• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

The 2019 General Election Result and Aftermath

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

TrafficEng

Member
Joined
13 Nov 2019
Messages
419
Location
North of London
Labour seems to have become the metropolitan party, with every large city going Labour...

It is striking looking at the results map how small a geographic area Labour have control of, even though they retain a decent number of seats.

And ironic that an election fought primarily over Brexit leaves the country coloured predominantly yellow and blue.
 

Jordan Adam

Established Member
Joined
12 Sep 2017
Messages
5,531
Location
Aberdeen
Boris has typically been more of a Left wing Tory, so perhaps now that he has a majority he won't be under the same pressure from the right wing group of the party and will take a more centre approach. Not saying that'll happen, but i like to remain optimistic.

The issue with Labour is that many have viewed them as going too far left, they're only chances of getting in power again would be if a resurgence of "New Labour" (so to speak) happened. I also think that Jeremy failed to connect with the working class above 30 demographic in the north.

A great result for the SNP, with my local candidate seeing her majority increase from 4,139 to 12,670. It's a shame that Banff & Buckie and Aberdeenshire West have stayed Tory, but it's not a huge surprise and the SNP have tightened the gap, the Tory majority in the latter falling from around 8,000 to around 800.

The highlight of the night for me had to be Jo Swinson loosing her seat to the SNP, followed by Nicola's reaction. I do suspect there will be another independence referendum soon.
 

nlogax

Established Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
5,374
Location
Mostly Glasgow-ish. Mostly.
Johnson now has a large enough majority to effectively ignore some of the more hardened Brexiteers and nutjobs and work on a decent trade agreement, even with a view to extending the transition in order to secure an economically sensible deal.

I do suspect there will be another independence referendum soon.

I'd like to think it's possible but under what circumstances could the government be forced or persuaded to grant one?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Bayum

Established Member
Joined
21 Mar 2008
Messages
2,905
Location
Leeds
By any measure he has now had endorsement of 'his' deal. Why would he tear that up and try to negotiate something the people who voted for him don't want?

If people in traditionally Labour seats wanted a softer Brexit then they would have voted Labour, regardless of who is leading the party. Meanwhile the LibDems will not be seeing their leader in Number 10.

The only reason for Johnson to renegotiate would be to 'unite the country'. The indications from the opposition parties overnight is that nothing short of 'stopping Boris' would be enough to achieve that, as far as they are concerned.
He already had an endorsement. He effed it over by trying to put it through parliament in three days!
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
17,776
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
This is pretty much what I've been hearing too. And whilst the votes might be lent to the Tories, and consequences will be felt most by the very same people. Turkeys & Christmas spring to mind. Such is politics circa 2019....

This may or may not turn out to be true, but I think Labour misses the point that these people feel they are suffering consequences *now*, as a result of things done and not done in the Blair years.

Labour took their eye off the ball years ago, just that Corbyn’s rhetoric made this much more conspicuous than it was in the Blair years.

Of course the loss of Scotland to Labour was another unintended consequence of the Blair years, albeit coming about through a completely different set of circumstances. Scottish seats are crucial for building a Labour majority, so without them they are already on the back foot.
 

Tetchytyke

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Sep 2013
Messages
13,305
Location
Isle of Man

You can sigh if you want. But- as I suspect, I come from there, I live there- I'm closer to the truth than many want to admit. Especially with "Workington Man".

The old working men's club mentality is still alive and kicking. So send the buggers back and wor lass stays at home to cook the tea.

It’s the divisive identity politics which IMO has pissed people off.

I've genuinely not seen much of it. And I don't see why equality is divisive, unless one is a white middle class bloke. But meh.

I'd say Brexit is the main reason. But meh.

My fear is that Labour do what the Tories did in 97 and 2001. After getting a trouncing they lurched to the right with a truly awful leader. And after a second trouncing in 2001 they stayed right where they were, with an even more awful leader.
 

TrafficEng

Member
Joined
13 Nov 2019
Messages
419
Location
North of London
Indeed. Whilst I do not like the result, I think that in order to fix it, the first step would be to understand why people voted for the Tories. But that’ll never happen for other people on the left, because they can’t comprehend having to actually talk to people.
<snip>

The first step is for the policy makers to understand why people voted Leave, rather than dismissing them as racists and idiots.

Once that is done, the second step won't need a great deal of thinking about.
 

py_megapixel

Established Member
Joined
5 Nov 2018
Messages
6,673
Location
Northern England
Personally, after his performance since he first became prime minister, I wouldn't trust Boris Johnson to deliver Christmas cards to his neighbours, let alone Brexit, which will probably require some very careful treading to avoid leaving the country in ruins - if that's possible at all.

But he's got what he wanted now. He has a clear majority in the Commons. Time to see if he can actually keep to his promises. (Which, in typical Tory fashion, include both increases in spending and freezes on income taxes).

I highly doubt that in five years, construction will have started on 6 new hospitals, there will be a review of the impacts on air and noise pollution levels of Heathrow Airport which will determine whether the third runway could be built, a £14bn increase in school funding etc etc.

But you never know. There's a tiny chance that he will surprise us.
 

Pakenhamtrain

Member
Joined
26 Jan 2014
Messages
1,018
Location
Melbourne, Australia
It appears the same thing that happened in America and Australia is happening in the UK. The working class abandoning the party that traditionally represented them.
 

Bantamzen

Established Member
Joined
4 Dec 2013
Messages
9,742
Location
Baildon, West Yorkshire
This may or may not turn out to be true, but I think Labour misses the point that these people feel they are suffering consequences *now*, as a result of things done and not done in the Blair years.

Labour took their eye off the ball years ago, just that Corbyn’s rhetoric made this much more conspicuous than it was in the Blair years.

Of course the loss of Scotland to Labour was another unintended consequence of the Blair years, albeit coming about through a completely different set of circumstances. Scottish seats are crucial for building a Labour majority, so without them they are already on the back foot.

It isn't just Labour past that has caused issues, the very government they have chosen now has had 9 years in power!
 

Jordan Adam

Established Member
Joined
12 Sep 2017
Messages
5,531
Location
Aberdeen
I'd like to think it's possible but under what circumstances could the government be forced or persuaded to grant one?

Not too sure, i think the 2021 Scottish Parliament elections will be a deciding factor. Obviously those against "Sexit... would argue we voted in 2014 and said no, however it cannot be denied that regardless of position on the issue the circumstances have clearly changed. One of the deciding factors in the 2014 vote was the No campaign saying that if we voted yes we couldn't be a party of the EU - well we got pulled out against our will anyway! If England wants and can have Brexit Scotland must have an Independence vote. It's clear that a self governing Scotland will be the future some day as politically England and Scotland are going in separate directions.

Johnson now has a large enough majority to effectively ignore some of the more hardened Brexiteers and nutjobs.

This is my hope too...

Of course the loss of Scotland to Labour was another unintended consequence of the Blair years, albeit coming about through a completely different set of circumstances. Scottish seats are crucial for building a Labour majority, so without them they are already on the back foot.

I can't see Labour getting their Scottish seats back, from the people i know many still view Scottish Labour as "Red Tories". Labours only real chance in this election would've been had they secured enough seats in England/Wales and could've formed a coalition with the SNP. However this would've likely been very unpopular outside Scotland.
 

TrafficEng

Member
Joined
13 Nov 2019
Messages
419
Location
North of London
He already had an endorsement. He effed it over by trying to put it through parliament in three days!
Realistically though, everyone knew that after the second reading the Bill would have been subject to constant amendments adding in a Customs Union and Single Market membership, and other items which would have been incompatible with the agreed WA, with the sole intention of running the clock down to the next deadline.

The second reading vote was not the endorsement required.

Three days or three months made no difference. Parliament had already set its face against Government policy.
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
14,272
Location
St Albans
LD GAIN St Albans from CON.
At least the St Albans result demonstrates that wealth doesn't automatically mean voting conservative. A 78.1% turnout produced a 12,000 vote swing to get rid of the expense-abusing Anne Main.
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
17,776
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
The first step is for the policy makers to understand why people voted Leave, rather than dismissing them as racists and idiots.

Absolutely. Just had the Lib Dem deputy leader attributing the result to nationalism and populism. This is sheer head in the sand territory.

The first thing certain parties might take from this is that the electorate don’t take well to being effectively told they made the wrong choice in a vote. Even Swinson’s post-defeat commiseration speech continued to contain elements of this.

Meanwhile I’ve already seen hints on social media from Momentum children suggesting they can “reverse” or “remedy” this election result, just like I saw similar on the morning after the EU referendum. They just don’t get it, and the more this attitude persists the more the left is going to wither and die.
 
Last edited:

TrafficEng

Member
Joined
13 Nov 2019
Messages
419
Location
North of London
It should be considered that this is most likely a 2 term conservative government thanks to Corbyn.

Labour have just over 4 years and 4 months to turn things around. As others have said, they cannot hang around.

LD GAIN St Albans from CON.
At least the St Albans result demonstrates that wealth doesn't automatically mean voting conservative. A 78.1% turnout produced a 12,000 vote swing to get rid of the expense-abusing Anne Main.

The Labour vote fell from 13,137 in 2017 to just 5000 this time. That accounts for a big part of the swing. Not all of the St Albans constituency is wealthy.

Also, the LibDems threw vast amounts of resources into winning the seat. Possibly at the cost of winning others elsewhere. Perhaps a pyrrhic win in the final analysis.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

scotrail158713

Established Member
Joined
30 Jan 2019
Messages
1,797
Location
Dundee
Can anyone explain how Boris thinks people voting Conservative have “voted for change” despite the Conservatives being in power for the last nine years?
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
17,776
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
The Labour vote fell from 13,137 in 2017 to just 5000 this time. That accounts for a big part of the swing. Not all of the St Albans constituency is wealthy.

Also, the LibDems threw vast amounts of resources into winning the seat. Possibly at the cost of winning others elsewhere. Perhaps a pyrrhic win in the final analysis.

Very pyrrhic as within seconds of winning St Albans the Lib Dems lost Eastbourne - so back to square one within seconds.
 

nlogax

Established Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
5,374
Location
Mostly Glasgow-ish. Mostly.
Meanwhile I’ve already seen hints on social media from Momentum children suggesting they can “reverse” or “remedy” this election result

Momentum need to exit stage (far) left. They - including Jon Lansman - should disappear from the Labour party if it should have any chance of returning to power within the next decade.

Alan Johnson said it best last night. https://twitter.com/brenkjm/status/1205278775400914944
 

Antman

Established Member
Joined
3 May 2013
Messages
6,842
It appears the same thing that happened in America and Australia is happening in the UK. The working class abandoning the party that traditionally represented them.
I would suggest it's more a case of the Labour Party abandoning the working class people who they were supposed to be representing.
 

NoMorePacers

Established Member
Joined
18 Feb 2016
Messages
1,392
Location
Humberside
I would suggest it's more a case of the Labour Party abandoning the working class people who they were supposed to be representing.
This.

For a while now (since New Labour became a thing) Labour’s policy seems to have been “Oh, the working classes have always voted for us and will continue to do so, so why should we bother trying to represent them?” while chasing middle class voters instead. It worked for a certain amount of time, but now it’s blown up in their face.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,211
The Labour vote fell from 13,137 in 2017 to just 5000 this time. That accounts for a big part of the swing. Not all of the St Albans constituency is wealthy.

Also, the LibDems threw vast amounts of resources into winning the seat. Possibly at the cost of winning others elsewhere. Perhaps a pyrrhic win in the final analysis.

It was more that, unlike in previous years, Labour didn’t bother campaigning in St Albans, and a huge turnout. Personally I’m very pleased to have a new MP this morning!
 
Last edited:

Tetchytyke

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Sep 2013
Messages
13,305
Location
Isle of Man
This may or may not turn out to be true, but I think Labour misses the point that these people feel they are suffering consequences *now*, as a result of things done and not done in the Blair years.

I think that's fair comment, we saw similiar with the rise of the BNP in the early 2000s. But I think Brexit and the BNP are linked, partly as a proxy vote for wider issues, and partly because of pure anti-immigrant sentiment.

But the old working men's club mentality is still there and very insular; clearly the Tories have tapped into that.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,211
Alastair Campbell made a rather sharp point to Lansman last night. Assuming this government goes to a full term, then by the end of it it will have been 50 years since anyone has won an election for Labour other than Tony Blair.
 

Tetchytyke

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Sep 2013
Messages
13,305
Location
Isle of Man
Johnson now has a large enough majority to effectively ignore some of the more hardened Brexiteers and

His campaign chief is a hardened Brexitist and nutjob. So there's no evidence to suggest he'll now ignore them.

"One Nation Conservative" seems to be the Tory Parrots' line this morning, repeated over and over again. Interesting. But the proof will be in the pudding.
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
29,306
Location
Fenny Stratford
We both know the Tories will never do anything to help people in places like Blyth. Your boys have won there but they need to deliver there now. To do that they now need to deal with people in really tough situations and make lives better in poor towns. They need to create jobs that are secure and pay well, they need to improve opportunity, they need to invest in better public services, they need to fix the NHS, they need to make sure that benefits work ( and pay) and they need to look after these people and make things better. They wont. We both know that. Oh and they need to make the impact of brexit not be massively damaging in poor working class towns. Over to you.

I said this last night and stand by it. The Tories need to govern in a way that repays their new supporters.

The guy who won blyth said he would be on the train to london on Monday to get Brexit done and tell boris what he needed.

The problem is I doubt boris is able either intellectually or ideologically to understand or deliver.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top