Trying to think out of the box: if the WCML Euston area is already up the creek, say down to the 2 slow lines already, and the majority of LNR services are off, VT have to follow anyway. Is there something in particular that would prevent VT from putting stopping orders at say MKC, HML and either WFJ or HRW? I believe VT have at one time or another called at all of these stations. They are guard-operated, the platforms are long enough. Ticketing would be a mess, but ticket acceptance may already be in place.
Another one: assuming disruption was off-peak and LO had AC/DC trains spare, is there something to prevent LNR/VT and LO from working together to use up spare paths and run an express EUS/HRW/WFJ service? I believe LO must have some additional route knowledge as they use the slow lines for empty stock moves. Both sets of their trains have cameras so again platform infrastructure shouldn't be a problem. They could even use the new bay at WFJ?
I also can't see why the Southern couldn't run yesterday. All of the disruption was south of the WLL junction. In fact, the fast lines were even open north of the WLL, so Southern could have made up time by not diving under. There must have been spare paths from all the trapped VT services? Even if they reduced to the CLJ to WFJ shuttle it would have been better than nothing. Forgive me if I'm wrong but seems a bit like operational cutting loose on Southerns part.
There have got to be some out-of-the-box solutions during WCML disruptions if only they could all work together? No? Over this railways dead body?