• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

GTR possibly planning away with 365s?

Status
Not open for further replies.

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
28,058
Location
UK
Mod - split from here.

GTR must be planning to get rid of the remaining 365s as they're now keeping dispatch staff at some stations for just a few services a day. From a financial point of view, switching all trains to units with bodyside cameras (and self dispatch) would seem like a necessity sooner rather than later.

If that happens the whole fleet would be available to someone else.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
17,775
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
GTR must be planning to get rid of the remaining 365s as they're now keeping dispatch staff at some stations for just a few services a day. From a financial point of view, switching all trains to units with bodyside cameras (and self dispatch) would seem like a necessity sooner rather than later.

If that happens the whole fleet would be available to someone else.

Surely GTR wouldn’t be planning anything with them being just a management contract?

I thought at one time there was a plan to fit bodyside cameras? Surely the issue over dispatch could be resolved since it only affects certain platforms. No staff at Knebworth platform 4 for example.
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
28,058
Location
UK
Surely GTR wouldn’t be planning anything with them being just a management contract?

I thought at one time there was a plan to fit bodyside cameras? Surely the issue over dispatch could be resolved since it only affects certain platforms. No staff at Knebworth platform 4 for example.

I should imagine they'd be consulting the DfT, but it might not happen until the end of the current contract, given the solution could be a run on order of 700s.

It's my personal opinion, but I think they'll be cascaded eventually or the timetables/stock utilisation will be adjusted to reduce issues.
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
17,775
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
I should imagine they'd be consulting the DfT, but it might not happen until the end of the current contract, given the solution could be a run on order of 700s.

It's my personal opinion, but I think they'll be cascaded eventually or the timetables/stock utilisation will be adjusted to reduce issues.

I really doubt anyone would pay for more 700s to run diagrams which in some cases just work two services per day.

I could see them going if someone could come up with a way of standardising with the Kings Lynn fleet - either more 387s or replacing all with something else. However I can’t see any readily achievable way of doing this.

I’d say ETCS could be the bigger issue rather than dispatch, but given there were plans to fit ETCS to 365s, and there’s the advantage of having spare units to play with, that in itself isn’t insurmountable either. I’d say much depends on the will of the leasing company. Make the 365s attractive to lease and they will stay.
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
28,058
Location
UK
That will likely be their downfall. Air conditioning never got fitted. Amazingly, even with the new screens they never added CCTV. So when it comes to considering the fitment of bodyside cameras or support for new signalling, I rather suspect the decision will be made to leave them as is to end their life somewhere else.

It will be a sad day to see them go, but I can't see their future being very bright and it will only be issues with the DfT or sourcing more stock that keeps them here for some time.
 

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
7,398
That will likely be their downfall. Air conditioning never got fitted. Amazingly, even with the new screens they never added CCTV. So when it comes to considering the fitment of bodyside cameras or support for new signalling, I rather suspect the decision will be made to leave them as is to end their life somewhere else.

It will be a sad day to see them go, but I can't see their future being very bright and it will only be issues with the DfT or sourcing more stock that keeps them here for some time.

Eversholt always seem to do less than the other big 2 ROSCOs on refurbs.

Eversholt also have the 465/0 & /1s so the 365's future may depend up on the 465 future too.
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
17,775
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
That will likely be their downfall. Air conditioning never got fitted. Amazingly, even with the new screens they never added CCTV. So when it comes to considering the fitment of bodyside cameras or support for new signalling, I rather suspect the decision will be made to leave them as is to end their life somewhere else.

It will be a sad day to see them go, but I can't see their future being very bright and it will only be issues with the DfT or sourcing more stock that keeps them here for some time.

Air conditioning and CCTV aren’t a big issue. The former is a non issue, the latter is fairly straightforward to sort if deemed necessary. They’re getting the big in-thing which is wi-fi (this very message even comes via 365 wi-fi!), and the lack of sockets is equivalent to a certain other large class which does its trade on the GN route!

Dispatch is a minor issue. No one is going to buy the equivalent of 20x 4-car units at over a million a carriage just to get rid of a handful of dispatch staff.

Agreed ETCS could be the big unknown. If they can get it to work on a cramped 2-car 158 then achieving same on a 365 shouldn’t be so difficult. Obviously there’s the issue as to whether it’s worth doing all the design on a fleet of 20x units. But having units sitting idle is a plus point, as there’s no difficulty having to fit around a working fleet.

I’d say it all depends on what the leasing company does. Offer them at a good rate and perhaps throw in a couple of mods like CCTV and in-cab monitors and suddenly they’re a pretty good proposition — as long as their reliability holds up. Performance isn’t an issue - they pretty much hold their own compared to other fleets, and lack of 110 mph shouldn’t be an issue especially as long as there are 100 mph 700s around. Being in 4-car formation is possibly a benefit as it allows them to be made up to whatever is needed - indeed the balance of 8-car versus 12-car even changes between the morning and evening peaks!

Just keep them on GN - there’s no passenger appetite to get rid of them.
 

Class 466

Established Member
Joined
5 Mar 2010
Messages
1,425
Eversholt always seem to do less than the other big 2 ROSCOs on refurbs.

Eversholt also have the 465/0 & /1s so the 365's future may depend up on the 465 future too.

Given there’s next to no way anyone would put the effort into making 465s meet the capacity requirements of the next franchise- it’s almost certain they will be off. (Probably cheaper to get new trains).
 

47421

Member
Joined
7 Feb 2012
Messages
655
Location
london
Can we have them on West Anglia please. GA promised to PRM 27x 317s but have only sent one away to be done (anyone know when it will come back and how many they expect to get done by December??). Meantime 720s are delayed UFN. 365s would do nicely for a year or two while GA sort themselves out.
 

MatthewRead

On Moderation
Joined
21 Nov 2014
Messages
1,636
Location
West london
Can we have them on West Anglia please. GA promised to PRM 27x 317s but have only sent one away to be done (anyone know when it will come back and how many they expect to get done by December??). Meantime 720s are delayed UFN. 365s would do nicely for a year or two while GA sort themselves out.
I'm afraid the 365's are not fully cleared for the West Anglia Main line.
 

BigB

Member
Joined
20 Dec 2018
Messages
268
Location
Scotland
365s were not cleared for the Edinburgh Glasgow line either but that was addressed by reviewing each issue.
Are you reading that 365s are not cleared, or unmodified 365s are not cleared? Do the restrictions go into tha detail as they do with locomotive sub classes?
 

TheGrew

Member
Joined
31 Jul 2012
Messages
334
I know this is probably scraping the barrel but could the 365s be reformed into 6 car units? If so I think they could be rather useful on some diagrams in the Manchester area. I have generally found them to have more standing room than the 319s.
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
17,775
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
I know this is probably scraping the barrel but could the 365s be reformed into 6 car units? If so I think they could be rather useful on some diagrams in the Manchester area. I have generally found them to have more standing room than the 319s.

I *think* I’m right in saying equipment is spread across all four cars.

Certainly one immediate, albeit not insurmountable, issue would be that the accessible toilet and wheelchair space is on the non-pantograph trailer, so dropping that car would immediately make the unit non-compliant.

Investment in platform extensions and the like could of course allow 8-car working...
 

4-SUB 4732

Established Member
Joined
7 Jan 2018
Messages
2,150
I *think* I’m right in saying equipment is spread across all four cars.

Certainly one immediate, albeit not insurmountable, issue would be that the accessible toilet and wheelchair space is on the non-pantograph trailer, so dropping that car would immediately make the unit non-compliant.

Investment in platform extensions and the like could of course allow 8-car working...

Equipment is indeed on every car so any re-forming is likely to prove impossible or at the very least extremely expensive.
 

TheGrew

Member
Joined
31 Jul 2012
Messages
334
I had a nasty suspicion that might be the case. Though as mentioned above 8 car services should be possible with some platform extensions (and in some cases re-activating sections of platforms).
 

BigB

Member
Joined
20 Dec 2018
Messages
268
Location
Scotland
Equipment is indeed on every car so any re-forming is likely to prove impossible or at the very least extremely expensive.

This was th case with the 321s that were shortened to 3 car 320s - it required a fair bit of reengineering but was successfully done.
Where there is an economic case changes can always be made.
 

cactustwirly

Established Member
Joined
10 Apr 2013
Messages
7,455
Location
UK
Has that actually been confirmed? Seems feasible, given that they could be maintained at Ardwick as is currently the case with the TPE fleet.

LNR are ditching the 350/2s when the Aventras finally arrive!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top