Cricketer8for9
Member
- Joined
- 11 Jan 2015
- Messages
- 832
Oxted tunnel is apparently the loading gauge limitation on Southern.
As mentioned above, Ledbury Tunnel in Herefordshire has or had special rules due to its restrictive bore. I understand Shakespeare Tunnel in Kent has similarly unique rules.
When planning for SE domestic HS1 services in Kent, the twin single bore Shakespeare tunnels near Dover presented a major problem for emergency egress from the new Hitachi trains which clearly have no end doors in their pointy noses. A solution was found to move the tracks within each bore slightly to one side of the centre line. This created sufficient space on one side of these fairly generously proportioned tunnels that it was considered safe enough for passengers to exit the sliding side doors in an emergency and get down to track level for evacuation. If this solution had not been feasible, it's entirely possible the new trains would not have been cleared to run on this particular route segment, so as a back-up, a connection between the SE and LC&D lines at Canterbury was considered to allow the 395s to reach Dover; that idea has been looked at many times for various reasons and would also have allowed the Folkestone-Dover section to be closed entirely if more cliff slippage had occurred making long term maintenance unviable. I believe in HST days, the Ledbury procedure would have been to direct escaping passengers to a sliding side door in the parcels area of one of the power cars. Entirely new single-track tunnels are usually equipped with a platform height walkway throughout on one side. In double track tunnels, the accepted escape route is usually via the other track, closed to traffic clearly, using normal side doors to alight. A train can also be brought alongside and special bridging ramps used at doorways to facilitate evacuation.Out of interest, what would happen if you needed to have emergency egress whilst in a single line tunnel with tight clearance given not all units are equipped with nose-end doors.
If a unit cannot be evacuated effectively in a tunnel for whatever reason, then the unit wouldn’t be cleared to enter the tunnel.Out of interest, what would happen if you needed to have emergency egress whilst in a single line tunnel with tight clearance given not all units are equipped with nose-end doors.
Would there be regular sections in the tunnel that would have to have sufficient clearance to permit safe egress through a side door ?
From a window height.
Probably is, but the OP specified from window height.Surely a platform edge is closer to the train than a tunnel wall.
Oh yeah, only read the title. A train wash then?Probably is, but the OP specified from window height.![]()
If a unit cannot be evacuated effectively in a tunnel for whatever reason, then the unit wouldn’t be cleared to enter the tunnel.
Northern City Line only allows 717s (and previously 313s) for this reason.
As mentioned above, the Ledbury tunnel had similar issues with HST doors unable to be opened whilst in the tunnel. The evacuation procedure for a HST that became stranded in the tunnel would have been via the power cars, which have sliding doors. And the guard was required to travel in the rear power car whilst entering and in the tunnel, in case an evacuation became necessary. This is no longer relevant of course with the 800s having taken over.
I think that's why Networkers aren't cleared for that tunnel.When planning for SE domestic HS1 services in Kent, the twin single bore Shakespeare tunnels near Dover presented a major problem for emergency egress from the new Hitachi trains which clearly have no end doors in their pointy noses. A solution was found to move the tracks within each bore slightly to one side of the centre line. This created sufficient space on one side of these fairly generously proportioned tunnels that it was considered safe enough for passengers to exit the sliding side doors in an emergency and get down to track level for evacuation. If this solution had not been feasible, it's entirely possible the new trains would not have been cleared to run on this particular route segment, so as a back-up, a connection between the SE and LC&D lines at Canterbury was considered to allow the 395s to reach Dover; that idea has been looked at many times for various reasons and would also have allowed the Folkestone-Dover section to be closed entirely if more cliff slippage had occurred making long term maintenance unviable. I believe in HST days, the Ledbury procedure would have been to direct escaping passengers to a sliding side door in the parcels area of one of the power cars. Entirely new single-track tunnels are usually equipped with a platform height walkway throughout on one side. In double track tunnels, the accepted escape route is usually via the other track, closed to traffic clearly, using normal side doors to alight. A train can also be brought alongside and special bridging ramps used at doorways to facilitate evacuation.
Regardless of whether or not you're allowed to look out of the window, the ORR expects all heritage stock running on the national network to have lockable windows by 31 March 2023.i wonder how long it will be for all railtours to have bars on or a rule where your not aloud to look out
When the day comes that people cannot look out of a window I shall be gone. Leaning out, however...Regardless of whether or not you're allowed to look out of the window, the ORR expects all heritage stock running on the national network to have lockable windows by 31 March 2023.
If we take it to non-passenger carrying (and no reason why not), many more depot area options come into play. Meanwhile - single line token (at exchange).Oh yeah, only read the title. A train wash then?![]()
As a matter of interest does that mean fully closed, or openable to a fixed point for ventilation and then unlockable for the full drop?Regardless of whether or not you're allowed to look out of the window, the ORR expects all heritage stock running on the national network to have lockable windows by 31 March 2023.
You can look out of all glass windows. However you can only lean out of a few these days. Maybe your friend was perceived to be risking injury, given the overgrown nature of the route (which was the point of your post), and which would have lain at the door of the organisers if it had occurred? For those that think they are 'window-savvy' and know better than to get caught out, consider the Balham fatality of a keen rail enthusiast and preserved railway volunteer.i know were not including foliage but a thumper railtour to fawley power station i was on had a bit of trouble with a slightly fallen over tree, i think thats the driver looking out so you can see how close it is, lucky they have thos ugly window bars on the train aye
still diddnt stop a kitchen staff member (or something along thos lines) having a go at my friend for looking out of the window....
not sure how you can look out with bars on .... no other staff member had problems with us standing at the window area, but this person made a big old fuss walking past us every now and again to check.....
i wonder how long it will be for all railtours to have bars on or a rule where your not aloud to look out, thats part of the reason people go on tours as its the only place you still can look out of a window! well apart from heritage railways but again there might come a point where you cant!
Surprised that nobody has mentioned the tunnels on the Tonbridge - Hastings line which were so narrow that special units with a narrow body profile had to be built to operate over the line until the lines through the tunnels were singled in the 1908s.Just out of pure interest, I know some tunnels have a tight bore but which has the tightest bore ?
The tunnels either side of Tunbridge Wells station remain double-track even though they suffered from the same construction quality and clearances problems as others on the line that were singled. This was managed in this specific case by installing slab track to more accurately keep the rails in the correct position. The line speed through the station tunnels is also comparatively low, which limits lateral vehicle oscillations, hence dynamic clearance allowances can be reduced.Surprised that nobody has mentioned the tunnels on the Tonbridge - Hastings line which were so narrow that special units with a narrow body profile had to be built to operate over the line until the lines through the tunnels were singled in the 1908s.
The tunnels had been built on the cheap and were found to be inadequately lined, such that additional courses of brick lining had to be built inside the tunnels, so making them narrower.
Nobody has mentioned a train on the next track. What is the closest approach you would get?
IIRC, wasn't there a potential issue of an APT tilting the wrong way and potentially contacting a train tilting the right way on the opposite track?
Regardless of whether or not you're allowed to look out of the window, the ORR expects all heritage stock running on the national network to have lockable windows by 31 March 2023.
London Underground I would think. The minimum deep tube diameter is 11 ft 8 in. Some parts of the Northern line were 10 ft 6 in prior to re-boring in the 1920s. When new trains were bought for the Northern line in the 1990s the tunnel lining segment flanges has to be ground down in places to achieve clearance.Just out of pure interest, I know some tunnels have a tight bore but which has the tightest bore ?
I remember as a young lad having my face slightly out of the window as we passed Slade Green. It was slam door stock - non corridor so probably EPB. After passing I sat down. Then, in the next tunnel, crash bang wallop. The door I had been standing at was ripped open and off its hinges !. I was sat next to it and to say I was shocked was an understatement. I pulled the emergency cord. I don't know how soon we stopped but we stopped at the next station. The guard came up and was busy accusing me of opening the door. Would not let go of it. I was too shocked to reply. Eventually a railway police officer turned up and asked the guard how this lad could possibly have done all that damage further forwards along our train !. He showed it to me and it extended forwards along the side of the next carriage. Transpired we had hit an open door on a passing train.Nobody has mentioned a train on the next track. What is the closest approach you would get?
IIRC, wasn't there a potential issue of an APT tilting the wrong way and potentially contacting a train tilting the right way on the opposite track?
Isn’t the Glasgow Subway even tighter ?London Underground I would think. The minimum deep tube diameter is 11 ft 8 in. Some parts of the Northern line were 10 ft 6 in prior to re-boring in the 1920s. When new trains were bought for the Northern line in the 1990s the tunnel lining segment flanges has to be ground down in places to achieve clearance.
On the national network I'm not sure. The Northern city line tunnels are about 16 ft diameter which are pretty tight.