There are benefits of working in the public sector, more holidays, better (perceived anyway) job security, grades and progression mean pay rises are at least predictable (compared to the private sector companies I've worked for anyway which have all been small, large companies will probably be different).
Of course some people have a sense of service, some will feel inertia, in other words there are many reasons.
Can someone put them back in their box nowSAGE scientist
Headline from Sky News
Boris Johnson press conference later after SAGE scientist warns cases will rise as England lockdown eased
This may well happen on a small scale in these first stages of easing the lockdown, but as more and more people have both doses of the vaccine this should decrease.Headline from Sky News
Boris Johnson press conference later after SAGE scientist warns cases will rise as England lockdown eased
Yes cases may rise due to schools going back, but this will not lead to more hospital admissions and deaths as that link has been broken now!
SAGE scientist warns that the pope is a catholic.
Of course they will rise but with the most vulnerable vaccinated deaths and hospital admissions should not. I'm sick to death of Sky and the BBC with their scaremongering headlines.
You and me both, I have had enough of the press and their scaremongeringSAGE scientist warns that the pope is a catholic.
Of course they will rise but with the most vulnerable vaccinated deaths and hospital admissions should not. I'm sick to death of Sky and the BBC with their scaremongering headlines.
Headline from Sky News
Boris Johnson press conference later after SAGE scientist warns cases will rise as England lockdown eased
Yes cases may rise due to schools going back, but this will not lead to more hospital admissions and deaths as that link has been broken now!
Why do we need press conference to speculate on something which might happen (but probably won't, with the numbers now vaccinated)?
That's probably not what the press conference will be about. It's a classic headline trick to use phrases like "after" or "as" to imply an actual connection between two events, when really they just took place near each other in time or place.Why do we need press conference to speculate on something which might happen (but probably won't, with the numbers now vaccinated)?
Plans to ease lockdown should be delayed if necessary to keep children in school, Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer has said.
Pupils across England are returning to school today for the first time in two months, as part of the first stage of lifting lockdown rules.
But if reopening schools leads to coronavirus infection rates creeping up there may be a need for "other measures to be put back a bit", Sir Keir says.
On a visit to a school in east London, Sir Keir adds that "schools have to be the priority" and that delaying other measures to keep schools open is "a price I think we need to pay".
He also says the government may need to "look more closely" at its plan to regularly test school children for Covid, "to make sure it works". Sir Keir says there's a danger that lots of classes or groups of pupils will have to self-isolate as a result of individuals testing positive.
Labour's call in January for teachers to be prioritised for vaccinations was to "make sure we didn't have that experience," he adds.
There's a surpriseOh boy, Labour pin-up model & part time politician Keir Starmer is hunting another extension to lockdown:
So having attempted & failed to delay school openings, he now wants everyone else to suffer.
Headline from Sky News
Boris Johnson press conference later after SAGE scientist warns cases will rise as England lockdown eased
Yes cases may rise due to schools going back, but this will not lead to more hospital admissions and deaths as that link has been broken now!
I agree that happens, a lot. But the way "after" is used in that headline would have the SAGE scientist's warning itself be the cause of cases rising.That's probably not what the press conference will be about. It's a classic headline trick to use phrases like "after" or "as" to imply an actual connection between two events, when really they just took place near each other in time or place.
Be wary of linking to "Live" pages like that, the headline changes every few minutes.Oh boy, Labour pin-up model & part time politician Keir Starmer is hunting another extension to lockdown:
Hence the reason for quoting the text.Be wary of linking to "Live" pages like that, the headline changes every few minutes.
I continue to think that we have a serious problem brewing. Inflation seems all but inevitable, yet a significant proportion of society seems to only work on the basis of debt. Raising interest rates to control inflation would be a serious problem. But high inflation is equally problematic.
I likewise reckon a lot of people think this is all over when the pubs re-open. It isn't; we're already seeing some of the longer term consequences starting to be felt, and there's plenty more where that came from.
Why do you think inflation is inevitable? I'm not going to claim to be well read in economics so it's a genuine question as would like to understand more about it. I get the reason for raising interest rates if inflation gets too high and why it's also problematic.
If we work on the basis that changes in price can be influenced by changes in demand, changes in supply or external factors, looking at each of those in turn I think there's going to be the right conditions for prices to rise. Firstly, an increase in demand when lockdown eases - look no further than my hotel bookings for this summer for an example of that in action! Then we have the legacy of reductions in supply as a result of restrictions themselves (eg businesses unable to operate at full production due to social distancing / furloughing of staff in response to falls in demand) or the consequences of restrictions (i.e. businesses which have already or will have ceased trading). Then there's increased costs for businesses, again as a result of social distancing and restrictions. I suspect there will also be businesses who will need to increase prices simply in order to make ends meet after having endured a year of costs but received reduced, little or even no revenue. Add in quantitative easing on top of that.
I simply think all the conditions will meet at the same time. Even if this only applies for a relatively short time, it could be enough to cause a spiral.
@brad465 and @bramling have answered from a conservative, relatively monetarist, perspective. I largely agree with their analysis, but think they discount the constraints of under and unemployment at a macroeconomic level on firms ability to raise prices.
At a theoretical level, adherents of “Modern Monetary Theory” argue that these are not inflationary pressures, and that the debt being of government to government in a fiat currency means that the risk of inflation can be discounted. Their arguments are of interest, especially given the limited inflationary impact of QE since 2008.
Andrew Bailey himself has now said there are BoE concerns about rising inflation as restrictions are being eased, and while I have many reservations about him as the chair and their monetary policy, if the institution as a whole is concerned then it's certainly a possibility inflation will cause problems in due course:I'm not sure unemployment is going to be the central issue. We haven't thus far seen a mass-drop-off-a-cliff in terms of job losses, just a gradual drip-drip-drip of business failures -- to be fair at least some of which were possibly already dodgy (something like Debenhams being the classic example, Ian Allan Bookshop another).
I guess time will tell, however I can't see how we're going to avoid a situation where firms knock up prices in order to offset losses and added costs from the last year, which will almost certainly combine with a period where pent-up demand exists. How long this situation exists for will perhaps be the determining question.
Oh boy, Labour pin-up model & part time politician Keir Starmer is hunting another extension to lockdown:
So having attempted & failed to delay school openings, he now wants everyone else to suffer.
Inflation will almost certainly rise shortly. You can already see it in the higher prices being charged for accommodation, particularly in tourist spots, once lockdown is expected to end. I would expect the Consumer Price Index (CPI) to be 'tweaked' in the near future to remove or reduce elements such as 'Restaurants and Hotels' and 'Recreation and Culture' shortly, so as to ensure the CPI doesn't rise too much.Andrew Bailey himself has now said there are BoE concerns about rising inflation as restrictions are being eased, and while I have many reservations about him as the chair and their monetary policy, if the institution as a whole is concerned then it's certainly a possibility inflation will cause problems in due course:
Oh boy, Labour pin-up model & part time politician Keir Starmer is hunting another extension to lockdown:
So having attempted & failed to delay school openings, he now wants everyone else to suffer.
I'm surprised that a "SAGE scientist" hasn't "warned" that bears usually go and defecate in the woods as well.
Completely right. A bit sick of Captain Hindsight who provides nothing useful except for the now tired lines of 'we needed to lockdown harder, longer, stronger, earlier' yet when push comes to shove, he just goes along with the government anyway.Labour are a waste of space. A wet lettuce would make a better opposition.
Completely right. A bit sick of Captain Hindsight who provides nothing useful except for the now tired lines of 'we needed to lockdown harder, longer, stronger, earlier' yet when push comes to shove, he just goes along with the government anyway.
What! Bears defecate in the woods! We must have another lockdown to stop this from happening!Don't you mean Sir Keir Bandwagon, the leader of the opposition?
I'm surprised that a "SAGE scientist" hasn't "warned" that bears usually go and defecate in the woods as well.
The Captain Hindsight remark is dead, as, even though I do not agree with any of the decisions around imposing lockdowns and harsher restrictions, Starmer has often called for them before Johnson ended up imposing them, which is easy to foresee because Johnson cannot make a rational decision based on multiple options, so waits until there is only one option to make, regardless of how effective it is (he done it with the Brexit deal and with imposing lockdowns). That doesn't mean Starmer is correct, there are many things he's not considered, but my point is the idea he's calling for things in hindsight is incorrect.Completely right. A bit sick of Captain Hindsight who provides nothing useful except for the now tired lines of 'we needed to lockdown harder, longer, stronger, earlier' yet when push comes to shove, he just goes along with the government anyway.
I'm starting to wish I'd voted for Long-Bailey. She was a profoundly useless waste of space, but at least there was no danger of anybody listening to her.Oh boy, Labour pin-up model & part time politician Keir Starmer is hunting another extension to lockdown:
So having attempted & failed to delay school openings, he now wants everyone else to suffer.
Yes I'm being facetious