I am not specifically choosing him as a source of these views. It is just that i have seen a lot of his videos and agree with him on many points when it comes to politics and foreign affairs and related subjects. A lot of my grandchildren watch Andrew Tate and his videos. In fact i think the way i first found out about him was through my grandchildren. So i have ended up watching some of his stuff and agreeing with him on certain points. Of course there are better people with these views but i was just pointing out that not everything that Andrew Tate says is bad unlike what the media tries to paint.
That doesn't matter. Tate's central philosophy is that he hates women, sees his role as to control them and extract sex from them. He'd do that to your daughters and, if you have any, your granddaughters.
Nobody needs you to explain that a man who is a total danger doesn't say 100% bad things all the time. My dude, he's a rapey human trafficker who keeps women captive to make money from sex shows on the internet. The fact he also has dodgy opinions about Russia (what kind of misogynist in the same line of grift doesn't?) which match yours is neither here nor there.
What is going on is a matter between the Ukraine and Russia only and really nothing to do with our country. I am against all sanctions against any country. I think we need to worry about our own country instead rather than a dispute between two countries that has nothing to do with us.
A blissfully ignorant and amoral take. A war on the frontier of Europe is absolutely the UK's - and the EU's - business.
I recommend reading up about what Gaddafi did for his country. Under his leadership Libya was the most stable country in Africa with the highest standard of living. He built up his country very well.
Yes, and industrial productivity under Nazi Germany was vast, and most Germans became more prosperous. But I don't think you'll find many people willing to defend Nazi Germany's record on worker holidays, GDP, re-employment etc. I wonder why that is?
In the west we seem to also have this double standard where we love to criticise people like Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping and Muammar Gaddafi and Andrew Tate etc (i am not disagreeing that they deserve to be criticised) but many other people who are equally as bad are loved if they are an ally of the western governments. Vladimir Zelensky
He name is
Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
It's just "Ukraine", more Russian shilling. "The" Ukraine refers to the area as a region of Russia.
seems to be loved by many people and all of the mainstream media but in reality he is equally as bad as Vladimir Putin is.
Unmoored from reality again.
He has banned pro Russian media and pro Russia political parties in the Ukraine which is the same sort of thing that Vladimir Putin does.
Incredibly, on the outbreak of WWII, Britain banned German media and there was state censorship. That seems like a relatively uncontroversial thing for a country at war to do to its opponent, particularly when it has been invaded by its neighbour who has started an ethnic war.
This is probably going off topic now from Andrew Tate but all i am trying to say is that we seem to have double standards of who we will accept criticism of and who we will accept praise of.
Let me be really clear, Tate's a rapey conman with a hateful and reductive worldview who almost exclusively has unintelligent and mediocre men sticking up for him. That is the whole foundation of the alpha-male movement: unsuccessful, pusillanimous, unattractive men, with a dearth of meaning to their lives, circling "Top G" and other influencers, never having meaningful or organic relationships with women who respect them.
Even if you did agree with some of his points - and who is to say Tate has never said a single thing, once, that *I* might agree with? - only someone with no self-awareness or tact would try to defend him, or use the opportunity as a platform to express a defence of a dictator who illegally invaded a neighbouring country.
Everyone is entitled to their own views and people are free to disagree with me but that is how i personally view it.
You are privileged to live in a free country where people can freely read and disagree with your views. Now try living in Libya or Russia under their respective dictatorships you've defended and try to suggest their governments are fundamentally bad, as you've done here with the British government.
. I'm not usually of the 'lock him up and throw away the key' persuasion, but in his case... Well done to the Roumanians:hope they keep finding reasons to keep him in detention. Wonder if, like Prince Andrew, the big baby has his teddy bear collection with him.
