the old Great Western Merlin livery with Apple Green or the Caley Blue and the the LNER brand in gold writing in place of the Merlin logo.
They should seriously consider dropping the stupid Azuma name.... it's crap and stinks of Virgin hipster bulls***!
Agree with this (both points) wholeheartedly. To me the red looks horribly tacky and garish, especially on a white background... and Azuma just makes me think of that company that used to recycle old mobile phones.
I'd opt for Caley blue, but that's just an opinion, no more no less. However I will agree about the name azuma, it sounds relatively too close to a company who buys your old mobile phones for next to zed all!
I think there was one in yellow also?Like the Tyne and Wear Metro cars used to have red, green and blue variants.
I appreciate that it's not the sleek corporate image that LNER will be going for, but there's a childlike part of my mind that idea appeals to. It would add some interest to an otherwise bland and uninspiring scheme.Like the Tyne and Wear Metro cars used to have red, green and blue variants.
Red, blue and green were the three standard identities applied as part of the 1995 - 2000 refurbishment. Prototype Metrocar 4001 was repainted back into the pre-1986 Metro yellow and white scheme around the time the Sunderland extension opened (I think) in 2002, and was very much a one off. There were always a host of advertising liveries going around, too.I think there was one in yellow also?
Anything is better than Azuma. It is not nice to pronounce and not English.. What does the GWR call them?
Any colour other than red. It still reminds me of the grinning bearded monkey. Is this the Government plan to hand it back in two years time?
I think each one should have a different colour stripe as Court airline used to paint their aircraft.
I somehow doubt that Hitachi particularly care, or can particularly control what they're called by the TOC.I suspect the reason they have kept Azuma is because it may have been too late to change with Hitachi, as things had progressed so much before the changeover. Even the press launch had already taken place. Could be wrong though but I suspect that was the case.
Makes me think of Montezuma's Revenge! More appropriate I think.I somehow doubt that Hitachi particularly care, or can particularly control what they're called by the TOC.
The real reason that azuma was kept on (at least according to one of their brand people on twitter) was because azuma was a staff chosen name and they wanted to keep it
GWR staff are increasingly using "Super Hitachi Intercity Trains", or the acronym of.GWR calls then Intercity Express Trains. Or IETs for short.
I suspect the reason they have kept Azuma is because it may have been too late to change with Hitachi, as things had progressed so much before the changeover. Even the press launch had already taken place. Could be wrong though but I suspect that was the case.
Personally I'm in favour of what you indicated, just use the GWR name universally for all Hitachi IEPs, and call them IETs. In the same way HSTs are HSTs no matter who has them.
GWR staff are increasingly using "Super Hitachi Intercity Trains", or the acronym of.
That and the fact that with so many units built, with VTEC designed interiors, you've got a lot of red in the brand. Same with staff uniforms. As much as Garter Blue or Apple Green would be a great base livery (especially the former with silver doors) it would be a lot of money spent on repainting the units.The real reason that azuma was kept on (at least according to one of their brand people on twitter) was because azuma was a staff chosen name and they wanted to keep it.
I think there was one in yellow also?
That and the fact that with so many units built, with VTEC designed interiors, you've got a lot of red in the brand. Same with staff uniforms. As much as Garter Blue or Apple Green would be a great base livery (especially the former with silver doors) it would be a lot of money spent on repainting the units.
Exactly, as I said, Montezuma's Revenge. (diarrhea for anyone who doesn't know what Montezuma's Revenge is)GWR staff are increasingly using "Super Hitachi Intercity Trains", or the acronym of.
At least the first 225 that East Coast rebranded, if not a few of the subsequent ones, were actually silver, and I thought that they looked rather smart. They definitely glinted.
The majority, however, were indeed grey.
I’m not sure if the distinction was that the silver one/s was/were painted, and the grey ones vinylled.
That's the problem with choosing a heritage name though.
If they had have reverted back to East Coast, the problem would be solved, but they've played the history card, and that comes with, err, history.
Personally, I don't care what they paint them, but I can see why there's paint froth on this occasion.
In Scotland there can be issues with colour schemes and how certain colours are used together. Think Old Firm, extrapolate further and add two and two to make four. It's something that graphic design companies up here are acutely aware of.Maybe the Hitachis, which hadn’t already been painted up, could have had a livery that was red, white and blue, which would not only combine the existing Virgin colours with the blue that a lot of people associate with the LNER (through Mallard) but also combine the colours of England and Scotland - double win? I don’t know.
In Scotland there can be issues with colour schemes and how certain colours are used together. Think Old Firm, extrapolate further and add two and two to make four. It's something that graphic design companies up here are acutely aware of.
Ah yes - Red, White and Blue would be very much Rangers-leaning wouldn’t it? Could be very divisive, it’s a fair point.
Smart enough livery, but the application leaves a lot to be desired. It looks very obviously to be stickers, particularly at the front end, and that will only get worse with weathering etc. Virgin's 'flowing silk' is also vinyl but the application is nowhere near as jarring.